Economic developments in the Midlands
#41
Posted 07 October 2007 - 01:39 AM
#42
Posted 07 October 2007 - 10:52 AM
#43
Posted 08 October 2007 - 08:43 AM
http://www.swampfox....s-basic-search/
#44
Posted 10 October 2007 - 04:02 PM
http://www.centralsc...0... es msa.pdf
#45
Posted 11 October 2007 - 11:08 AM
http://uscnews.sc.edu/MEDC288-07.html
#46
Posted 05 November 2007 - 02:53 PM
#47
Posted 06 November 2007 - 08:12 PM
#48
Posted 07 November 2007 - 07:28 AM
#49
Posted 07 November 2007 - 09:47 AM
#50
Posted 09 November 2007 - 09:42 PM
Quote
#51
Posted 09 November 2007 - 09:46 PM
#52
Posted 10 November 2007 - 08:57 AM
#53
Posted 10 November 2007 - 12:31 PM
#54
Posted 25 November 2007 - 08:00 PM
#55
Posted 03 December 2007 - 09:54 AM
http://www.expansion.....020 RE(1).PDF
#56
Posted 03 December 2007 - 10:01 AM
CorgiMatt, on Dec 3 2007, 10:54 AM, said:
http://www.expansion.....020 RE(1).PDF
#57
Posted 03 December 2007 - 12:25 PM
CorgiMatt, on Dec 3 2007, 10:54 AM, said:
http://www.expansion.....020 RE(1).PDF
The Expansion Management ranking actually lists all of SC's major metros, with GSP ranking 3rd and Charleston ranking 13th. Good press for the entire state!
#58
Posted 06 December 2007 - 02:42 PM
#59
Posted 06 December 2007 - 05:14 PM
The article said that they don't know what will happen to the current building. Now my question is, if the VA can't install new technology, does that mean other investors won't either? This is a solid mid-rise building, albeit a low-profile one.
Article
#60
Posted 06 December 2007 - 06:44 PM
I don't really think it was so much that new technology couldn't be installed, but that the agency really didn't want to do it. I say raze the building and build something taller and more modern.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













