Jump to content


- - - - -

Columbus Airport


  • Please log in to reply
53 replies to this topic

#41 mitchella81

mitchella81

    Whistle-Stop

  • Members+
  • PipPipPip
  • 402 posts
  • Location:Atlanta/Columbus, GA

Posted 14 January 2009 - 09:21 AM

COLUMBUS AIRPORT POISED FOR COMEBACK

The following article was in todays newspaper

Quote

After more than a decade of nosediving passenger counts, traffic at Columbus Metropolitan Airport appears to be leveling off and possibly poised for growth.

“A lot of people do not know the fares have come down, do not know reliability has improved,” said Sherry Goodrum, an attorney entering her second year as chair of the Columbus Airport Commission.

“What we’re doing is trying to re-educate the public,” she said. “A lot of people I’ve spoken to, they’ve got a three-year-old experience and that’s the negative in their minds.”

More travelers are giving the airport a chance. Data compiled by management show the facility gaining nearly 13,000 more passengers flying into and out of Columbus last year after bottoming out at around 87,000 in 2006.

About 100,000 fliers used the facility in 2008, up from just under 92,000 the year before.

But the modest resurgence is still a far cry from the quarter of a million people who came through the doors in the early 1990s. The airport had five commercial airlines then, instead of its current lone carrier, Delta Air Lines.

After peaking at just under 250,000 passengers in 1993, traffic fell steadily as various airlines left the market.

The airport also lost business because of travelers upset about poor on-time service by airlines and exorbitantly higher fares charged to fly out of Columbus. Many customers drove or took a shuttle to Atlanta to escape the higher fares.

Airport Director Mark Oropeza said both of those issues appear to have been addressed by a Delta Air Lines that was humbled by its 2005-2007 stint in U.S. Bankruptcy Court.

“What Delta is starting to discover is when people drive to Atlanta, they don’t necessarily get on Delta. They’re choosing somebody else,” he said.

Oropeza calls it the “new Delta.”

“Since they’ve come out of bankruptcy, they’ve got a whole new management team up there,” he said. “And the management team is saying: We can’t keep doing things the way we did in the past and expect different results.”

Oropeza points to a gentleman’s agreement he has with Delta to keep fares no more than $70 higher round-trip flying out of Columbus than out of Atlanta. Anytime the fares surge higher than that spread — an increase often generated by computers — he contacts Delta and they quickly lower them.

“In the old days, Delta would say: We know what we’re doing. Take what you can get,” Oropeza said.

Business from Benning

Perhaps the biggest factor in the rising passenger counts, the director concedes, is business the airport gets from Fort Benning.

The brisk military traffic is only expected to keep rising during the next several years as the post continues its $3.5 billion transformation into an infantry-armor training center known as the Maneuver Center for Excellence. The training load will increase, thus the need for more air transportation to and from Columbus.

“Fort Benning tries to put as many of their troops through (the airport) as they can,” Oropeza said. “But we’re limited by capacity.”

That’s why he has approached Delta about adding flights or bringing in larger aircraft. The airline currently has four to five flights to and from Columbus each day, depending on peak travel seasons.

All of the flights are aboard 50-seat regional jets; no more turboprop propeller planes are used. But Oropeza would like to see some 140-seat DC9 jets.

He also hasn’t given up on attracting another airline to the city. He’s actively courting US Airways because it would funnel travelers to Charlotte, N.C., where they can choose from even more flights and fares.

“The idea is to get an air carrier that goes to someplace other than Atlanta for their hub,” Oropeza said.

Stimulus money

To prepare for the growth ahead, there are plans to go after a piece of the federal economic stimulus money pledged by President-elect Barack Obama. His administration has proposed earmarking $1 billion for a national airport improvement program.

There are two projects in Columbus that could be put out for construction bids within 30 days, Oropeza said. One is relocating and widening the airport’s main taxiway at a cost of $9 million. The other is repaving most of the facility’s runway. The price tag for that is $2 million.

Paperwork was submitted to the Federal Aviation Administration in December. If the program is approved and the Columbus projects get the go-ahead, work would begin this summer and take about 120 days to complete, Oropeza said.

