Who is going to buy all the Condos, (Part II)
#1
Posted 31 January 2008 - 07:56 AM
What other projects could be canned as well?
#2
Posted 31 January 2008 - 08:08 AM
Flippers will get creamed here, just like in Miami and Las Vegas, and prices will fall until rents will support the financing.
Edited by MZT, 31 January 2008 - 08:08 AM.
#3
Posted 31 January 2008 - 08:12 AM
I think a lot of this has to do with financing difficulties rather than demand. From best I could tell on 300, they pre-sold about 50%, which would have been good enough to start building if this was 1-2 years ago.
As I've said in other threads, I see TWELVE getting pushed back by 6months-1year, and the redevelopment of 222 S. Church being pushed back several years.
Other that these, everything else that has begun pre-selss has broken ground I believe....oh yeah, except Encore, which I think will happen, due to the small number of units...
All in all, I don't think we will see a drop in prices.....people who might have been planning to buy at 300 S. Tryon will now likely consider The Vue, or possibly 210 Trade. Buyers holding out for TWELVE will likely just purchase at Catalyst.
Assuming we don't start losing jobs again, I think we will see demand begin to exceed supply at some point in the next 2-4 years, and developers will be scrambling.
#4
Posted 31 January 2008 - 08:14 AM
MZT, on Jan 31 2008, 09:08 AM, said:
Flippers will get creamed here, just like in Miami and Las Vegas, and prices will fall until rents will support the financing.
At least some of the condos are being cancelled before they're even built. That'll help the demand for the units already built. I'm running into people looking at units at The Trademark who came to town under the impression The Vue was already built, for example.
#5
Posted 31 January 2008 - 08:32 AM
#6
Posted 31 January 2008 - 10:19 AM
This will turn around at some unknown point and projects will either be revived, changed or shelved, but markets always take care of themselves.
I do agree that the flippers who bought in a strong market are going to hurt the most from this. Good side, the rental market is great...switch from trying to make the quick dollar with a flip and take the longer road with a tenant!
It can't be all bad for the projects that are going up, especially Catalyst, to have some of their competition bow out.
Edited by Charlotte_native, 31 January 2008 - 10:20 AM.
#7
Posted 31 January 2008 - 10:40 AM
Will the delay of projects like 300 S. Tryon cause those that already reserved units to flee to other buildings that are built or are already under construction, thus pushing 300 back further due to a lack of sales?
#8
Posted 31 January 2008 - 10:53 AM
Raintree21, on Jan 31 2008, 11:40 AM, said:
#9
Posted 31 January 2008 - 12:09 PM
#10
Posted 31 January 2008 - 01:24 PM
Whether people want luxury condos in downtown isn't really the issue it is their ability to buy anything anywhere, the luxury units downtown or the more abundant normal units downtown are both slow so it doesn't appear to be picking on one part of the market or another. Right now peoples ability to buy and their fears over the economy are more of a driving factor than whether something is luxury or not. I would argue that the desire to own ones home is still there, just not the buying power nor the confidence that now is the right time to make a big move on anything.
As I've always believed, though, down cycles are part of the overall natural cycles and are as necessary as the up times.
I do know people buying right now and they are getting great deals -- If one has the ability and the confidence, now is probably the best time to get the best deal from the past couple of years and maybe through the next couple.
monsoon, on Jan 31 2008, 10:53 AM, said:
#11
Posted 31 January 2008 - 04:02 PM
monsoon, on Jan 31 2008, 11:53 AM, said:
#12
Posted 31 January 2008 - 04:55 PM
#13
Posted 31 January 2008 - 09:54 PM
#14
Posted 01 February 2008 - 07:45 AM
#15
Posted 01 February 2008 - 08:24 AM
RiverwoodCLT, on Feb 1 2008, 08:45 AM, said:
Out of curiousity, I drove by there yesterday. They had Pine blocked off. It appeared they were doing some kind of utility work on that side of the Vue site. There were also numerous workers in the hole that's been dug. I haven't seen much activity there lately either, but it appears they are still moving forward
#16
Posted 01 February 2008 - 08:40 AM
RiverwoodCLT, on Feb 1 2008, 08:45 AM, said:
dbull75, on Feb 1 2008, 09:24 AM, said:
I refer to my post about a week ago or so in the Vue topic noting that virtually nothing has been done. There were reports of pile driving but I've yet to see it or the equipment for it (although I haven't been there in a few days). There was very little heavy machinery there (only a small bulldozer and a dismantled crane w/ treads) last I saw. Could this be the next loss? Seems like this is too huge of a project to cut but the delays have been very noticeable. Having another vacant hole in the ground would be horrible (reminds me of DeeDee's hole in Glen Eagles).
#17
Posted 01 February 2008 - 09:22 AM
I say give it a year and see where we are at, and many of these projects (not all) could be resurrected. Lets hope so anyway.
#18
Posted 01 February 2008 - 10:11 AM
RiverwoodCLT, on Feb 1 2008, 07:45 AM, said:
#19
Posted 01 February 2008 - 01:33 PM
#20
Posted 05 February 2008 - 06:51 AM
Raintree21, on Feb 1 2008, 09:40 AM, said:
I don't know - I walk by 1-2 times every day, and I am seeing activity there daily. I know it appears slow going right now, but they seem to be moving along.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













