Traffic Congestion and Highway Construction
#1401
Posted 01 February 2012 - 06:05 PM
WSOC reports on the traffic issues surrounding the Walmart. They point out the obvious: unless you drive through the local neighborhood, you face pulling out onto fast-moving Independence Blvd. God help you if you need to get over to Albemarle Rd. It also sounds like CATS will begin bus service to that Walmart with the usual March 1 service change date - not sure what bus line(s) will be rerouted.
#1402
Posted 02 February 2012 - 12:38 AM
#1403
Posted 02 February 2012 - 10:07 PM
I don't shop at Walmart, but I think its location in a zone of dying big box retail on a transit corridor and high capacity thoroughfare is not bad policy. Where would this have gone that wouldn't cause just as much traffic?
The only problem are the people going across all lanes. The cut through traffic is painful for the neighborhood, but these are city streets and as long as the traffic is calmed appropriately, it should be allowed to help ease some use of the freeway. These cars could very well be from the nearby neighborhoods, which is totally valid.
I agree that a reasonable control for this is to eliminate the right turn exits from the Walmart. People can use the freeway entrance from Pierson or drive to the exits of the Coliseum Shopping Center, which would help support the retailers there.
My hope is just like the Wilkinson Walmart, that this Independence Walmart can help create additional redevelopment of the adjacent shopping. In Wilkinson's case, the strip mall next door with Family Dollar got aesthetic improvements, and a more urban style of complementary retail near Wilkinson and Ashley.
#1404
Posted 03 February 2012 - 11:30 PM
http://www.foxcharlo...-138300989.html
#1405
Posted 04 February 2012 - 12:28 AM
#1406
Posted 04 February 2012 - 11:57 AM
Heres my idea for stations
Charlotte Gateway Station
North Brevard Street (with a an additional LYNX Blue Line station between 9th street and Parkwood to interchange passengers)
Hawthorne Lane/Central Avenue (Transfer stop with Streetcar)
Echo Hills (near Home Depot)
Monroe Road (near Village Lake Drive)
Matthews
Stallings
Indian Trail
Monroe
#1407
Posted 04 February 2012 - 02:22 PM
(1) Capacity: There are currently no sidings (places where trains can pass each other) between Uptown Charlotte and Monroe...a distance of 25 miles. Inbound trains (freight or commuter) would have to wait for an outbound train to completely traverse between uptown and Monroe. Thite s significantly hampers CSX's operations between Pinoca Yard and Monroe Yard. An investment in sidings would be necessary. As the commuter trains would travel faster than many of the freights, it is likely that the sidings would need to be long enough to store an intire freight train. Possibly 10,000 feet.
(2) Access to Charlotte Gateway Station: Currently, there is no direct route between the NS Mainline to and from the proposed Gateway site and the CSX mainline towards Monroe. The most ideal location is at the ADM flour mill site. However, based off of how the mill is set up b/n the existing track configuration, the connection would be almost impossible w/o removing the mill. The mill is also a contributing element of the Seaboard Street Historic District, which complicates things from a federal government standpoint. The proposed Mainline Grade Separation Project which proposes to place the CSX tracks in a trench under the NS Mainline needs to also be considered. As currently proposed, it does not facilitate commuter access from CSX to the Gateway Station.
#1408
Posted 22 February 2012 - 12:17 PM
dubone, on 02 February 2012 - 10:07 PM, said:
I don't shop at Walmart, but I think its location in a zone of dying big box retail on a transit corridor and high capacity thoroughfare is not bad policy. Where would this have gone that wouldn't cause just as much traffic?
The only problem are the people going across all lanes. The cut through traffic is painful for the neighborhood, but these are city streets and as long as the traffic is calmed appropriately, it should be allowed to help ease some use of the freeway. These cars could very well be from the nearby neighborhoods, which is totally valid.
I agree that a reasonable control for this is to eliminate the right turn exits from the Walmart. People can use the freeway entrance from Pierson or drive to the exits of the Coliseum Shopping Center, which would help support the retailers there.
My hope is just like the Wilkinson Walmart, that this Independence Walmart can help create additional redevelopment of the adjacent shopping. In Wilkinson's case, the strip mall next door with Family Dollar got aesthetic improvements, and a more urban style of complementary retail near Wilkinson and Ashley.
This Walmart should never have been located there. We all need to accept that Independence is an "interstate" and not a "street." Would you want to see driveways feeding directly on to I-85? This is functionally the same concept.
