Update.......Little Rock National Airport.
#41
Posted 10 September 2007 - 10:54 AM
During his speech Monday, Chao said negotiations are under way to establish a non-stop flight from Little Rock to Cancun, Mexico, sometime next year. Another flight from Little Rock to Guadalajara, Mexico, is being considered, he said.
#42
Posted 10 September 2007 - 11:27 AM
Little Rock "international" Airport.
Edited by johnnydr87, 10 September 2007 - 11:27 AM.
#43
Posted 10 September 2007 - 11:50 AM
arkansas_buff, on Sep 10 2007, 11:54 AM, said:
During his speech Monday, Chao said negotiations are under way to establish a non-stop flight from Little Rock to Cancun, Mexico, sometime next year. Another flight from Little Rock to Guadalajara, Mexico, is being considered, he said.
#44
Posted 10 September 2007 - 01:29 PM
#46
Posted 10 September 2007 - 02:21 PM
Lexy, on Sep 10 2007, 03:09 PM, said:
Im aware that right now their CUN portfolio is all A319s, im a little concerned that it may be too much airplane for LIT-CUN. CUN is more vacation oriented than demographicly oriented. LIT doesnt seem to have an abundant vacation/resort passenger base as evidenced by only one 50-seat RJ to the entire state of Florida.
If i was Fronteir and had the choice, id start with the E170 then upgrade, rather than start with the A319 and risk loosing the service 3-6 months later.
#47
Posted 10 September 2007 - 06:44 PM
RLucas83, on Sep 10 2007, 03:21 PM, said:
If i was Fronteir and had the choice, id start with the E170 then upgrade, rather than start with the A319 and risk loosing the service 3-6 months later.
While it is a good idea to start with smaller aircraft, the E170 couldn't do it because it's not certified to fly over the ocean like that. It doesn't have the range and it doesn't have the proper safety devices to accomplish flights like this. Plus, that's just too lucrative of a market for a small jet like that. If, and it's a big "IF", they start it it would be on a A319 and as it stands now Frontier doesn't even fly mainline's into LIT.
#48
Posted 14 September 2007 - 12:52 PM
In early 2008, Continental will add 27 new flights to 12 new nonstop destinations including:
New Destination Frequency Effective Date
Greensboro, N.C. (GSO) Three times daily March 3, 2008
Omaha, Neb. (OMA) Three times daily March 3, 2008
Savannah, Ga. (SAV) Twice daily March 3, 2008
Birmingham, Ala. (BHM) Twice daily April 6, 2008
Charleston, S.C. (CHS) Once daily April 6, 2008
Green Bay, Wis. (GRB) Twice daily April 6, 2008
Tulsa, Okla. (TUL) Twice daily April 6, 2008
Little Rock, Ark. (LIT) Twice daily May 4, 2008
Memphis, Tenn. (MEM) Twice daily May 4, 2008
Lansing, Mich. (LAN) Three times daily May 4, 2008
Des Moines, Iowa (DSM) Twice daily June 12, 2008
Kalamazoo, Mich. (AZO) Three times daily June 12, 2008
#49
Posted 14 September 2007 - 03:17 PM
RLucas83, on Sep 14 2007, 01:52 PM, said:
In early 2008, Continental will add 27 new flights to 12 new nonstop destinations including:
New Destination Frequency Effective Date
Greensboro, N.C. (GSO) Three times daily March 3, 2008
Omaha, Neb. (OMA) Three times daily March 3, 2008
Savannah, Ga. (SAV) Twice daily March 3, 2008
Birmingham, Ala. (BHM) Twice daily April 6, 2008
Charleston, S.C. (CHS) Once daily April 6, 2008
Green Bay, Wis. (GRB) Twice daily April 6, 2008
Tulsa, Okla. (TUL) Twice daily April 6, 2008
Little Rock, Ark. (LIT) Twice daily May 4, 2008
Memphis, Tenn. (MEM) Twice daily May 4, 2008
Lansing, Mich. (LAN) Three times daily May 4, 2008
Des Moines, Iowa (DSM) Twice daily June 12, 2008
Kalamazoo, Mich. (AZO) Three times daily June 12, 2008
Do you know if any of the new destinations from Cleveland are mainline?
#52
Posted 16 September 2007 - 05:54 PM
Architect, on Sep 14 2007, 09:53 PM, said:
Well I agree that markets such as MEM and OMA, and heck even BNA, should be mainline. The problem is that the amount of mainline aircraft that Continental has is much less than the demand for them. Basically, only the markets that comand a high yield on aircraft, such as the Boeing 737-500, get the mainline flights. Places like New Orleans, Oklahoma City, Tulsa, Orlando, etc. The rest of the country is left to fend for themselves with Express Jet. I hate that, but you are right about getting mainline metal in your town. It's as hard to do right now with both American and Continental as it is with Air Canada to get a non-Air Canada-Jazz flight. LOL!
Continental is expected to start taking delivery here in the next year or so on some more planes for domestic flying. Perhaps after then things will open up a bit and some markets that were once almost all mainline, like here in Nashville and other places, will once again get some mainline flights back.
#53
Posted 16 September 2007 - 08:41 PM
congrats to LIT for the extra Continental Flights to CLE. This makes up for the lost STL flights via AA.
#54
Posted 17 September 2007 - 04:43 PM
LRguy21, on Sep 16 2007, 09:41 PM, said:
congrats to LIT for the extra Continental Flights to CLE. This makes up for the lost STL flights via AA.
#56
Posted 19 September 2007 - 10:47 PM
Another interesting fact from the article was that LR National's average fares are $26 lower than Memphis. The Southwest Effect in full effect.
#57
Posted 20 September 2007 - 09:26 PM
#58
Posted 23 September 2007 - 10:52 PM
#59
Posted 24 September 2007 - 03:28 AM
LRguy21, on Sep 23 2007, 08:52 PM, said:
I believe F9 is flying the E170 between Albuquerque and Puerto Vallarta later this year...
#60
Posted 24 September 2007 - 07:39 AM
Quote
That's $200,000 in incentives for a RJ to Mexico! That's what LIT is up against! As far as WHERE this Mexico flight would be taking us...
Quote
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













