The Promenade At Chenal
#1
Posted 08 February 2007 - 10:52 PM
So, how about giving this major retail project its own thread?
A couple of descriptive passages from PAC’s page on RED Development’s website read as follows:
“The Promenade at Chenal, a 340,000-square-foot, open-air, lifestyle center, is located in Chenal Valley in west Little Rock, Ark. The shopping center will be home to a variety of upscale national, regional and local retailers, restaurant and entertainment venues.
The center will be designed in a French Gothic style. The open-air design of the center replicates a nostalgic Main Street shopping district. Vehicular access to the Main Street allows convenient parking in front of your favorite store or restaurant. Extensive sidewalks, landscaping and hardscape will create a pedestrian-friendly environment ideal for shopping, entertainment and socializing.”
RED’s website is here: http://reddevelopment.com The Promenade page can be found under the “commitment” link – “projects under development.”
One of my initial impressions is how sloped the property is. From Chenal you look down into the land, where the bulk of the building will take place. I can’t imagine that construction will begin until some of the acreage is leveled. I also realize the importance of a traffic light at Chenal and Rahling. The extension of Rahling from Chenal around the northern and western perimeter of the Promenade is well underway. The light is important, today, but I can imagine plenty of traffic in a couple of years driving along Rahling and crossing Chenal to access Promenade at Chenal and points beyond. There is plenty of construction already underway or planned on Rahling, east of Chenal. I also noticed the indications of a new turn lane emerging along Chenal, approaching La Grande (the street on the southern edge of the project).
It will be exciting to see the project take shape in the coming months, and to learn the retailers committing to it. Let’s hope for some big news.
#2
Posted 09 February 2007 - 09:10 PM
LIT uPP, on Feb 8 2007, 10:52 PM, said:
So, how about giving this major retail project its own thread?
A couple of descriptive passages from PAC’s page on RED Development’s website read as follows:
“The Promenade at Chenal, a 340,000-square-foot, open-air, lifestyle center, is located in Chenal Valley in west Little Rock, Ark. The shopping center will be home to a variety of upscale national, regional and local retailers, restaurant and entertainment venues.
The center will be designed in a French Gothic style. The open-air design of the center replicates a nostalgic Main Street shopping district. Vehicular access to the Main Street allows convenient parking in front of your favorite store or restaurant. Extensive sidewalks, landscaping and hardscape will create a pedestrian-friendly environment ideal for shopping, entertainment and socializing.”
RED’s website is here: http://reddevelopment.com The Promenade page can be found under the “commitment” link – “projects under development.”
One of my initial impressions is how sloped the property is. From Chenal you look down into the land, where the bulk of the building will take place. I can’t imagine that construction will begin until some of the acreage is leveled. I also realize the importance of a traffic light at Chenal and Rahling. The extension of Rahling from Chenal around the northern and western perimeter of the Promenade is well underway. The light is important, today, but I can imagine plenty of traffic in a couple of years driving along Rahling and crossing Chenal to access Promenade at Chenal and points beyond. There is plenty of construction already underway or planned on Rahling, east of Chenal. I also noticed the indications of a new turn lane emerging along Chenal, approaching La Grande (the street on the southern edge of the project).
It will be exciting to see the project take shape in the coming months, and to learn the retailers committing to it. Let’s hope for some big news.
#3
Posted 10 February 2007 - 12:01 PM
Architect, on Feb 9 2007, 09:10 PM, said:
I have to admit I'm less concerned about it being a "regional draw" than with it being a place that offers some new restaraunt and purchasing options. There's definitely risk there, as there is with Pleasant Ridge, but the opportunity to create a highly desirable environment is also there. I guess we'll just all have to see how it plays out.
#4
Posted 10 February 2007 - 12:15 PM
EJC, on Feb 10 2007, 12:01 PM, said:
I'm hoping we'll some "destination" stores and restaurants, place like Apple, Cheesecake Factory, etc that people from Pulaski Co will drive to just to go to, that it will be decidedly more upscale than other malls and that will be its draw along with shops and restaurants catering to the small but wealthy local crowd. As time goes on I don't think its location will be as big of an issue. Almost all of LR's growth is west of I-430 (it's probably losing people east of it) so this location will be much easier to reach as time goes on. I think the geographic location will be pretty perfect, it's really more the lack of interstate access that will be the issue.
I am with Architect in wishing for a true regional mall near I-430 instead of multiple smaller shopping centers in the area. In retrospect, I'm not so sure I should've been so anti-Summit Mall. Park Plaza probably would've been able to sustain itself with another mall further West because of the size of the region and it would've let us have a single retail focus in West LR instead of a hodgepodge of minimalls. At the same time, this is following national trends and it will have less of a traffic impact.
LitUPP, I was up there last weekend (coming up next weekend as well) and was shocked at how fast they'd cleared that land. They were obviously pretty serious about it. I guess I didn't really recognize how large the tract of land really was but it's actually pretty huge.
There's plenty of room for new commercial development behind the Promenade as well.
Edited by Aporkalypse, 10 February 2007 - 02:32 PM.