The old Walmart at Central & Eastway could have been renovated. That location was at the heart of a small commercial center and it was located where a higher number people could actually walk there from their homes (many people are transit-dependent in that area). The new location does have a bus route, and you can walk there, but it's hard to argue that its not a horrid location. It will succeed because it's Walmart. Not because of the location.
#1409
Posted 22 February 2012 - 12:52 PM
Spartan, on 22 February 2012 - 12:17 PM, said:
The express buses running in the middle of Independence don't and can't stop at the new Wal-Mart. I did hear CATS will start new local service within a couple weeks. Given the expressway nature of Independence, the new bus service (or re-routing of existing services) will connect via surrounding neighborhood streets.
Given the site's history as a commercial center, the location doesn't seem as horrible to me. However, I do dislike the design of the driveway. I think the driveway should have been designed more like an off-ramp, but now a low-cost fix would be to just make the driveway entry-only.
IKEA is located right off I-85. Metropolitan is located right off of I-277. But of course, neither of those developments have driveways directly off the expressway. Still, each of those developments saw new highway ramps built with the development in mind.
Edited by southslider, 22 February 2012 - 12:53 PM.
#1410
Posted 22 February 2012 - 01:13 PM
If I could make wishes, I would say 74 ought to be I-174 or something from 277 to 74 in Rockingham. However, this is no where on the books. The highest level they are planning for in Independence is an expressway and continuing to support the commercial land use alongside it.
The real problem is the ridiculous driveways directly onto the expressway. These commercial arterials/stripmall havens were a national trend, and many areas have already had to deal with them and have a far better job than NCDOT/CDOT have done with Independence. There are designs out there which are far more successful by using collector streets or service roads to keep the retail alive, while supporting the goal of through traffic capacity as well. An example is US19 in Clearwater, FL, but I have seen others. The service roads also are far more efficient at the intersections as traffic is slower by the time it gets to the intersection, it doesn't need wide radii for the on/off ramps. They are simply SPUI-style intersections under a bridge for through traffic.
Neither the city nor the eastside will benefit from a total annihilation of the businesses along this stretch purely for a quicker way to commute to and from the suburban sprawl. There needs to be a balance, since that has been the landuse for the last 40 years.
Studies show there is a glut of retail space on the eastside, and Walmart is a retailer that the current demographics of the area shop at primarily. That successful retailer has taken a dead strip mall with no alternate hope of revival from the dead and we are decrying the traffic coming from people actually shopping there.
I say fix the technical issues arising from the faulty design such as closing some driveways and adding signage to reduce the impact of people crossing all lanes. They can even just paint a solid line keeping on-bound traffic from the driveways in the outer lane for a bit and have strong enforcement of that.
Honestly, this traffic would already have been there if the previous strip mall actually had a current mix of retailers. The Walmart is a lower square footage building than what was there before.
Personally, I don't shop at Walmart, and I don't have a car, and I don't go to retail much on Independence. But unless all that land is going to be purchased for park-land, and the transit line down the center canceled, we, as a city, need businesses on that land that actually generate business.
#1411
Posted 22 February 2012 - 01:18 PM
southslider, on 22 February 2012 - 12:52 PM, said:
Just FYI, starting March 5:
#232 Grier Heights – Service will be extended to the new Wal-Mart located off of Independence and Pierson. The schedule will be adjusted to reflect the new route alignment
This will be the only bus service to the Walmart. For reference sake, the Eastland location was within a quarter mile of the 232, 9, 39 and 17.
#1412
Posted 27 February 2012 - 02:36 PM
southslider, on 22 February 2012 - 12:52 PM, said:
Given the site's history as a commercial center, the location doesn't seem as horrible to me. However, I do dislike the design of the driveway. I think the driveway should have been designed more like an off-ramp, but now a low-cost fix would be to just make the driveway entry-only.
IKEA is located right off I-85. Metropolitan is located right off of I-277. But of course, neither of those developments have driveways directly off the expressway. Still, each of those developments saw new highway ramps built with the development in mind.
Metropolitan has a grid.
IKEA is located off of University City Blvd, which intersects with I-85. UC Blvd is designed for higher traffic volumes since it will eventually connect over to the end of N Graham St, and currently connects to N Tryon and a future LRT station.
Walmart is located directly on Independence. While you can access it via Pierson Dr, it was not designed as a true interchange, which is why there are traffic problems at that location now. The site acts a lot like a giant dead-end street. Sure you can use the neighborhoods to connect over to Albemarle, Sharon Amity, and Monroe, but those streets weren't designed for that purpose.
dubone, on 22 February 2012 - 01:13 PM, said:
The interstatification of Independence has consistently destroyed the commercial land values. It's a very simple cause and effect situation. I don't see any practical reason to revive those businesses because access to them is impossible. I would support the creating of collector/frontage streets that can be used to access business there, though they would need to connect into the neighborhoods for neighborhood services. I don't see much major retail location along that stretch of Independence.
