Columbus/PC Intown
#1
Posted 27 November 2007 - 10:51 AM
Recently, CSU has been developing some of downtown along with many, many mom & pop stores.
AFLAC has pretty much been central to any Midtown growth, but also went suburban with the East Columbus campus.
This topic is introduced to discuss the core Columbus/Phenix city development in general.
To date, there's been no brand retail activity. And no introductions of transplant HQ's into downtown. TSYS's 71-acre campus wasn't utilized in the time-frame. I don't have any images of the originally planned campus, but I seem to recall it had at least two more buildings to employ a total of 2,500 new jobs. I think acutually about 900 were created in the first phase. Will the spin-off of TSYS affect the fulfillment of that promise, either positively or negatively?
Are there any opportunities for recruiting 'new blood' for our city center, perhaps even create a skyline, or do the Bradley's have a monopoly on that in Columbus?
The downtown propmotions arem, Uptown Columbus, Inc., will not actively recruit brand retail for the district. They believe it would be detrimental. I believe it would create vigor and synergy...?
Use this thread to discuss development announcements for downtown C/PC.
#2
Posted 28 November 2007 - 10:18 AM
aboutmetro, on Nov 27 2007, 11:51 AM, said:
Recently, CSU has been developing some of downtown along with many, many mom & pop stores.
AFLAC has pretty much been central to any Midtown growth, but also went suburban with the East Columbus campus.
This topic is introduced to discuss the core Columbus/Phenix city development in general.
To date, there's been no brand retail activity. And no introductions of transplant HQ's into downtown. TSYS's 71-acre campus wasn't utilized in the time-frame. I don't have any images of the originally planned campus, but I seem to recall it had at least two more buildings to employ a total of 2,500 new jobs. I think acutually about 900 were created in the first phase. Will the spin-off of TSYS affect the fulfillment of that promise, either positively or negatively?
Are there any opportunities for recruiting 'new blood' for our city center, perhaps even create a skyline, or do the Bradley's have a monopoly on that in Columbus?
The downtown propmotions arem, Uptown Columbus, Inc., will not actively recruit brand retail for the district. They believe it would be detrimental. I believe it would create vigor and synergy...?
I am not aware of any timetable for expansion of TSYS. As you indicate, I think that there is ample space for additional buildings. I am somewhat concerned about the spin-off. I believe that it makes both Synovus and TSYS much more attractive for a buy-out. If either of both are bought-out, then there is a very real possibility that the number of jobs will not only fail to grow, but that jobs could actually be lost. Columbus has a history of losing local companies - RC, Lummus, etc. Especially worried about Synovus. As long as Blanchard was in charge, no problem. However, Anthony is from B'ham and am hoping that he is not on track to sell out to a national bank and go back home to Ala. If Synovus sells out to a national, there goes the hqs and the bragging fights to being teh hometown of one of the South's biggest regionals.
Long story short -- I am not optimistic that Synovus/Tsys will be a major player DT in the near future.
Big name retailers also not on the horizon for DT. The fear is that that would lead to the WalMart=tization of DT. Ie, it would drive out the small mom-and-pops local small businesses. I think the idea is to keep DT "quaint" and even if the population density was sufficient to warrant big name retailers, dont think that that would happen. At least not on a large scale. Maybe small boutique versions. I for one would like to see a small Barney's or Bloomies (as if!). But I suspect that the future of DT is education, hotels and restaurants and small specify shops. Actually I think that discouraging bigbox retailers is a good idea. Better to have a dozen small specialty shops occupying all those currently vacant storefronts than one large one-stop dept store.
Thus any new highrise would most likely be a new hotel near the Iron Works/Dillingham area. A much more remote possibility is a new AFLAC tower (I am assuming that AFLAC -- unlike Synovus/TSYS -- is "safe" from being relocated). WC Bradley does monopolize DT -- but in a good way. They only do quality projects. The property they own between the Eagle& Phenix and the 13th St bridge has been cleared and I assume that they will use it for a multi-purpose (hopefully highrise) project. A combination condo/hotel/retail. But can be sure that that wont get underway until market forces dictate -- as WC Bradley always does its due diligence. Which is good, since a major flop DT would scare aware other developers for a generation. The "key" in my opinion is the whitewater project (and the river not drying up completely). Once that comes on line, I think that there will be renewed interest in DT and providing the amenities for the visitors that that will draw.
Use this thread to discuss development announcements for downtown C/PC.
#3
Posted 05 December 2007 - 05:18 PM
Re: brand retailers DT. Even Auburn, AL has a Gap downtown! just because brands come in doesn't mean control over quality is lost. I just think if a brand that's not in the mall came to DT, it might attract more folks who now don't even consider going downtown. I know I might go more. For one thing, the brands have serious advertising budgets to draw attention. Many town centers blend them both well, even in the old-and-new-again pud town center developments do that on purpose.
#4
Posted 05 December 2007 - 07:27 PM
aboutmetro, on Dec 5 2007, 06:18 PM, said:
Re: brand retailers DT. Even Auburn, AL has a Gap downtown! just because brands come in doesn't mean control over quality is lost. I just think if a brand that's not in the mall came to DT, it might attract more folks who now don't even consider going downtown. I know I might go more. For one thing, the brands have serious advertising budgets to draw attention. Many town centers blend them both well, even in the old-and-new-again pud town center developments do that on purpose.
Gap in DT Auburn makes sense -- big college population. If CSU presence in DT were comparable, a Gap in DT here would also make sense. Dont think there would be fierce opposition to a Gap or comparable brand store -- just a preference for a mom-and-pop to provide that element of retail. the thinking is that brand names are more bottomline/this quarter oriented and will cut and run (and ruin rep of DT) more quickly than mom-andpop who will be more committed to longterm success.