“It’s a sure thing in that we’ll get these projects done even if there’s no economic stimulus package,” he said. “The thing is, though, it will take us longer because we’ll have to match the project to (FAA) funds and we may have to wait until the funds can build up enough to do the projects.”

That would likely stretch work out over three to four years, he said.

Economy takes off

A separate project, a new fire station, was just completed and turned over to the airport at the end of December. The price tag for the state-of-the-art facility was $2.5 million, all but $62,500 of that coming from federal and state funds.

With all of the pieces coming together, Goodrum said the airport is poised for a significant comeback as the economy takes off locally in coming years.

“A lot of smaller markets have lost service altogether. Macon has lost service,” she said. “I think as the economy starts to recover (airlines) will be adding more flights back in and that will mean additional opportunities for us.”

PASSENGERS AT COLUMBUS AIRPORT
1990 - 235,267
1991 - 248,757
1992 - 248,668
1993 - 249,485
1994 - 222,569
1995 - 207,089
1996 - 206,150
1997 - 202,612
1998 - 195,158
1999 - 191,297
2000 - 178,196
2001 - 155,943
2002 - 141,555
2003 - 108,787
2004 - 110,441
2005 - 98,969
2006 - 87,309
2007 - 91,754
2008 - 100,132
COLUMBUS AIRPORT SNAPSHOT
Location: 3250 West Britt David Road

Market: Columbus Metropolitan Airport's market area covers a 40-mile radius, with the airport handling more than 50,000 takeoffs and landings annually.

Impact: About 200 people are employed at the airport, which sprawls across 630 acres and has two runways totaling more than 7,000 feet. The estimated economic impact on the city is $70 million, according to an airport study.


 

#42 aboutmetro

aboutmetro

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 744 posts
  • Location:Georgia & Alabama

Posted 15 January 2009 - 09:13 AM

View Postmitchella81, on Jan 14 2009, 10:21 AM, said:

COLUMBUS AIRPORT POISED FOR COMEBACK

The following article was in todays newspaper


PASSENGERS AT COLUMBUS AIRPORT
1990 - 235,267
1991 - 248,757
1992 - 248,668
1993 - 249,485
1994 - 222,569
1995 - 207,089
1996 - 206,150
1997 - 202,612
1998 - 195,158
1999 - 191,297
2000 - 178,196
2001 - 155,943
2002 - 141,555
2003 - 108,787
2004 - 110,441
2005 - 98,969
2006 - 87,309
2007 - 91,754
2008 - 100,132
COLUMBUS AIRPORT SNAPSHOT
Location: 3250 West Britt David Road

Market: Columbus Metropolitan Airport's market area covers a 40-mile radius, with the airport handling more than 50,000 takeoffs and landings annually.

Impact: About 200 people are employed at the airport, which sprawls across 630 acres and has two runways totaling more than 7,000 feet. The estimated economic impact on the city is $70 million, according to an airport study.

That "gentleman's agreement" might be true for Delta and for 1-stop flights. Checking Orbitz, it's still alto cheaper to drive or Groome to ATL and fly.  Take for instance a flight to Vegas. From Columbus: 1-stop=$678, 2-stop=$495.  From ATL 1-stop=$608 (Orpeza's $70), but a NON-stop=$452. A USAir 1-stop = $313 (a $295 savings)...  I don't see how Columbus Metro will ever be able to compete with ATL unless the traffic at ATL just become positively unbearable.  It's landlocked so it can't grow much.  It's just stuck in a bad situation...

#43 aboutmetro

aboutmetro

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 744 posts
  • Location:Georgia & Alabama

Posted 16 January 2009 - 01:28 PM

Good article in the Washington Post regarding small city airports.

American cities have long viewed a thriving commercial airport as a source of civic pride, a way to attract businesses and jobs, a selling point promising an easy connection to the outside world. Any community vibrant enough to support a respectable airport, the thinking goes, is a community that counts.

Edited by aboutmetro, 16 January 2009 - 01:30 PM.


#44 Lady Celeste

Lady Celeste

    Burg

  • Editor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,578 posts
  • Location:Currently: NYC (10021). Second Home: Atlanta. My heart: Manalapan, Fl.

