http://tinyurl.com/2ev2vm
Good points:
1) Higher density housing (17+ units per acre for the new development...that's pretty solid)
2) Walkable construction (developer seeks a setback of 40' compared to the current zoning of 58')
3) Re-use of existing land vs. sprawl (not that EGR has sprawl options...it's primarily built out)
4) The homes being removed are (to the casual pedestrian at least) some of the more run down homes in EGR.
Bad points:
1) Price point on brand new town-homes in EGR is going to be higher than the existing housing that street (which is probably some of the cheapest housing in town based on the condition of the homes that are to be removed)
Edited by suydam, 07 August 2007 - 11:07 AM.
















