gibson, on Jan 11 2008, 07:30 PM, said:
The landscaping and architectural vernacular should be consistent with north florida. The hotel on the corner fails miserably. The project needs more brick and wood and less stucco.
As an investor, why would I do anything until the City of Tallahassee puts in the infrastructure?
Back to the architecture, N. Florida is different from S Florida and our architecture should reflect that. What works in Palm Beach, does not work in Tallahassee, and what works here does not work there.
Gibson- can you be a little more specific in terms of what additional infrastructure you are referring to?
With respect to the points you made about the architecture, I agree that the look of the hotel is not exactly what I had in mind either, but it was needed and fills a nice niche. I actually like the look of the proposed buildings at 650. Can you give some examples of what you would like to see/changes that you would like to see made to the current proposal, b/c whenever someone starts talking about N.Florida architecture, I still don't get a clear picture. Stucco doesn't get me excited either, but I really don't like brick and wood for this area- I'm not necessarily concerned with regional architectural identity (which I think would be "forced" on Gaines anyways, i.e., it doesn't already have historical builidings to imitate, and it isn't Seaside with an existing overall scheme), so much as I am that it looks like a real, modern, downtown, metropolitan area like the others we discuss so often on this board. Personally, I'd like to see a continuation of the repeating elements and styles that we've already seen in All Saints and the proposed Coca-Cola factory rehab, etc.