Posted 17 January 2009 - 11:28 AM

View Postaboutmetro, on Jan 15 2009, 10:13 AM, said:

That "gentleman's agreement" might be true for Delta and for 1-stop flights. Checking Orbitz, it's still alto cheaper to drive or Groome to ATL and fly.  Take for instance a flight to Vegas. From Columbus: 1-stop=$678, 2-stop=$495.  From ATL 1-stop=$608 (Orpeza's $70), but a NON-stop=$452. A USAir 1-stop = $313 (a $295 savings)...  I don't see how Columbus Metro will ever be able to compete with ATL unless the traffic at ATL just become positively unbearable.  It's landlocked so it can't grow much.  It's just stuck in a bad situation...


Yikes...that's not good. I think the coup would be for Columbus to start planning a great regional airport. There is still land available I'm sure for a large scale airport. Why not put it in Chattahoochee County. I know Harris County is out of the question...although putting one as north as possible would help Columbus snag some of Hartsfield-Jackson's regional flights.

#45 aboutmetro

aboutmetro

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 744 posts
  • Location:Georgia & Alabama

Posted 21 January 2009 - 09:43 AM

View PostLady Celeste, on Jan 17 2009, 12:28 PM, said:

Yikes...that's not good. I think the coup would be for Columbus to start planning a great regional airport. There is still land available I'm sure for a large scale airport. Why not put it in Chattahoochee County. I know Harris County is out of the question...although putting one as north as possible would help Columbus snag some of Hartsfield-Jackson's regional flights.

North and west is where growth is occurring... 64% of all new construction permits for 2008 were in Lee and Russell Counties.  Chatt has an issue with lack of transportation (as-in, no Interstate access).  If I-14 or I-22 was ever built, then maybe...

#46 mitchella81

mitchella81

    Whistle-Stop

  • Members+
  • PipPipPip
  • 402 posts
  • Location:Atlanta/Columbus, GA

Posted 21 January 2009 - 02:23 PM

Bad news out of Atlanta may siginal growth for Columbus Airport.  An Atlanta tv station is reporting that some airlines are considering pulling out of Atlanta's Hartsfield Jackson International Airport if new terms for the leases cannot be worked out. As has been discussed on this topic before Hartsfield limits CSG growth opportunities. If some airlines pull out of ATL they may consider starting service from secondary airports like COlumbus Metro to larger ones like Charlotte and Dallas just to keep a presence in the region.

#47 Lady Celeste

Lady Celeste

    Burg

  • Editor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,578 posts
  • Location:Currently: NYC (10021). Second Home: Atlanta. My heart: Manalapan, Fl.

Posted 21 January 2009 - 04:17 PM

View Postmitchella81, on Jan 21 2009, 03:23 PM, said:

Bad news out of Atlanta may siginal growth for Columbus Airport.  An Atlanta tv station is reporting that some airlines are considering pulling out of Atlanta's Hartsfield Jackson International Airport if new terms for the leases cannot be worked out. As has been discussed on this topic before Hartsfield limits CSG growth opportunities. If some airlines pull out of ATL they may consider starting service from secondary airports like COlumbus Metro to larger ones like Charlotte and Dallas just to keep a presence in the region.

That is inaccurate and surely an Atlanta TV Station would not report such an inaccuracy.

Hartsfield-Jackson currently has one of the lowest per passenger fees of major airports. Somehow (rumor) a memo was sent to airlines at Hartsfield-Jackson stating that fees could possibly double. This is not definitive and both the aiport CEO and the Atlanta mayor has said no such fee increase has even been discussed. Delta has said that if the fee is increase, it would have to shift some overflow to Memphis (a Northwest hub) or Detriot (NW hub) or Cinncinati (Delta hub) to offset the increase. They would not shift to hub cities of other airlines if they already have inherited hubs due to the recent merger.

Clarification is that they have not said they would "pull out" of Atlanta. That is a flat out falsehood that should not be repeated. Also, this is a bargining ploy because fee structures and contracts are going to be renegotiate soon between the airlines and the airport. I highly doubt Delta and Hartsfield-Jackson will part ways. Let us not rush to spreading falsehoods....especially when something can be so easily researched.

If an Atlanta TV station did report such a thing, I would like to know which one so I can send these same sentiments to their general manager. Reporting such a thing would be sloppy reporting at best and flat out juvenile at worst.

