The Dash Downtown Ballpark
#41
Posted 10 November 2006 - 03:54 PM
#42
Posted 13 November 2006 - 07:18 AM
yadkinv, on Nov 10 2006, 04:54 PM, said:
I think one reason could be the fact the attendance in Greensboro has just about been always higher than the warthogs. However a new downtown stadium would cause atendance to shoot up like it did in Greensboro. First Horizon Park is designed to expand to AAA so im guessing Winston's park may likely be expandable too. Anyways this is great for the downtown area. The only thing is I wish the stadium would be built closer to the core of downtown near the towers.
Edited by cityboi, 13 November 2006 - 07:19 AM.
#43
Posted 13 November 2006 - 09:47 AM
cityboi, on Nov 13 2006, 08:18 AM, said:
Why the desire the build this closer to the core of downtown? Wouldn't that require destroying a number of historic buildings on the north or east side which are ripe for redevelopment? Or, alternatively, take land from the PTRP? The PTRP site doesn't seem well suited for the development of nightlife...
The location that was selected for the ballpark should encourage development of the fourth street corridor (from the Nissen Building to the 4th and Broad Condos) and Broad Street.
#44
Posted 07 December 2006 - 04:14 PM
The city and the owners of the Winston-Salem Warthogs have agreed upon the terms of a $170 million joint venture to build a new stadium and office-retail-residential complex on the western edge of downtown.
The project, three years in the making, includes a $22.6 million, 5,500-seat stadium for the Warthogs that could be open in time for the 2008 season if things worked right with construction.
The partnership between the city and Sports Menagerie, the entity that owns the Warthogs and which has Billy Prim and Andrew "Flip" Filipowski as its principal partners, calls for the city to spend $11 million and Sports Menagerie $11.6 million to build the stadium.
The city intends to finance its share of the $11 million but not have to use existing tax dollars. It said it would pay its share of the $1 million annual finance payments from several sources, including: annual payments by Wake Forest University, which will buy Ernie Shore Field; $350,000 in annual surcharges on tickets, a figure guaranteed by Sports Menagerie regardless of Warthogs attendance; additional tax payments on the 9-acre stadium site; and money from the city's economic development fund.
Likewise, Sports Menagerie is using a variety of finances, including private financing, federal grants, a loan from the non-profit Millennium Fund and other means to pay its share of the stadium.
The city and developers said the project would help boost the city's economy and revitalize the western edge of Winston-Salem's downtown, where nearby, the West End Village condominium complex already is under way.
A downtown stadium in Greensboro that opened in 2005 has more than doubled average attendance at games for its minor league team and helped boost downtown revitalization efforts.
#45
Posted 07 December 2006 - 05:08 PM
#46
Posted 07 December 2006 - 05:14 PM
#47
Posted 07 December 2006 - 05:15 PM


this is going to be HUGE for Winston!!!!
im also excited to hear that Ernie Shore Field will not go to waste. maybe this will strengthen ties between deacon boulevard and the Reynolda campus.
Edited by twincity, 07 December 2006 - 05:16 PM.
#48
Posted 07 December 2006 - 05:27 PM
#49
Posted 07 December 2006 - 06:55 PM
#50
Posted 07 December 2006 - 09:33 PM
I can't wait for the '08 season for the Warthogs to begin!!
#51
Posted 08 December 2006 - 08:14 AM
#52
Posted 08 December 2006 - 11:17 AM
yadkinv, on Dec 8 2006, 10:14 AM, said:
Why go to a 12 story building? I do not see any particular advantages in it especially in that part of the city as it will be the only tower in the neighbourhood. The four story buildings promote infill development and in this sort of development gives you far more street level retail space which will be essential for developing an entertainment complex of bars and restaurants around the ballpark. What would be preferable, walking past a frontage of 100 ft for a tower along with the parking lots surrounding it or perhaps 500-600ft of various retail shops, bars and so forth with parking tuck away behind?
#53
Posted 08 December 2006 - 03:53 PM
ncbrian, on Dec 8 2006, 12:17 PM, said:
#54
Posted 11 December 2006 - 10:26 AM
#55
Posted 13 December 2006 - 12:19 PM
Edited by cityboi, 13 December 2006 - 12:20 PM.
#56
Posted 14 December 2006 - 05:34 AM
#57
Posted 14 December 2006 - 05:36 PM
suburban george3, on Dec 14 2006, 06:34 AM, said:

The overlay seems to show that the 2 gas stations on Broad and 1st will remain. Those two should be bought out / shut down as there is a crime problem at both of them.
#58
Posted 14 December 2006 - 05:55 PM
But....come to think of it, I only use that exit when I go out drinking with friends, so maybe it's the driver? LOL, j/k
#59
Posted 15 December 2006 - 12:34 PM
#60
Posted 22 December 2006 - 04:37 PM
transitman, on Dec 15 2006, 01:34 PM, said:
Agreed! Also, they shouldn't front any of the streets with parking (eg. at the corner of Broad and Brookstown). They should build out all of the street frontage to give it a true urban feel that ties it to the Burke Street area and to West End Village.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