#5
Posted 11 February 2007 - 12:10 AM
#6
Posted 11 February 2007 - 02:03 PM
theman, on Feb 11 2007, 12:10 AM, said:
#7
Posted 11 February 2007 - 03:18 PM
Architect, on Feb 11 2007, 02:03 PM, said:
I agree with the risk. The people doing this seem to know what they are doing and the timing is too perfect. This project waited out the whole Summit Mall/Simon phase, waited out Midtown and then Pleasant Ridge. Pleasant Ridge was supposed to be full of tenants we all had seen rumored or in your case had actually seen the plans for, yet most of the bigger names that weren't anchors (Fresh Market, Parisian, Borders) held out for something better. All of the sudden RED closes on the land and now dozes the whole site in basically no time? The timing just suggests to me that RED got a lot of Schickel's preferred tenants to jump ship to their development, possibly because they already had other similar tenants going with them. If that's the case there's much less risk to this project.
If the development caters to six-figure incomers living in West LR or in the Heights its location is fine, it doesn't need to have easy interstate access to people from places like Malvern and Jacksonville that don't know LR. If it's more of a middle-end development it would be a huge problem.
I would wager Deltic put a million specifications on what they want this project to be like, especially regarding facades and types of restaurants. They've kept out fast food and cheaper businesses and I'm sure they won't allow Promenade to be anything but first rate because if it were it would affect their bottom line.
#8
Posted 11 February 2007 - 03:37 PM
#9
Posted 11 February 2007 - 03:46 PM
Aporkalypse, on Feb 11 2007, 03:18 PM, said:
If the development caters to six-figure incomers living in West LR or in the Heights its location is fine, it doesn't need to have easy interstate access to people from places like Malvern and Jacksonville that don't know LR. If it's more of a middle-end development it would be a huge problem.
I would wager Deltic put a million specifications on what they want this project to be like, especially regarding facades and types of restaurants. They've kept out fast food and cheaper businesses and I'm sure they won't allow Promenade to be anything but first rate because if it were it would affect their bottom line.
hartford, on Feb 11 2007, 03:37 PM, said:
#10
Posted 11 February 2007 - 06:40 PM
Architect, on Feb 11 2007, 03:46 PM, said:
Which begs to ask the question - what the hell is going in to Kelley and Dailey's project over on Col Glenn and 430? I can't figure that out. 500,000 SF in two phases? I just can't think what that would be. I want to see a Macy's and Costco somewhere in the west LR mix but those belong in two very different kinds of developments. At the very least I'm optimistic we're about to get a lot of stores we don't have.
I actually thought Midtowne was perfect for Apple and especially Restoration Hardware. Where else do you see so much restoration? More updating of classic older homes happens in LR in an area within 5 miles of that than in many cities 5 times LR's size.
#11
Posted 11 February 2007 - 06:51 PM
Architect, on Feb 11 2007, 03:46 PM, said:
Are you sure about the Apple Store? Both the Apple and Saddle Creek web sites have it still open. The Apple-Saddle Creek site has the schedule of workshops etc. through February.
#12
Posted 11 February 2007 - 07:22 PM
LRU1967, on Feb 11 2007, 06:51 PM, said:
#13
Posted 11 February 2007 - 08:31 PM
Architect, on Feb 11 2007, 07:22 PM, said:
I bought a mac there last week, and the sales rep told me the store has been very successful. On the tax holiday, there were hundreds of people in line in the parking lot.
#15
Posted 11 February 2007 - 09:11 PM
I’m excited about this project not just because of the potentially new shopping experiences it will bring, but because it is a vote of confidence in Little Rock’s future by people who have a lot riding on that future.
#16
Posted 11 February 2007 - 09:28 PM
LIT uPP, on Feb 11 2007, 09:11 PM, said:
I’m excited about this project not just because of the potentially new shopping experiences it will bring, but because it is a vote of confidence in Little Rock’s future by people who have a lot riding on that future.
#17
Posted 11 February 2007 - 11:34 PM
Aporkalypse, on Feb 11 2007, 06:40 PM, said:
I was wondering the same thing. Are they going to go after a totally different demographic than Shackleford Crossing or some of the same type of retailers? In the article they said they wanted to complement Shackleford Crossing. It will be interesting to see how they are going to do that.
#18
Posted 12 February 2007 - 10:37 AM
#19
Posted 12 February 2007 - 06:41 PM
theman, on Feb 11 2007, 11:34 PM, said:
I was expecting it to be a little higher end, I'm not sure how it could be the same or lower because who would those tenants be?
I'm not sure if they're going for traditional mall tenants or big boxes.
What I do know is the restaurant market in LR is really looking up right now.
#20
Posted 26 February 2007 - 03:01 PM
Aporkalypse, on Feb 12 2007, 06:41 PM, said:
I'm not sure if they're going for traditional mall tenants or big boxes.
What I do know is the restaurant market in LR is really looking up right now.
RED is in trouble in several locations already. Buildings and projects promised that
were not completed even in their own back yard, KC. Lots of hype but no cred.
Hope it happens as that WAS a beautiful site, but I'm not counting on anything but
local retail...........it's adjacent to millions of square feet of strip center .
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users













