Jump to content


- - - - -

Charlotte too boring to host a super bowl?


  • Please log in to reply
74 replies to this topic

#61 dbull75

dbull75

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,009 posts
  • Location:Charlotte

Posted 30 December 2009 - 07:29 PM

View PostSpartan, on 30 December 2009 - 03:34 PM, said:

Just to stand up for Jacksonville here, until I see some concrete numbers, I'm going to assume they (the metro area) have far more hotel rooms than Charlotte simply because they are a coastal city.
That's probably not too far from the truth. I think the next logical step for Charlotte now, since we have a Ritz-Carlton, is to get a W hotel. I can think of too perfect spots :) 1) Next to the Duke Energy Center where the condo tower was supposed to go or 2) Where TWELVE was set to go next to Catalyst.

 

#62 NCMike1990

NCMike1990

    Unincorporated Area

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 75 posts

Posted 30 December 2009 - 09:34 PM

View Postdbull75, on 30 December 2009 - 07:29 PM, said:

That's probably not too far from the truth. I think the next logical step for Charlotte now, since we have a Ritz-Carlton, is to get a W hotel. I can think of too perfect spots Posted Image 1) Next to the Duke Energy Center where the condo tower was supposed to go or 2) Where TWELVE was set to go next to Catalyst.
Yes I agree. I think a hotel would be a better solution than the original condo tower that was supposed to built on top of the Mint next to Duke Energy Center.

#63 southslider

southslider

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 833 posts

Posted 31 December 2009 - 01:55 PM

^I like those ideas, but I think two other options could be the non-office floors (or former condo floors) of 300 S. Tryon or a shorter re-design (again former condos) of 210 Trade atop Epicentre.

#64 AuLukey

AuLukey

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,220 posts
  • Location:University City, CLT

Posted 26 May 2010 - 09:29 AM

So much for the line drawn for open air stadiums.  The 2014 Super Bowl will be played in the new Meadowlands stadium in NYC.  The average temperature range there in early Feb is 16 to 57 degrees.  This let's a lot of open air stadiums, and their respective cities, know that they are not truly out of the running due to geography and the lack of a dome.

Not saying Charlotte is ready, but at least this hurdle is out of the way.

#65 Urbanity

Urbanity

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 780 posts
  • Location:Charlotte, NC

Posted 26 May 2010 - 10:23 AM

Yeah and what was most interesting is some of the quotes from the NFL about returning to roots and how this would not be a one-off event.  There was also talk of Baltimore and Philadelphia planning future bids.

I absolutely agree that Charlotte isn't ready today for the Bowl, but by late 2010's and early 2020's I wouldn't be surprised to see the city get a shot.

#66 SmellyCat

SmellyCat

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,314 posts
  • Location:Charlotte

Posted 26 May 2010 - 08:39 PM

View Postaussie luke, on 26 May 2010 - 09:29 AM, said:

So much for the line drawn for open air stadiums.  The 2014 Super Bowl will be played in the new Meadowlands stadium in NYC.  The average temperature range there in early Feb is 16 to 57 degrees.  This let's a lot of open air stadiums, and their respective cities, know that they are not truly out of the running due to geography and the lack of a dome.

Not saying Charlotte is ready, but at least this hurdle is out of the way.

Until 2014, the cold weather Super Bowl is considered a one-off event.  The only reason NY got it was because the Jets and Giants sunk over a $1 billion into their new stadium and the NFL has given Super Bowls to many new expensive stadiums in the past decade or so (Arizona, Detroit, Houston, Dallas).  You may also remember that there was fleeting post-9/11 sentiment to give NYC a Super Bowl to help resuscitate its battered economy.

I think if the weather cooperates for the NY Super Bowl and it turns out to be a hit with fans, TV viewers and critics, you will see a cold weather site Super Bowl on a fairly regular basis.  Even if the weather doesn't cooperate and it's still a hit with fans, it will likely be done again (think NHL's Winter Classic).  Unfortunately, I think the league will only stick to larger northern cities with ample amenities - NYC, Chicago, Washington, perhaps Boston.  I don't see a small "cold weather" city getting the game for many years to come.

