Eastern NC population drain
#1
Posted 17 January 2007 - 03:25 PM
The figures make Edgecombe County's projected growth rate over that time negative 13.3 percent – the lowest in the state. It is one of nine counties expected to lose population over the next quarter-decade, and one of only two expected to shrink by more than 10 percent.
http://www.rockymoun...1/14/drain.html
#2
Posted 19 January 2007 - 05:27 AM
Looking at the projections, it should be mentioned that the drop in Edgecome would be paired with a surge in Nash and Pitt - what is being projected (methinks) is the drain of the middle-class, educated class and professional class out of Edgecombe, and into suburban Raleigh or Greenville. There are several spots in E NC that have been experiencing a brain drain for a while - the swath of counties between Edgecombe and the Chowan River are all projected to lose population, and both Kinston and Goldsboro have been experiencing slow, steady population declines for more than a decade. Obviously, incentives or new freeways alone ain't doing it down there.
The spots where growth has been occuring (excepting Wilmington, which has more of an independently successful economy) - New Bern, Greenville, the Albemarle region (bet. the sound and the VA line) are worth a look - retirees, universities, tourism, or proximity to larger cities are helping those places out, and at least the first 2 of those factors could be investigated by folks in Edgecombe.
#3
Posted 19 January 2007 - 01:38 PM
#4
Posted 20 January 2007 - 11:33 AM
At present the projections are for most of the counties you mentioned to lose population, though none so drastically as Edgecombe. But 30 years is a long time, and engaged and outside-the-box leadership in any or all of those counties could slow or reverse the decline, though I think it will require some unorthodox ideas.
#5
Posted 27 January 2007 - 06:30 PM
davidals, on Jan 19 2007, 06:27 AM, said:
Looking at the projections, it should be mentioned that the drop in Edgecome would be paired with a surge in Nash and Pitt - what is being projected (methinks) is the drain of the middle-class, educated class and professional class out of Edgecombe, and into suburban Raleigh or Greenville. There are several spots in E NC that have been experiencing a brain drain for a while - the swath of counties between Edgecombe and the Chowan River are all projected to lose population, and both Kinston and Goldsboro have been experiencing slow, steady population declines for more than a decade. Obviously, incentives or new freeways alone ain't doing it down there.
The spots where growth has been occuring (excepting Wilmington, which has more of an independently successful economy) - New Bern, Greenville, the Albemarle region (bet. the sound and the VA line) are worth a look - retirees, universities, tourism, or proximity to larger cities are helping those places out, and at least the first 2 of those factors could be investigated by folks in Edgecombe.
Wilson is also growing.........Just wanted to make sure you knew that town existed.....
#6
Posted 27 January 2007 - 10:10 PM
RaleighHeelsfan, on Jan 27 2007, 07:30 PM, said:
Wilson's still a town?? You jest! (just kiddin') The last time I was there they had added quite a bit of retail and restaurant options.
Edited by suburban george3, 27 January 2007 - 10:11 PM.
#7
Posted 28 January 2007 - 08:35 AM
#8
Posted 04 February 2007 - 11:52 PM
davidals, on Jan 20 2007, 12:33 PM, said:
At present the projections are for most of the counties you mentioned to lose population, though none so drastically as Edgecombe. But 30 years is a long time, and engaged and outside-the-box leadership in any or all of those counties could slow or reverse the decline, though I think it will require some unorthodox ideas.
at that time all of Raleigh's population was on or inside of I-440. It predicted massive growth in the direction of Garner(south). Lo and behold, Falls Lake Dam gets built to the north, IBM relocates most of its workforce from Poughkeepsie NY to RTP and those high salaries opt for large lots near and north of the only existing portion of 440, the northern arc.....south Raleigh towards Garner barely grew during those 30 years.
#9
Posted 22 March 2007 - 09:17 AM
I really don't have a good answer to deal with the problems there. As the article states, not close enough to the beach and not close enough to the small urban centers. I don't think the answer is building tons of unneeded roads, but I would think there should be an emphasis on education (ECU will get a new dental school), although there's no way to guarantee graduates will stay.
#10
Posted 22 March 2007 - 09:23 AM
There is a city in Ohio that is not working on "smart growth" but "smart decline." Their city had much more population in the mid-20th century, and is now closer to 66,000. Youngstown seems to have more natural assets than a lot of places downeast. The TransPark has been a massive waste of money.