View Postaboutmetro, on Jan 21 2009, 10:43 AM, said:

North and west is where growth is occurring... 64% of all new construction permits for 2008 were in Lee and Russell Counties.  Chatt has an issue with lack of transportation (as-in, no Interstate access).  If I-14 or I-22 was ever built, then maybe...


How receptive would these locales be to having an airport in their jurisdictions?

#48 aboutmetro

aboutmetro

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 744 posts
  • Location:Georgia & Alabama

Posted 22 January 2009 - 08:40 AM

View PostLady Celeste, on Jan 21 2009, 05:17 PM, said:

That is inaccurate and surely an Atlanta TV Station would not report such an inaccuracy.

Hartsfield-Jackson currently has one of the lowest per passenger fees of major airports. Somehow (rumor) a memo was sent to airlines at Hartsfield-Jackson stating that fees could possibly double. This is not definitive and both the aiport CEO and the Atlanta mayor has said no such fee increase has even been discussed. Delta has said that if the fee is increase, it would have to shift some overflow to Memphis (a Northwest hub) or Detriot (NW hub) or Cinncinati (Delta hub) to offset the increase. They would not shift to hub cities of other airlines if they already have inherited hubs due to the recent merger.

Clarification is that they have not said they would "pull out" of Atlanta. That is a flat out falsehood that should not be repeated. Also, this is a bargining ploy because fee structures and contracts are going to be renegotiate soon between the airlines and the airport. I highly doubt Delta and Hartsfield-Jackson will part ways. Let us not rush to spreading falsehoods....especially when something can be so easily researched.

If an Atlanta TV station did report such a thing, I would like to know which one so I can send these same sentiments to their general manager. Reporting such a thing would be sloppy reporting at best and flat out juvenile at worst.




How receptive would these locales be to having an airport in their jurisdictions?

Economic Developmentally speaking, I would think very. As for the exact location.... can you say 'NIMBY'?

#49 mitchella81

mitchella81

    Whistle-Stop

  • Members+
  • PipPipPip
  • 402 posts
  • Location:Atlanta/Columbus, GA

Posted 22 January 2009 - 06:02 PM

View PostLady Celeste, on Jan 21 2009, 06:17 PM, said:

That is inaccurate and surely an Atlanta TV Station would not report such an inaccuracy.

Hartsfield-Jackson currently has one of the lowest per passenger fees of major airports. Somehow (rumor) a memo was sent to airlines at Hartsfield-Jackson stating that fees could possibly double. This is not definitive and both the aiport CEO and the Atlanta mayor has said no such fee increase has even been discussed. Delta has said that if the fee is increase, it would have to shift some overflow to Memphis (a Northwest hub) or Detriot (NW hub) or Cinncinati (Delta hub) to offset the increase. They would not shift to hub cities of other airlines if they already have inherited hubs due to the recent merger.

Clarification is that they have not said they would "pull out" of Atlanta. That is a flat out falsehood that should not be repeated. Also, this is a bargining ploy because fee structures and contracts are going to be renegotiate soon between the airlines and the airport. I highly doubt Delta and Hartsfield-Jackson will part ways. Let us not rush to spreading falsehoods....especially when something can be so easily researched.

If an Atlanta TV station did report such a thing, I would like to know which one so I can send these same sentiments to their general manager. Reporting such a thing would be sloppy reporting at best and flat out juvenile at worst.




How receptive would these locales be to having an airport in their jurisdictions?

I know it's hard to believe, but I read the article on Channel 2's website. I hate to hear the news as a native of Atlanta, but it was true I could not find the link to the article on WSBtv, but I did yahoo it and got several results quoted below is a article from a Philadelphia Newspaper that was written by Harry R. Weber for the Associated Press
Philly news article link

Article From Associated Press: Airlines Threaten to move flights from Atlanta
by Harry R. Weber


Quote

ATLANTA - Airlines that do business at the world's busiest airport are playing hardball in talks over new lease agreements, threatening to move some flights to other airports if they can't maintain competitive costs on fees they pay.

The master lease agreements that apply to airlines at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport do not expire until September 2010, but talks between the sides have already heated up.