#67 dbull75

dbull75

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,009 posts
  • Location:Charlotte

Posted 27 May 2010 - 05:47 AM

SmellyCat is correct in that this NY/NJ Super Bowl is just billed as a one time exception for an outdoor game. This doesn't really open the door for Charlotte at all, IMO. The only way it would become a possibility is if a new stadium is built or BofA got a major renovation with a roof. I'm very skeptical on whether or not there would be other outdoor games  in northern cities. This is more about the NFL showcasing that new stadium and the sentimental aspect of it by allowing them to host a game post-9/11. To me it takes away from what the Super Bowl is all about... a mild to warm temperature game where weather is not a factor. The two best teams playing where one doesn't have the advantage over the other. But I digress :)

#68 LynchMob

LynchMob

    Unincorporated Area

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 22 posts
  • Location:Charlotte

Posted 27 May 2010 - 10:11 AM

I love Charlotte and think it would be great for the city, but part of me does not want the Super Bowl in Charlotte. I went to the Super Bowl in San Diego in the late 90's and it seemed to me that 75% (and that's a low estimate) of the people in town for the game could care less about football. Most of the people were there for the parties, the nightlife, the media, business, to be seen, etc. etc. Now, the stadium holds about 70k fans, but there were about triple that (maybe a lot more) in the city for the experience. So the weather is definetly a factor. New York may be able to pull off a Super Bowl with cold / winter weather because of the other things New York has to offer. So, my heart would love to see Charlotte in the spotlight of the Super Bowl if it went well. However, I would not want to see Charlotte getting ripped on National TV if the weather was horrible, and people complaining about outside events. I know first hand that people were not that thrilled with the rain in Atlanta, Jacksonville in general, and the cold in Detroit. That's why cities like New Orleans and Miami can pull it off, they have good weather and lots of things to do+lots of nightlife. Tampa, Phoenix, and Southern California are in the same boat, warm, sunny, and lots of parties. One day maybe Charlotte. I hope the Super Bowl in New York goes fine, but you throw in some seriously low tempatures and some heavy snow / wind and the 75% of the people I mentioned above are not going to be having so much fun..It could be a disaster even for New York. Just my 2 cents.

#69 cityboi

cityboi

    Metropolis

  • Members+
  • 6,722 posts
  • Location:Greensboro, NC

Posted 06 February 2011 - 06:42 PM

I agree. The two biggest reasons Charlotte can't host the Super Bowl is that Charlotte doesn't have a dome and not enough hotel rooms in the area. If the Super Bowl were held in Charlotte today, hotel rooms would be booked as far a way as Greensboro or Columbia. Thats simply too far away for game fans to stay and people who can afford those super bowl tickets may not want to stay in a Motel 6. It appears as though team owners of the Panthers have informally discussed a major renovation or a new stadium for the Panthers even though Bank of America Stadium is only 15 years old. But in stadium years, Bank of America Stadium is approaching the golden years. In about 15 years, Bank of America stadium will be 30 years old and will likely be outdated by then. Even though Charlotte's stadium is only 15 years old, its already among the oldest in the NFL now. My guess is owners would likely lean towards a new stadium in about 10 years and it will probably be a dome stadium so the Queen City can host the Super Bowl. In about 10 or 15 years Charlotte should have more hotel rooms by then as well. There is one problem though. By the time Charlotte gets a new NFL stadium, it probably won't be uptown. The reason is limited available land. There is about 20 acres of land available near Bank of America Stadium on West Morehead St but that land will likely get snapped up by developers long before there is even serious talk for a new stadium. So Charlotte may be put in the position to either renovate the current stadium to keep it downtown, or build a new dome stadium with a retractable roof not in the downtown area so the city can one day host the Super Bowl. Its a tough call unless they can figure out how to put a dome over Bank of America Stadium, but I doubt that's possible because then you might as well build a new stadium. You could demolish the current stadium and build a new one in its place but where would the Panthers play for 3 years while its being constructed? But right now a lot of NFL teams are envious of the new stadium in Dallas and the New Meadowlands Stadium near New York City. With those new stadiums they have more ways to generate revenue and that contributes in raising the salary cap. That pretty much forces many cities to upgrade or build new stadiums.

