The 40 Steps
#1
Posted 08 January 2007 - 04:52 PM
This is a place where you can feel free to discuss things that don't specifically have to do with the urban issues we focus on here at UP. Also new members who feel they don't really have something specific to contribute can introduce themselves here, or ask questions if they don't feel like they have enough to start a new thread about.
#3
Posted 08 January 2007 - 07:31 PM
#5
Posted 08 January 2007 - 10:55 PM
#6
Posted 08 January 2007 - 11:26 PM
In the 'Gilded Age,' when the mansions were in their heyday, the Forty Steps were a popular evening gathering spot for servants of the various estates, with dancing, drinking, and other such merriment.
Anyway, great title for the off-topic thread.
#7
Posted 09 January 2007 - 12:07 AM
Gusterfell, on Jan 9 2007, 12:26 AM, said:
In the 'Gilded Age,' when the mansions were in their heyday, the Forty Steps were a popular evening gathering spot for servants of the various estates, with dancing, drinking, and other such merriment.
Anyway, great title for the off-topic thread.
I motion we have a Reject's Beach thread, and look down on the unwashed peons who post there.
#9
Posted 09 January 2007 - 10:13 PM
Somebody knows how I like to be tickled.
Gusterfell, it includes the picture of the Audrain Building that you posted for me.
#10
Posted 10 January 2007 - 05:24 AM
#11
Posted 13 January 2007 - 04:31 PM
But I'm not sure how much of this would surprise you. I expect that you've seen many of these very photos before.
Looking at these before & after scenes, I find myself musing how easy it is to stripmaul (!) a place and how hard it is to repair that damage afterward.
BTW, what's going on next to Arnold Art?
Edit: and the Sovereign on Thames is going to be an abomination. I already want it razed.
Edited by Lone Ranger, 13 January 2007 - 04:34 PM.
#12
Posted 13 January 2007 - 07:44 PM
Lone Ranger, on Jan 13 2007, 05:31 PM, said:
Edit: and the Sovereign on Thames is going to be an abomination. I already want it razed.
I'm going to hold my opinion on the Sovereign Bank. It's safe to say that this project had no HDC oversight! Sure, I'm no fan of the quasi-flat roof...but I don't even know what the materials are yet!
#13
Posted 13 January 2007 - 10:09 PM
MapmanNo1, on Jan 13 2007, 08:44 PM, said:
I've been out of town for the last week, and won't be back for another week. You're scaring me a bit.
#14
Posted 22 January 2007 - 03:39 PM
I happen to know that they continue to retain a PO box. And I know they operated not only as a market and deli but also as a caterer. It occurs to me, as the PO box remains open and (ahem) continues to receive a good deal of mail, that the catering business is probably still in operation, even though the market & deli are gone. But does that leave open the possibility that they would reopen the popular market & deli if they could find a suitable location?
#15
Posted 22 January 2007 - 09:20 PM
#16
Posted 24 January 2007 - 03:31 PM
The city of Newport, as a city, was so ... so ... so healthy.
The pictures of Thames St are heartbreaking. For anybody who knows what Thames St is like now, to see what it was like back then ... god. Why, why, why does America's Cup have to exist? They smashed that road through the heart of town like a battering ram. They gutted the city with it. It's almost enough to make you cry. By comparison, what we have left of downtown today, in some ways, feels like a cheap mockup.
Not to denigrate the value of what's there now. I don't mean that at all. But there was so much more.
Other pictures of note are those of the destruction left in the wake of the '38 hurricane. We hear a lot about what that hurricane did to downtown Providence. I'd never considered its impact on Newport before. Yeah it hit hard. Hard.
#17
Posted 10 April 2007 - 07:25 PM
Quote
It's not that we don't like the new signs that have been going up in the past several years; they might not be as quaint as the old signs, but they are easier to read.
However, the city still seems to be miserly in the amount of guidance it is willing to give drivers. At many intersections, there is only a single sign naming one of the streets. At some crossings, there is no sign at all. Drivers on certain streets can go for block after block without seeing a single sign that tells them what street they are on.
We've complained about this before, and we had hoped the city's sign replacement program would correct some of these deficiencies. Now, as the city considers revising and updating its tourism signage yet again, it also should work on better identifying its streets, for the benefit of visitors and residents alike.
Meh. I agree that, sure, the signs are uglier yet more visible than the old ones, and RI in general is HORRIBLE when it comes to installing signs that identify main roads, but the real solution is to get more tourists out of their cars and onto their feet, trolleys, and bikes (with a good map, of course!) if you want to reduce seasonal traffic.
#18
Posted 21 April 2007 - 01:00 PM
I was interested. I thought some of you might be as well.
I think I like it.
#19
Posted 21 April 2007 - 07:36 PM
#20
Posted 22 April 2007 - 08:05 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users














