Buckhead Developments
#1
Posted 12 April 2007 - 08:22 PM
Over the next couple of days, I may be adding a few of the more recent posts from the old Atlanta Highrise Boom thread that I find relevant. Until then, feel free to visit the topic here (it’s locked, though, so nothing new can be posted there).
EDIT: I have looked back on quite a few of the most recent pages of the thread and haven't found much yet that couldn't be easily replicated here. You may, for now, however, be interested in Martinman's citywide updates post from back in March.
Please note that this is a discussion thread for urban developments and projects of all sorts, not just skyscrapers. Information about skyscrapers is by all means welcome because they are a part of an urban environment, but they are not the only part of an urban environment.
Also, for news clippings and articles, please do be mindful of UrbanPlanet’s article posting policy.
Small clippings (if the source allows it) of two sentences are allowed with a summary that's at least a sentence or two long by the poster. The link to the article must also be supplied.
DO NOT POST ENTIRE ARTICLES OR JUST LINKS!
For more information, please visit UrbanPlanet’s Forum Rules in the Urban Planet Information forum.
If you have any questions, please feel free to PM me and I'll do my best to answer them.
#2
Posted 20 April 2007 - 08:14 AM
10 Terminus Place is a 142-unit condo building that is under construction above the parking structure and Terminus 200, a 25-story office building will break ground in May.
#3
Posted 21 April 2007 - 06:48 AM
Martinman, on Apr 20 2007, 09:14 AM, said:
Gee, I was just reading that article on the front page of the Atlanta Business Chronicle. There's sure a lot of new office space coming online at once -- between the two Terminus buildings, 3344 Peachtree, 3630 Peachtree and the additional Alliance Center tower that's 2.6 million sf. That's like putting up four 1180 Peachtree buildings at once. And that's in addition to another 1.3 million sf in Midtown.
I guess they are proceeding on the build-it-and-they-will-come theory, but I wonder where all the tenants will come from.
Edited by Andrea, 21 April 2007 - 06:50 AM.
#4
Posted 21 April 2007 - 05:37 PM
#7
Posted 23 April 2007 - 10:26 AM
200 Terminus (office tower)
10 Terminus (condo tower on top of the parking deck)
I like seeing that both buildings are including ground level retail. While I like all the buildings individually, they fit together almost too perfectly, making the complex look a bit monotnous. None the less, its better to have good design monotony, rather that a bunch of precast concrete boxes.
#8
Posted 23 April 2007 - 10:48 AM
Martinman, on Apr 23 2007, 09:29 AM, said:
Martinman, I'm sure you're right although sometimes I wonder. What happened with that Peachtree Pointe building in Midtown, for instance? That place looks vacant to me. And I think the developer of Two Alliance Center was quoted as saying they were going ahead even without any tenants.
What I know about commercial real estate wouldn't fill a thimble, however. I guess that's why those guys are billionaires and I'm still a wage slave.
#9
Posted 23 April 2007 - 03:07 PM
Andrea, on Apr 23 2007, 12:48 PM, said:
What I know about commercial real estate wouldn't fill a thimble, however. I guess that's why those guys are billionaires and I'm still a wage slave.
Yeah I meant that that will be the case for most of them but even the case of Two Alliance, that pronouncement might just be a bit of posturing to draw attention to the development. Come to think of it, almost all of those referenced in the ABC article have said basically the same thing at one time or another.
I do know that the office space planned for Midtown is being timed to coincide with the final years of some large leases.
The Peachtree Pointe building was 100% spec developed by favorite forum whipping boy Dewberry. It was considered unwise at the time, despite a strong Midtown market and is still empty as far as I know. I think this is the exception and not the rule.
Edited by Martinman, 23 April 2007 - 04:50 PM.
#10
Posted 25 April 2007 - 01:46 PM
Basically, the push in the spec office market is a bet that the metro will continue to build new business, attract corporate relocations and expand existing businesses. As long as developers are willing to wait for a sizable nibble from a tenant before building, the market should stay relatively stable.
#11
Posted 27 April 2007 - 05:46 AM
Edited by Martinman, 27 April 2007 - 05:46 AM.
#14
Posted 29 April 2007 - 12:40 PM
Edited by Martinman, 02 May 2007 - 10:54 AM.
#15
Posted 29 April 2007 - 06:11 PM
#16
Posted 30 April 2007 - 07:08 PM
#17
Posted 30 April 2007 - 07:45 PM
GRguy, on Apr 30 2007, 08:08 PM, said:
The left side of the building does look a lot nicer then the right. The left side has a more historic look while the right has the more modern look. It doesn't make sense on why they would make the building half and half though.
#18
Posted 30 April 2007 - 09:03 PM
razorbackfan, on Apr 30 2007, 08:45 PM, said:
Might be to cater to more potential buyers. Some might prefer the floor-to-ceiling glass on the left side, others might prefer the more historic style.
#19
Posted 02 May 2007 - 08:42 AM

And here's a view, from left to right, of cranes for Parc @ Buckhead, The Mansion, and 3344 with Terminus on the right.
Edited by Martinman, 02 May 2007 - 08:43 AM.
#20
Posted 02 May 2007 - 04:50 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













