When I hear of a development being proposed and it has significant height I do this

. However it seems in the valley when they hear that word they do this

. Scottsdale, Tempe, Mesa, even to some extent Phoenix, residents go nuts when a proposal comes in and it wants more than eight levels. Tempe's leadership, has put a moretoreum on height. Stating among reasons that it's downtown would be TO exclusive if there were buildings over a certain hieght? Donald Trump gave us the finger because of the treatment he got from Scottsdale, to the Biltmore, to downtown Phoenix. I understand very much the need for solid longterm civic planning. But does anyone else think that those who are motivated here in the Valley, and even Tucson, are way way to rigid when it comes to developers that want to build up and not out? But isn't that part of the responsibility, planning for density. Aren't the most successful cities even today the ones that are Dense and walkable. For areas that are so stringent on responsible planning, it almost feels like they are arguing and exerting control just because they can.
I can live in a state with Skylines that are mediocre at best. But this state is exploding with growth, and It almost feels like developers are afraid to come here with solid proposals because of the high amount of scrutiny they will be put thru. I have been accused before of being overly in favor of taller structures. That there is more to a city than just tall buildings, I agree. But it seems that in Maricopa county there is an over whelming urge to keep the landscape low and sprawling.
I say, tall buildings augment, not detract from any view.