Downtown Master Plan & Urban Code
#21
Posted 31 October 2006 - 08:50 PM
#22
Posted 31 October 2006 - 10:28 PM
One of Spartanburg's biggest problems, and benefits, its that its landmakrs are so spread out. That will ultimately encourange people to walk between them, but there needs to be a reason to walk. Its a chicken and egg sort of thing. So I am hoping the City will live up to its end of things and buy a freaking chicken
#23
Posted 01 November 2006 - 08:56 AM
I missed the slide that rerouted 29, but as I said there is a lot of substance in this presentation. What is also cool is it can be done without having to land the "big fish" right off the bat. If we fix our pond, the fish will come.
#24
Posted 01 November 2006 - 02:41 PM
#25
Posted 01 November 2006 - 07:27 PM
I also liked the new road that connected through form the Marriot to Pine St. I assume it would be the natural extension of Archer Street.
The hotel DOES help alot. It is very successful too. I think that Spartanburg can handle at least one more decent sized hotel.
#26
Posted 02 November 2006 - 08:56 AM
#27
Posted 02 November 2006 - 09:52 AM
#28
Posted 02 November 2006 - 09:58 AM
alias007, on Nov 2 2006, 09:56 AM, said:
John White Sr founded the Beacon Drive-In, which is a legendary Spartanburg eating establishment. If you haven't been you should go today
John White Blvd used to be called Reidville Rd, and many people still call it that. (they just renamed the section of Reidville Rd from I-26 to Main St)
#29
Posted 02 November 2006 - 04:46 PM
#30
Posted 26 November 2006 - 11:27 AM
Things that ahve been called for in the past have not come to fruition. The last plan in 1991 had several key things they we needed including a redesigned square, a parking structure, and a new cultural arts center among other things.
The future calls for density and bringing people back to the city and more importantly back to downtown. There used to be a good mix of people living downtown, but now it is devoid of residences.
Converse Heights is an an example of a solid intown neigborhood, and Hampton Heights is well on its way to becoming a string intown neighborhood as well... supposedly the Preservation Trust ahs identified other target neighborhoods to expand its effort to.
I hope that Park Hills, North Dean, South Converse, and Beaumont are among its next targets neightborhoods.
#31
Posted 26 November 2006 - 07:57 PM
#32
Posted 02 March 2007 - 11:45 AM
#33
Posted 02 March 2007 - 08:55 PM
#34
Posted 24 April 2007 - 07:02 AM
#35
Posted 13 May 2007 - 10:58 PM
#36
Posted 14 May 2007 - 06:05 PM
#37
Posted 14 May 2007 - 10:38 PM
#38
Posted 19 May 2007 - 03:42 PM
http://www.gsabusiness.com/
#39
Posted 20 May 2007 - 06:27 PM
Spartan, on May 19 2007, 04:42 PM, said:
http://www.gsabusiness.com/
Wow, the rendering looks great. And sounds like the 10 mixed use developments could really transform DT. Looking forward to seeing some more plans on this.
#40
Posted 20 May 2007 - 09:15 PM
Recent blog entries on this topic
From: Downtown Master Plan & Urban Code
By Spartan in The Spartan Blog, on 01 February 2010 - 09:16 PMRead Full Entry →
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













