A little bit of a stretch...
Started by
megad
, Aug 29 2006 12:55 PM
35 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 29 August 2006 - 12:55 PM
I was watching this.. and I was wondering how cool something like that would be in Providence. Of course, I don't think that kind of architecture would fly in Providence, but I like the idea of having an international contest for a tower design. What does Mississauga have that we don't? We both sort of serve the same purpose (Providence to Boston, Mississauga to Toronto)
http://www.i-mad.com...ation.asp?id=17 ... damn that looks cool
http://www.i-mad.com...ation.asp?id=17 ... damn that looks cool
#2
Posted 29 August 2006 - 01:03 PM
it looks cool, but that would not fit in providence...
#3
Posted 29 August 2006 - 01:07 PM
Not a fan. It looks like an Ikea vase. Though I like the night shot, it would be a better fit in Vegas.
megad, on Aug 29 2006, 02:55 PM, said:
I was watching this.. and I was wondering how cool something like that would be in Providence. Of course, I don't think that kind of architecture would fly in Providence, but I like the idea of having an international contest for a tower design. What does Mississauga have that we don't? We both sort of serve the same purpose (Providence to Boston, Mississauga to Toronto)
http://www.i-mad.com...ation.asp?id=17 ... damn that looks cool
http://www.i-mad.com...ation.asp?id=17 ... damn that looks cool
#4
Posted 29 August 2006 - 01:18 PM
Well if you wanted to explode David Brussat's brain, that's how you'd do it.
PS, Mississauga is a mess.
PS, Mississauga is a mess.
#5
Posted 29 August 2006 - 02:20 PM
i have something that looks just like that.
#8
Posted 29 August 2006 - 03:33 PM
i was thinking of a cheese grater!
#10
Posted 29 August 2006 - 07:06 PM
When someone with a loud stereo drives by, do little rods turn inside and it looks like it is dancing?
#11
Posted 30 August 2006 - 01:09 AM
That city looks totaly unwalkable.
#12
Posted 30 August 2006 - 07:13 AM
Cotuit, on Aug 29 2006, 03:18 PM, said:
PS, Mississauga is a mess. 
#14
Posted 30 August 2006 - 08:58 AM
Toronto managed to incorporate all of the surrounding cities and towns into one metropolitian government, except for Mississauga, which declined because Toronto ignored them when they were nothing but a bedroom community. Now that Mississauga is a thriving city, it said NO to Toronto when they came a knocking. Good for them.
#16
Posted 30 August 2006 - 09:19 AM
Cotuit, on Aug 30 2006, 11:08 AM, said:
Toronto is better off not having it's good name applied to that exurban wasteland.
#17
Posted 30 August 2006 - 10:55 AM
Looks like a modernized Co-op City. It's like the oxymoron of places.