#5
Posted 06 December 2007 - 12:56 PM
gah, on Dec 5 2007, 08:27 PM, said:
That's simply not factual. There may be arguments for excluding chains from DT, but economic success isn't one of them. You can review reseach papers at ICSC on the subject if you have a login. Or you can review this summary from the U. or Wisconsin. Except for a few chairns which currently have financial troubles and aren't expanding anyway (like Kirklands), big retailers do in fact have more staying power than mom-n-pops. These guys are usually paycheck to paycheck, at least the ones in Columbus, and any slight downturn (like a streetscape makeover) forces them out of business. Gap was just an example. Moe's and Kinkos were both discouraged from going downtown. Who knows how many others? Many retailers expect a period of losses and have the wherewithall to absorb it. If a chain retailer did cut and run, it would say more about the viability of DT Columbus as a retail center, than the viability or integrity of the retailer. How many years did Walgreens and Even CVS stick it out down there with lower than average returns? Maybe not big box, but boutique and other chain retailers are desirable. This discussion is probably moot, though, since the current housing downturn has finally crept into the commercial sector. Otherwise, the ability of a downtown to attract chain retailers signals the economic success and viability of a downtown.
#6
Posted 06 December 2007 - 01:06 PM
aboutmetro, on Dec 6 2007, 01:56 PM, said:
#7
Posted 23 April 2008 - 08:11 AM
#8
Posted 23 April 2008 - 09:13 AM
mitchella81, on Apr 23 2008, 09:11 AM, said:
#9
Posted 28 April 2008 - 07:28 AM
ATLman1, on Apr 23 2008, 10:13 AM, said:
#10
Posted 05 May 2008 - 06:31 AM
Construction crews began working last month on the site of a new downtown YMCA building to replace the marble and brick that have served as a center for fitness in the town for 105 years.
The new place, being built at 14th Street and Broadway, will look like a modern marvel of brick, steel and mirrored windows. It'll offer 52,000 square feet of space for gyms, a swimming pool and exercise rooms -- about 37 percent more space than the current home, on 11th Street.
But the most appreciated space increase likely will be outside the new building. Construction of the new John P. Thayer YMCA, named for a man who's served on the YMCA board for nearly 40 years, is expected to cost between $10 million and $11 million.
Among the new place's amenities:
• Two racquetball courts.
• A rock climbing wall.
• A large space for fitness classes as well as several smaller exercise studios.
• A 25-yard, four-lane swimming pool.
It should open its doors in summer of 2009.
Edited by ATLman1, 05 May 2008 - 06:31 AM.
#11
Posted 29 May 2008 - 08:23 AM
If nothing else, the parking scheme makes more sense. In the old new site plan, the parking deck wasn't convenient to the school admin building. And there wasn't customer friendly parking adjacent to the 'Citizens' Service Center', as I recall. But also, the vision has a hotel, which makes alot of sense with a Natatorium to attract tournaments. Also, it has a vertical residential condo or coop tower! Some developments are even combining these two things - hotels & condos - but this doesn't seem to do that. There's also plenty retail strip and still plenty of greenspace. One of the towns around Atlanta even bought a retail area similar to Main Street Village and turned that into the citizens service center and rented space to retail and restaurants. Eye candy below if I did the attachment right...
#12
Posted 29 May 2008 - 10:19 AM
aboutmetro, on May 29 2008, 10:23 AM, said:
If nothing else, the parking scheme makes more sense. In the old new site plan, the parking deck wasn't convenient to the school admin building. And there wasn't customer friendly parking adjacent to the 'Citizens' Service Center', as I recall. But also, the vision has a hotel, which makes alot of sense with a Natatorium to attract tournaments. Also, it has a vertical residential condo or coop tower! Some developments are even combining these two things - hotels & condos - but this doesn't seem to do that. There's also plenty retail strip and still plenty of greenspace. One of the towns around Atlanta even bought a retail area similar to Main Street Village and turned that into the citizens service center and rented space to retail and restaurants. Eye candy below if I did the attachment right...
#13
Posted 07 October 2008 - 06:28 PM

#14
Posted 19 October 2008 - 05:19 AM
#15
Posted 19 October 2008 - 05:35 AM
aboutmetro, on Oct 7 2008, 06:28 PM, said:


#16
Posted 25 February 2009 - 07:33 AM
Edited by aboutmetro, 25 February 2009 - 07:43 AM.
#17
Posted 25 February 2009 - 12:46 PM
aboutmetro, on Feb 25 2009, 08:33 AM, said:
#18
Posted 25 February 2009 - 01:51 PM
kendal 8, on Feb 25 2009, 01:46 PM, said:
This is a policy discussion with a renowned expert in urban planning. If you'd want to suggest how specific types of businesses - particularly high density residential, as you suggest with mid-rise condos - work or don't work in a new urbanism planning model, and especially in a walkable communities policy discussion, then that would probably be welcome, assuming there's a questions and answer portion. And too, keeping in mind that this is an Uptown organization, though Mr. Leinberger also speaks to suburban walkable development. But this isn't really the venue to suggest specific restaurants or hotels.
#19
Posted 05 March 2009 - 02:03 PM
aboutmetro, on Feb 25 2009, 02:51 PM, said:
The discussion was excellent. There was a pre-luncheon Q&A that was very informative. Basically - use the proposed trolley for light rail.
#20
Posted 29 March 2009 - 07:18 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













