andyfried, on Mar 22 2007, 12:22 PM, said:
The southern part of suffolk is just as far away from downtown as the northern part is.Suffolk is a very big city and downtown is right in the middle.Southern suffolk is very rural ,and downtown is like a little urban core.Northern Suffolk was very much like southern suffolk until the last couple of years.They shouldn't neglect downtown because I think it has great potential.I'm amazed at the amount of development in the north.I'm not complaining at least we are getting some great developments somewhere in the city.
I agree, don't forget, i did grow up there and am very, very familiar with the make up of Suffolk. I just think it should of been broken into two cities when it became a city. I think at this point in time it would make more sense because the north end is coming on new development and I suspect the city of Suffolk might start pulling a Chesapeake and forget about their downtown and start focusing on a new area. I do hope I am wrong with this, but if it were two cities, this wouldn't even be an issue. Now saying that, I could be totally wrong about Suffolk, they could use this new amount of tax dollars to help revive their downtown because, unlike Chesapeake, Suffolk's city government is downtown, so there are city officials that see downtown Suffolk everyday.
And yes I totally agree about downtown Suffolk. It has the potential to be a great little downtown and be a greater service the the area that surrounds it. But to do that, they will have to improve the job market downtown and make it attractive to new development. At its current state, with the exception of a couple improvements, it is mostly a rundown downtown....but not a done for downtown.