mr2448, on 13 December 2009 - 06:36 PM, said:
Any plan that does not include continuation as light rail and private right of ways is doomed to failure. The Information District needs to have land set aside for ROW without automobile traffic. Side streets such as ACORN, Union, etc need to be transit ROW for both bus and light rail/streetcar traffic. Unlike other cities that now have electric traffic, Providence does not have those large roadways that will allow electric traffic to keep to the right. Can you imagine Broad Street without any on street parking? Tracks would be down the middle of the street. North Main Street travel would also need to be down the middle of the street as it was 65 years ago. Can you see pedestrian injuries as they have seen in Houston? I am a big fan of electric travel, but until these issues of ROW and light rail are settled, I would prefer overhead electric buses such as Dayton, Boston, and San Francisco have.
Just as a side note, the trolleys in Philly run through the neighborhoods in city traffic, at least the west Philly one does. The others have their own ROW in the middle of the street, but I think that's only for part of the route. Some of them then go underground and go high speed into Center City, but in the neighborhoods, they're moving along with the flow of traffic. Of course, the route I'm thinking of doesn't have the traffic that Broad St does.
I think even if we added trolleys that went along with the flow of traffic, they'd get used by people who look down on the buses, even if they went through "undesirable" areas.