Economic developments in the Midlands
#21
Posted 30 June 2007 - 09:12 PM
#22
Posted 02 July 2007 - 06:19 AM
#23
Posted 05 July 2007 - 03:17 PM
August: 4,300 (ranked 1st)
September: 2,300 (1st)
October: 1,800 (2nd)
November: 2,600 (1st)
December: 1,700 (1st)
January: all metro areas experienced job losses
February: 2,500 (2nd)
March: 2,600 (2nd)
April: 2,000 (2nd)
Also, all of the gains have not been in government, either. Many of them have been in the trade and transportation sector.
Source
#24
Posted 05 July 2007 - 06:46 PM
#25
Posted 05 July 2007 - 09:54 PM
#26
Posted 05 July 2007 - 10:03 PM
Edited by waccamatt, 05 July 2007 - 10:10 PM.
#27
Posted 05 July 2007 - 10:05 PM
#29
Posted 07 July 2007 - 02:37 AM
So almost half of the SC companies recognized for flourishing due to international trade are in the Greater Columbia area. That's good stuff.
#30
Posted 24 July 2007 - 04:47 PM
Columbia's got some work to do here. Florida's metro areas scored pretty well.
#31
Posted 08 August 2007 - 01:26 PM
http://www.midlandsbiz.com/
#32
Posted 08 August 2007 - 06:55 PM
#33
Posted 08 August 2007 - 07:11 PM
In other news, apparently income growth in metro Columbia lags the national average. After inflation, average income per person rose 2% in the Columbia area last year, compared with an average of 2.6% among the nation's 363 metropolitan areas. In the six-county Columbia MSA, personal income averaged $32,308 in 2006, according to the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. The state’s per capita income is about 16% less than the U.S. average of $36,307, while the Columbia area’s is 11% less than the national average.
According to Ike McLeese, president of the Greater Columbia Chamber of Commerce, Columbia metro area’s income and growth in income has been weakened by the expansion of the metro area’s definition to include the more rural and less wealthy economies of Calhoun, Fairfield, Kershaw and Saluda. The Columbia metro area ranked higher in previous years when it had been defined as Richland and Lexington counties.
For comparative purposes, Charleston's per capita income rose by 2.2%, Greenville's by 1.8%, Augusta's by 0.7%, and Charlotte's by 1.2%. Columbia has the 2nd highest per capita income average in SC; Charleston's is about $80 higher, and Greenville's stands at $30,809. Augusta's is $29,342, while Charlotte's is $38,223.
#34
Posted 10 August 2007 - 10:21 PM
#35
Posted 16 August 2007 - 08:23 PM
#36
Posted 30 August 2007 - 12:57 AM
#38
Posted 23 September 2007 - 11:44 PM
Calhoun County has been the target of significant investment as of late. That's good, because it spreads the wealth throughout metro Columbia.
#39
Posted 02 October 2007 - 10:25 PM
#40
Posted 07 October 2007 - 12:19 AM
news about the future of I-78
http://www.thestate....ory/193892.html
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