But this has happened before with Charlotte. When the Charlotte Coliseum opened for Charlotte's new NBA team it was state-of-the-art. In less than 20 years it was already out of date and a new arena with more luxury boxes had to be built. So whispers of a new stadium for the Panthers doesn't surprise me one bit. Thats just the way Charlotte rolls. But You can bet when the time comes for a new stadium to be built, Charlotte will go all out to try to make it the best in the league and it will probably be more than just a stadium but an entire NFL sports and entertainment complex with a 75,000 seat retractable roof stadium, five star hotel, retail, restaurants and other entertainment venues, something to make it a year round destination and provide more revenue for the team owners. That concept would definitely keep Charlotte on the rotation list for super bowls. Thats where the future of NFL stadiums are headed and its going to get super expensive. Unless Charlotte gets a new NFL stadium with a retractable roof, there will be no Super Bowl in Charlotte. This time of year is just to cold in Charlotte to host a Super bowl in an open air stadium and no one wants to spend $500-$3,000 on a ticket to watch a super bowl game in sleet, freezing rain or even snow. The weather is just too unpredictable here in North Carolina this time of year.

Edited by cityboi, 06 February 2011 - 08:50 PM.


#70 tozmervo

tozmervo

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,618 posts
  • Location:Freedom Park/Dilworth, Charlotte, NC

Posted 06 February 2011 - 10:00 PM

Found it fascinating that "Arlington" was consistently used as the Superbowl location. Bet Dallas officials weren't super thrilled about that.

#71 dbull75

dbull75

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,009 posts
  • Location:Charlotte

Posted 07 February 2011 - 07:35 AM

View Posttozmervo, on 06 February 2011 - 10:00 PM, said:

Found it fascinating that "Arlington" was consistently used as the Superbowl location. Bet Dallas officials weren't super thrilled about that.
Yea, both Arlington and "North Texas"... I pay a lot of attention to sports in general and will say that I could probably count on one hand the number of times I heard anyone refer to "Dallas" as the location the last several weeks.

#72 caterpillar2

caterpillar2

    Whistle-Stop

  • Members+
  • PipPipPip
  • 332 posts

Posted 07 February 2011 - 08:27 AM

Boring has nothing to do with it as it isn't the situation here.  It is all about  a dome. The super bowl will not be played in a place where it could snow unless there is a dome.

#73 dbull75

dbull75

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,009 posts
  • Location:Charlotte

Posted 07 February 2011 - 10:10 AM

View Postcaterpillar2, on 07 February 2011 - 08:27 AM, said:

Boring has nothing to do with it as it isn't the situation here.  It is all about  a dome. The super bowl will not be played in a place where it could snow unless there is a dome.
Or if your city is named "New York City"... The new Meadowlands stadium, which is open air and technically in NJ, will host the Super Bowl in 2014. Outside of that yea, the only way Charlotte has a chance at a Super Bowl is to have a domed stadium.

#74 49er

49er

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 590 posts
  • Location:Charlotte, NC

Posted 07 February 2011 - 11:27 AM

A quick Google search yields 31,000 hotel rooms in the Indianapolis metro so statistically speaking I believe that Charlotte could host a Super Bowl just fine from that aspect. I don't see the wisdom in pushing for a stadium that can host the Super Bowl when in reality you may only get to host once or twice every 20 years. With more cities opting to build domed stadiums, there will be more options than going to New Orleans and Miami every few years. Plus, our weather here in the Fall is (mostly) great for football, outdoors. If they didn't go dome in New York or Phillie, why the heck here? I would support a renovation to keep the stadium in its current spot. It's always been pretty plain jane, but when it first opened it was widely regarded as a "classic" no frills football venue. If the bones are good, maybe Richardson can add on some of the whiz bang features that the NFL craves. There is certainly more to work with that the old Coliseum on Tyvola, that's for sure.

#75 Urbanity

Urbanity

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 780 posts
  • Location:Charlotte, NC

Posted 07 February 2011 - 12:30 PM

Maybe this thread title should be changed to, "When should Charlotte go after the Super bowl?"  Posted Image




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users