Concord in the midst of major changes?
#21
Posted 28 June 2007 - 08:16 AM
#23
Posted 30 June 2007 - 04:35 PM
Today's Observer has an article on the redevelopment of the site. Apparently Concord city officials are going to try to restrain growth and will try to prevent any new housing being built there. Instead, they hope to attract another industry to the site, such as a pharmaceutical or automotive company.
#24
Posted 30 June 2007 - 04:54 PM
#25
Posted 15 August 2007 - 04:52 AM
#26
Posted 15 August 2007 - 07:31 AM
Raintree21, on Aug 15 2007, 06:52 AM, said:
I heard shortly after this move was announced that a lot of the PM employees would not be leaving the area. Instead they would take the severance package. Not sure if adding $50k to the pot would change their minds or not.
#27
Posted 31 August 2007 - 10:15 PM
link
#28
Posted 19 September 2007 - 10:19 PM
I was just curious seeing that cranes aren't really common sights in Concord and all.
#29
Posted 20 September 2007 - 07:03 AM
aussie luke, on Sep 20 2007, 12:19 AM, said:
I was just curious seeing that cranes aren't really common sights in Concord and all.
This is for the wind tunnel project that was announced a few months ago. There is also a new fire department under construction in close proximity to this development as well as a new office building in the airport complex.
You can view image updates to this project (including aerials of the construction progress) by visiting the following website: http://www.windshear...ages.htm#Images
Here is a rendering of the completed building:
#30
Posted 20 September 2007 - 08:54 AM
It's highly unlikely that it will be a park. There is no revenue from a park. They have to try to replace the tax money lost from PM moving.
What they are hoping is that a big company will come in and put a plant there. That's probably the most likely scenario, that or it sits there because they won't parcel it up.
Quote
“We are looking for job creation,” Hiatt said.
IndependentTribune.com -- Development plans for Philip Morris site unclear
#31
Posted 20 September 2007 - 04:24 PM
As for the PM land. While it would be a nice boost to the tax base if another manufacturer would move in there, I hope that, even if that does happen, they use most of the rest of the land for other multi-use development that would benefit that area. I just hope that the city knows not to allow yet another strip mall to hit 29.
#32
Posted 20 September 2007 - 10:47 PM
aussie luke, on Sep 20 2007, 06:24 PM, said:
I too was wondering what was going on there and I too had no idea that the Wind Tunnel was so far along in the construction process thanks Neo for the insight and the link
#33
Posted 21 September 2007 - 06:50 AM
aussie luke, on Sep 20 2007, 06:24 PM, said:
As for the PM land. While it would be a nice boost to the tax base if another manufacturer would move in there, I hope that, even if that does happen, they use most of the rest of the land for other multi-use development that would benefit that area. I just hope that the city knows not to allow yet another strip mall to hit 29.
There is a mixed used development that will start construction soon (permit is currently awaiting resubmittal which is common) off of Hwy. 29 at Concord Farms Rd. which is pretty close to the PM site. It contains a few dozen town homes, commercial, retail, single family homes, etc. I imagine it is something along the lines of a Birkdale type development. I could give you the specific numbers on how many units of what are going to be available but the permitting database for the city seems to be down at the moment.
I have also been in talks with NCDOT on the extension of George Liles to Roberta Church Rd. Apparently they were originally planning to put an interchange at Hwy. 29 and Roberta at Christy's Nursury but to speed up the project they have decided to scratch those plans. It is number two in priority after the widening of I-85.
#34
Posted 21 September 2007 - 07:55 AM
I didn't know about the Concord Farms development either. That's big news. I hate that they are putting it on that road though; I've always enjoyed driving down that twisty road through the farmland there. Back when I was in high school, that road was the scene for pretty much every student to put the peddle to the floor after school. While not the safest road to do that, there wasn't anywhere for police cars to hide, so it made the perfect place to see what your car had. Back to the topic though, I'm surprised that they would choose to place such a development on such a highly used road that already can't normally handle the traffic it currently has to begin with. If this is indeed built, then there will have to be a traffic signal on 29 there and significant road improvements. Hopefully this also means that they will curb 29 along this stretch. That is one thing that has bothered me about 29 in Concord, south of S&D coffee, there is absolutely no curbing at all except at Pitts School Rd and again right before you hit Meck County at Morehead.
In hindsight though, it is good that Concord is realizing that strip malls have ruined their city's main thoroughfare and is promoting more mixed use developments. It's too bad they didn't figure this out BEFORE Concord Mills Blvd was developed.
#35
Posted 21 September 2007 - 08:36 AM
The master plan is to extend George Liles as a four lane road to Hwy 49. In talking with the NCDOT about this plan they are backing off a little on getting this four laned and are apparently now exploring the idea of it just being the current two lane version due to time and costs. This is a terrible idea, especially if Concord continues to allow development along the George Liles corridor as they have been.
In addition, there is a planned big box development for Stough Rd. and Hwy 49 which would ultimately be the terminus of the George Liles Pkwy extension. You can read more about that here:
[color= #D82000; font-weight: bold;] See this on the UP Wiki: [/color]http://www.urbanplan...ki/external.png) center right no-repeat; padding-right: 13px; border-bottom: 1px dotted #3366BB; color: #3366BB; cursor:pointer; text-decoration:none;" class="wiki">Morrison Ridge Shopping Center
#36
Posted 21 September 2007 - 10:12 AM
aussie luke, on Sep 1 2007, 12:15 AM, said:
#37
Posted 21 September 2007 - 02:50 PM
Neo, on Sep 21 2007, 08:50 AM, said:
57 single family homes
46 town homes
4 commercial
I will also note that this has completed review and given the green light so dirt should begin to turn very soon for this project.
#38
Posted 22 September 2007 - 09:30 AM
#39
Posted 24 September 2007 - 09:01 AM
aussie luke, on Sep 22 2007, 11:30 AM, said:
#40
Posted 27 September 2007 - 07:52 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













