Charlotte Knights AAA Ballpark in Third Ward
#41
Posted 04 September 2007 - 11:55 AM
I've actaully changed my tune. Thought I'm not a big proponent of the ballpark there, I do think that if Charlotte ever gets a major league team, they should find a way to expand this park. They actually spent some effort making it fit into an urban street grid, and it makes it somewhat unique. Fenway Park is special to Boston because of the way it fits into the streetscape, and isn't some generic dome on a large parcel of land.
I realize how difficult it would be to go from 10k to 40k seats, but they should at least have some conceptual idea of how upper decks could be added so that it is in theory at least possible to add them in the future.
As far at the future building envelope, I'd like to see a hotel, with exterior balconies facing the park. The Knights could receive revenue from the hotel for rooms facing the field on game days.
#42
Posted 04 September 2007 - 12:17 PM
charlotte49ersuptown, on Sep 4 2007, 01:41 PM, said:
I actually like this site plan. I'm glad to see that they are incorporating a restaurant in the plan as well. Wonder what that may be? I think something like a Buffalo Wild Wings would be a great fit. As far as that development "envelope" goes, I think putting a hotel or mid-rise condos/office buildings would be a logical fit. Or maybe that's left open for expanding the stadium if down the road we land a MLB team
#43
Posted 04 September 2007 - 12:32 PM
rockhilljames, on Aug 9 2007, 08:37 AM, said:
I do agree, It should be about having a spectaular facility that reflect Charlott'e big time thinking and not just settling for anything just because its uptown. This stadium should be THE BEST minor league ballpark in the country. $30 million seems kind of low for a AAA stadium, considering most new AA ready ballparks like in downtown Greensboro were around $25 million. And I think the planned downtown ballpark in Winston-Salem is $27 million and thats a 5,000 seat Single A stadium
Edited by cityboi, 04 September 2007 - 12:37 PM.
#44
Posted 04 September 2007 - 12:34 PM
#45
Posted 04 September 2007 - 12:42 PM
cityboi, on Sep 4 2007, 12:32 PM, said:
#46
Posted 04 September 2007 - 12:43 PM
dbull75, on Sep 4 2007, 02:17 PM, said:
As long as it's not elitist and overly expensive like the restaurant at the Bobcat's arena I'll be happy. A nice, fairly inexpensive sports bar that can be open on days that aren't game days would be great.
#47
Posted 04 September 2007 - 12:50 PM
tiblerbrit, on Sep 4 2007, 12:42 PM, said:
In the case of Greensboro it was a county land swap too. Greensboro's stadium was around $25 million.
A number of AAA ballparks across the country are costing around $45 million which is why I thought $30 million was kinda low. If the county land is worth about $15 million than that would average about right.
Edited by cityboi, 04 September 2007 - 01:15 PM.
#48
Posted 04 September 2007 - 01:05 PM
#49
Posted 06 September 2007 - 08:20 AM
#50
Posted 06 September 2007 - 08:31 AM
#51
Posted 06 September 2007 - 08:36 AM
cityboi, on Sep 4 2007, 02:50 PM, said:
A number of AAA ballparks across the country are costing around $45 million which is why I thought $30 million was kinda low. If the county land is worth about $15 million than that would average about right.
And WCNC also says in their article that the county is pitching in $8 million in addition to the Knights paying $35 million so that comes out to $43 million. I know some of that is roads and infrastructure improvements but it's still $13 million more than the $30 million figure.
#52
Posted 06 September 2007 - 10:15 AM
#53
Posted 06 September 2007 - 12:54 PM
#54
Posted 06 September 2007 - 02:35 PM
Raintree21, on Sep 6 2007, 10:31 AM, said:
WCNC has changed their story to say it's just soil sampling however they are still saying that the county is helping finance the stadium. I know that they are not paying for the stadium, just the infrastructure that was needed anyways, but that's what they are reporting.
Edited by Raintree21, 06 September 2007 - 02:39 PM.
#55
Posted 06 September 2007 - 05:13 PM
It is blatantly false that the county is funding the stadium. The county might be subsidizing the land or the county might be supporting the stadium by building sidewalks for county tax payers that show up at the games (as well as to the county park and the football stadium and to the train station and the federal courthouse and the countless other projects that are going on in this area generating far more tax revenue than these sidewalks and lane-paint will cost). But it would take far more difficulty to explain the nuances to the idiots that read their teleprompters on air, let alone take away from precious commercial time by actually explaining those nuances on air.
This is the 21st century, where we can bypass that very inefficient and often invalid source of old news by going straight to the blogosphere. This is now the third or fourth time in recent memory the facts that have already been established on UP have been tainted by false reporting by TV 'news'. Let's just skip that process.
Just my opinion, but I boycott those jokers for a reason, and I hate to see their stupidity bleed onto this board.
The county isn't funding this stadium, they are simply forgoing rent on the land in order to make the project happen, yielding higher tax proceeds from the increase in value for the whole area.
Can you imagine if WCNC sat at one of the banks and tried to report on a business deal in ultra-dumbed down black and white terms? "Today, WCNC has uncovered a scandal at a local bank uptown. Our sources have revealed that the bank has not paid as much interest to their customers as they make on the money in the account. The bank has used other investments to create what organized crime circles term 'profits'. These 'profits' have bilked YOU, their customers, out of BILLIONS of dollars in interest."
Back to the original point, I'm sure that WCNC doesn't even know that the county will pay back the $8m for the streets and sidewalks with tax money collected from the Knights on land that doesn't get any tax revenue right now. I bet other reports from WCNC have centered on how streets are under-funded in Charlotte. I guess this doesn't count, because it is spent downtown, where people are actually doing something with their lives at dinner time, so they aren't part of WCNC viewership.
#56
Posted 11 September 2007 - 11:00 PM
I think the latest site plan for the stadium is one that I can support and is definately better than the first site plan with the diagonal parking on MLK. Suprisingly not a single person showed up for the Community Meeting for this rezoning.
I suspect that the City Council will approve this rezoning...however if they don't this would be a roadblock for the stadium being built at that site.
#57
Posted 17 September 2007 - 08:56 PM
#58
Posted 28 September 2007 - 10:53 PM
The question mark that still remains is the lawsuit against the County by Jerry Reese.
#59
Posted 11 October 2007 - 06:45 AM
#60
Posted 27 November 2007 - 11:11 AM
uptownliving, on Sep 28 2007, 11:53 PM, said:
Any update on this? Thanks.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