The site on Eastway was probably less than 1/2 mile from the highway, and in the middle of the so-called "Little Mexico" part of town.Tons of people who are transit dependent live over there, and walk(ed) to the shopping center. It has(had) better access to more and better transit options (as the previous poster mentioned) and more neighborhood service businesses for the people who lived there.
I understand Walmarts's move (higher visibility, more affluent customers on Indy) but from a community perspective, the move was terrible.
#1413
Posted 28 February 2012 - 02:42 AM
I just can't envision a time when these land plots are either the TOD utopia that would warrant or support a light rail line or a time when brick walls go up like in Elizabeth all the way down to Matthews and have that land re-orient itself back out to their neighborhoods. We are stuck with commercial land uses for another generation, so my point is why not have them be commercial retail that people actually go to.
#1414
Posted 28 February 2012 - 08:53 AM
Third Strike, on 03 February 2012 - 11:30 PM, said:
http://www.foxcharlo...-138300989.html
dubone, on 28 February 2012 - 02:42 AM, said:
If FOX Charlotte and other media outlets would actually do some research, they would realize that CATS is no longer planning rapid transit down the middle of Independence. The October 2011 MTC minutes clearly state that board took action to no longer preserve the middle of this hybrid street-highway for rapid transit.
http://charmeck.org/...er 26, 2011.pdf
#1415
Posted 28 February 2012 - 04:59 PM
EDIT: Ok, I guess I missed that whole development last fall, and actually it makes me happy. I was always pretty cold on the idea of Indy median transit. And I guess that yes, they both want that land to reorient to the neighborhoods and have the neighborhoods urbanize towards Monroe. I like it!
As for Walmart then, seal the driveways and improve the Pierson interchange and be done with it.
#1416
Posted 28 February 2012 - 10:23 PM
Edited by Shawn&Zae, 28 February 2012 - 10:24 PM.
#1417
Posted 29 February 2012 - 12:02 PM
Maybe I am wrong as I haven't had a chance to read the full report.
http://www.thmgmt.co...ipReportWeb.pdf
Regardless, it makes a lot of sense to, at a minimum, make the remainder of the build out would have a single median and use paint to create a bus-friendly HOT lane. But on the already-built section, it would be dangerous to have opposing HOT traffic moving at freeway speeds with just a painted median, but I don't know how difficult it would be to take out the 2 jersey barriers and replace with a single one, given drainage and other concerns.
This is one of those things I had simply accepted as fact, but now that is being reconsidered seems to make absolute sense like 'why didn't they plan this all along'. In the end, exurban commuters get an express bus for commute hours, and the urban residents get a rail line (streetcar) to increase capacity and spur urban densification of the neighborhoods along Monroe Rd. There are already good transit demographics along Monroe. Plus, the ideal setup for Independence is to eventually be be an interstate-level freeway, as clearly it is needed for that radius of the city, so putting a wall up and reorienting the dying parcels from Independence to the neighborhoods (like what was done in Elizabeth) will be a net positive.
However, there is still going to be some level of auto-oriented development that remains along the freeway, and they are still going to need to add a string of service roads.
#1418
Posted 29 February 2012 - 12:27 PM
#1419
Posted 29 February 2012 - 12:33 PM
http://action.sierra..._src=112AGTNZ01
I think I'm actually going to sit here and take the time to nominate the Garden Parkway. I hope no one has to ask if I'm nominating for best or worst.
#1420
Posted 29 February 2012 - 01:58 PM
As for the service roads, do you have a link to more information on that? I have really seen anything of the sort, although obviously that would be another good way to close the driveways going to Wallyworld.
The half-ass freeway was to save money, but also to keep the retail alive. That failed, so yeah, it will be a good thing to go in and take it to the next level. Of course, there is still the strange issue of Independence always being listed on the top for congestion and traffic volumes, but very low for funding priority. Hopefully once 485 and 85 are done, it will not have to compete with as many megaprojects for funding.
If we can get plans for service roads in place, I'd love to see all of Independence be done at once as a freeway extension of the tollway from Union. Build it from the outer sections in, and use the revenues to add sections over time and eventually get to Idlewild and do the upgrades from Briar Creek to Idlewild then.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