Atlanta-based Delta Air Lines Inc., the world's biggest carrier, and discount carrier AirTran Airways, a unit of Orlando, Fla.-based AirTran Holdings Inc., say that if their costs are too high they may be forced to move some connecting flights to other airports.

Neither Delta nor AirTran is considering pulling out of Atlanta altogether.

The two carriers represent roughly 93 percent of the traffic at Hartsfield-Jackson. The other 7 percent of traffic there is split between other carriers including AMR Corp.'s American Airlines, US Airways Group Inc., Continental Airlines Inc., UAL Corp.'s United Airlines and several foreign carriers.

Airport General Manager Ben DeCosta did not return calls to his home and cell phone Monday seeking comment. An airport spokesman declined to comment.

According to the airport, all the airlines that do business at the facility are expected to generate about $160 million in airport revenue in 2009, including property leases and landing fees.

Intertwined with the talks over new lease agreements is consternation over the status of the airport's $1.6 billion international terminal project, which is in jeopardy of being halted because of the airport's inability to secure $600 million in municipal bond financing.

On Nov. 13, DeCosta told The Associated Press that tight credit markets were to blame for the airport's inability to get the bond financing.

However, according to documents obtained Monday by AP, John Boatright, Delta's vice president of corporate real estate, sent a Sept. 10 letter to prospective underwriters of the airport's bond financing stating that Delta opposed the airport's capital improvement program, which includes the terminal project.

Delta's stance could factor into the underwriters' decision because the airline is the majority tenant of Hartsfield-Jackson.

The airport, which has a good credit rating, believes that because of tight credit markets it would not have been able to go to market for the bonds regardless of Delta's position.

DeCosta said in November that the airport was seeking federal financial assistance through a stimulus package that would benefit municipal governments, and by extension the airport, which is run by the city of Atlanta. But with banks, automakers, states and even cities looking to the government for help amid the worst economic downturn in decades, it could be a tough sell for the airport, he said.

Construction work on the international terminal project at the airport began last summer and is scheduled to be completed by 2012, airport officials have said. More than $300 million has already been spent, according to DeCosta.

The plan for the Maynard H. Jackson International Terminal was part of a broader expansion project at the airport that included a fifth runway. The runway was completed in May 2006.

One of Delta's concerns has been the price of the terminal project and how that might factor into the amount of the airline's future costs for using the airport.

Boatright said in a Jan. 13 letter to DeCosta that the airline must understand its long-term financial future at the airport before it can commit to major capital investments. He cautioned that roughly two-thirds of Atlanta's traffic is able to be connected over other Delta hubs, including Memphis, Tenn.; Cincinnati; and Detroit. Delta picked up Memphis and Detroit as hubs after acquiring Northwest Airlines.

"Our position is that Delta's success in Atlanta, which translates not only to the airport's success but also the city's, is based on a foundation of a collaborative relationship that we have had with the city for more than 30 years," Delta spokeswoman Betsy Talton said.

Tad Hutcheson, a spokesman for AirTran Airways, said the carrier moved flights from Fort Walton Beach, Fla., to Pensacola, Fla., in 2001 after Fort Walton Beach raised rents. He said AirTran is working with the airport, but would consider moving some flights out of Atlanta if suitable new lease agreements can't be reached at Hartsfield-Jackson.

"We look at each flight on a flight-by-flight basis and airport costs are huge components of the cost to operate a flight," Hutcheson said. "And if those costs become uncompetitive, we will take actions up to and including canceling a flight or moving it to another city."


#50 mitchella81

mitchella81

    Whistle-Stop

  • Members+
  • PipPipPip
  • 402 posts
  • Location:Atlanta/Columbus, GA

Posted 22 January 2009 - 06:15 PM

The above article was published on1/19/09. Here is one from USA today that was published yesterday.

USA Today: Airlines Threaten to move flights to Memphis

Quote

Delta and AirTran say they might move some flights out of Atlanta if the airport does not keep costs in check. The two carriers operate large hubs there and account for about 93% of Atlanta's air traffic. The Associated Press writes the airlines apparently "are playing hardball (with the airport) in talks over new lease agreements … . The master lease agreements that apply to airlines at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport do not expire until September 2010, but talks between the sides have already heated up," AP adds.