Would it be better helping people relocate?
#11
Posted 22 March 2007 - 09:31 AM
#12
Posted 22 March 2007 - 09:57 AM
Quote
The ECU med school, in fact, has not led to more physicians in this part of the state. Oddly enough, many small towns in eastern NC limit the # of practicing physicians. I think they do this with dentists as well. People thought that research entities would pop around Greenville after the med school (although focused on family health) became operational but there has been minimal action-I think there is one pharmaceutical manufacturing facility there.
#13
Posted 22 March 2007 - 10:16 AM
#14
Posted 22 March 2007 - 10:18 AM
#15
Posted 22 March 2007 - 10:39 AM
willrusso, on Mar 22 2007, 11:18 AM, said:
Honestly...you're correct. No one wants to live down east, except for those who enjoy the rural lifestyle. Frankly, I'm worried that the more we move away from agriculture and manuafacturing, the worse our economy will become. We really need a strong collaboration of industries in the USA. Never forget what manufacturing and agriculture has done for this country.
Personally, I enjoy urban life and culture; but there is something special in going out to my in-law's house which sits on 24 acres where no amenities beyond electricity and satelitte tv exist.
Also keep in mind that for every thriving metropolitan area, there are dozens of rural towns. We will always have these extremes. That's the beauty of the developed world and the world's most powerful economy. The towns in Eastern NC will never be what Raleigh has become. They need to find their own charm (like Asheville) and market that.
#16
Posted 22 March 2007 - 10:55 AM
capitalcity, on Mar 22 2007, 11:39 AM, said:
Personally, I enjoy urban life and culture; but there is something special in going out to my in-law's house which sits on 24 acres where no amenities beyond electricity and satelitte tv exist.
Also keep in mind that for every thriving metropolitan area, there are dozens of rural towns. We will always have these extremes. That's the beauty of the developed world and the world's most powerful economy. The towns in Eastern NC will never be what Raleigh has become. They need to find their own charm (like Asheville) and market that.
I think your right & the cities should be Morehead City, Wilmington, or Greenville. My choice would be wilmington, NC.
#17
Posted 22 March 2007 - 11:41 AM
#18
Posted 22 March 2007 - 02:57 PM
Edited by NcSc74, 22 March 2007 - 02:58 PM.
#19
Posted 07 April 2007 - 10:40 AM
transitman, on Mar 22 2007, 09:23 AM, said:
There is a city in Ohio that is not working on "smart growth" but "smart decline." Their city had much more population in the mid-20th century, and is now closer to 66,000. Youngstown seems to have more natural assets than a lot of places downeast. The TransPark has been a massive waste of money.
Would it be better helping people relocate?
Maybe - this is an intriguing idea. I think there are major risks - a steady depopulation of E NC to me could look like the depopulation of inner cities by the middle class in the 50s-70s, writ large: the best-and-brightest E of I-95 flooding out of the region, leaving nothing but retirees and assorted social problems behind (which would cost the rest of the state in significant ways). The dearth of options E of I-95: roads to nowhere, a university network that is not going to expand, basically nothing apart from the military and retirement communities doesn't suggest anything good, and a handful of things I've seen pop up in the News And Observer (editorials hyping Nashville and Mt Olive [!]) as good exurban choices for Triangle residents suggest a slow-building sense of desperation in the region, and tourist/retail jobs aren't an adequate replacement for anything. The costs of a dead economy in one region will impact neighboring regions in a variety of ways.
Helping people relocate isn't on the radar, methinks - seeing a dramatic upswing in university attendance and educational gains, or in entrepreneurship and business growth are just about as likely, and I'd be surprised if we saw any of those things on a much broader scale. Again, there are also things like global warming or escalating insurance rates on the immediate coast which might force the issue, so who knows.
#20
Posted 07 April 2007 - 12:11 PM
I think the state should work on recruiting large scale agriculture to this part of the state. For example like large scale agriculture, like with huge farms for meat and processing. Those are things that you can't really get from China. Also trying to attract military contractors to the area. We have a few bases here and the Hampton Roads area isn't that far away, which is home to one of the country's largest military population.
If the government could get their act together and we could find a way to make cost of manufacturing Ethanol more affordable, eastern NC abundant amount of fertile farm land could be used to fuel the country and Eastern NC. Think of how much the Saudi's make in fuel, imagine some of that money coming here.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