In particular, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution says "the feud has pitted the world's busiest airport against the world's biggest airline (Delta) in a battle that involves everything from landing and gates fees to the future of the Maynard Holbrook Jackson International Terminal now under construction."

Neither Delta nor AirTran has threatened to pull out of the airport altogether, but both airlines suggest it may become financially advantageous to shift some connecting passengers and flights to other airports. The Journal-Constitution reports that John Boatright, Delta's vice president for corporate real estate, sent a two-page letter to Atlanta airport general manger Ben DeCosta in which the airline broached that possibility.

"With approximately two-thirds of Atlanta’s traffic able to be connected over other hubs (i.e. Memphis, Cincinnati or Detroit) — and the difficult economic environment facing our industry — it is more important than ever that Hartsfield-Jackson's unit costs remain competitive with those of other hub airports competing for the same connecting traffic," Boatright wrote in the letter to DeCosta, according to the Journal-Constitution. However, airport and city officials dispute Delta's projections about what the airport's future costs may look like.

As for AirTran, spokesman Tad Hutcheson says: "We look at each flight on a flight-by-flight basis and airport costs are huge components of the cost to operate a flight. And if those costs become uncompetitive, we will take actions up to and including canceling a flight or moving it to another city."

Meanwhile, the Journal-Constitution reports in a separate story that Memphis International stands ready to lure flights from Atlanta if the impasse remains unresolved. The paper writes "Memphis officials say they are not trying to take business from Atlanta but could provide a low-cost option to Delta if the airline wants to send more connecting flights through the Tennessee city." John Moore, president and CEO of the Memphis Chamber of Commerce, tells the Journal-Constitution: "The airport is in constant contact with Delta, and they are very well aware of what we offer. We sell ourselves as the best possible option for growth." Stay tuned ...


#51 aboutmetro

aboutmetro

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 744 posts
  • Location:Georgia & Alabama

Posted 22 January 2009 - 06:40 PM

View Postmitchella81, on Jan 22 2009, 07:15 PM, said:

The above article was published on1/19/09. Here is one from USA today that was published yesterday.

USA Today: Airlines Threaten to move flights to Memphis

It seems the Delta exec is suggesting they could move connecting flights to their other hubs at Memphis, Cincinnati or Detroit. I'm not sure how that translates to more traffic for the Columbus Metro.  Columbus could never handle that kind of traffic.  I tend to agree it's a negotiating strategy.

#52 j.midtown

j.midtown

    Whistle-Stop

  • Members+
  • PipPipPip
  • 152 posts
  • Location:Midtown, Atlanta

Posted 01 February 2009 - 08:15 PM

As Lady Celeste says, to use the phrase "pull out", which implies moving all operations out, is wildly inaccurate at best. Neither Delta nor AirTran could give up Atlanta completely and while AirTran has been trying to expand its routes outside of Atlanta to lessen its dependence somewhat, Delta, even the expanded version with its new-found NWA hubs, isn't going to voluntarily weaken its home fortress hub.  To do so would open room for increased competition from other airlines, including AirTran, to go after the substantial O&D traffic at HJAIA. This AJC article discusss this in more detail with air industry analysts and consultants opinions. This is simply Delta softening the ground in advance of lease negotiations and throwing its weight around as the new world's largest airline.

#53 mitchella81

mitchella81

    Whistle-Stop

  • Members+
  • PipPipPip
  • 402 posts
  • Location:Atlanta/Columbus, GA

Posted 23 May 2010 - 06:17 PM

Columbus Metro Airport lands new airline

It's been a while since some good news came out of the Columbus Airport, but beginning in July American Airlines will begin service between Columbus and Dallas, TX. This is great news despite all the bad things that are said about the Airline industry the city is able to land a new carrier in the so called bad economic times means that something can be seen on the horizion for the city and i'm leaning towards BRAC expansion.

#54 kendal 8

kendal 8

    Whistle-Stop

  • Members+
  • PipPipPip
  • 137 posts

Posted 16 July 2010 - 01:38 AM

Today was the first day of american eagle airlines in columbus at the columbus airport.The american eagle airlines will be a new airline to columbus along with delta.American eagle airlines will have two daily flights from columbus to dallas/ fort worth.The columbus airport is also trying to bring more airlines to columbus as well.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users