Charlotte Gateway Station and Railroad Improvements
#121
Posted 13 March 2011 - 12:57 PM
The applications are due April 4th which also gives NCDOT, USDOT, and Norfolk Southern some time to sort out their differences. If the issue with NS isn't solved by then, though, I doubt if NCDOT will be awarded anything at all.
#122
Posted 13 March 2011 - 11:15 PM
nonillogical, on 13 March 2011 - 10:11 AM, said:
Well I can tolerate waiting a bit. I just hate when we get these projects, especially infrastrucutre projects that seem to be more talk. I've been trying to read more on SEHSR and it seems so far there have been prelimanary and environmental studies. Is the Gateway Station one of the several things holding it up?
#123
Posted 09 May 2011 - 08:36 AM
The requests for Gateway station included:
Quote
$146.5 million (I have a hard time seeing any other source of cash for this project given its magnitude)
Quote
$38.5 million (while the city / state might be able to find this money in a friendlier political environment I wonder if construction would be pointless in the absence of the track improvements listed above)
The 36th street grade separation (for NCRR, SEHSR and CATS blue line extension) was also unfunded
Given that Gateway station is unlikely to begin moving for several more years I wonder if we should consider a new, temporary inter-city rail station on the NCRR at either Sugar Creek or 36th street which would smoothly interface with the blue line extension. This would have the virtue of providing better connections to downtown than the current station (and would also have better parking!).
#124
Posted 09 May 2011 - 11:10 AM
Even after the train station ultimately moved to Gateway, a bridge could be an amenity to help re-develop North Tryon in providing access to the BLE.
#125
Posted 09 May 2011 - 11:20 AM
southslider, on 09 May 2011 - 11:10 AM, said:
Even after the train station ultimately moved to Gateway, a bridge could be an amenity to help re-develop North Tryon in providing access to the BLE.
^ Much better idea than mine!
#126
Posted 10 May 2011 - 08:03 AM
#127
Posted 10 June 2011 - 01:54 PM
Quote
Quote
http://www.bizjourna...du&ana=e_du_pub
I am confused about how important the $200+ million for bridge repairs requested as part of the Florida HSR cash reallocation on the NCRR was to this project.
Edited by kermit, 10 June 2011 - 09:13 PM.
#128
Posted 10 June 2011 - 08:59 PM
kermit, on 10 June 2011 - 01:54 PM, said:
You misquoted the article.
Quote
#130
Posted 16 January 2012 - 07:10 PM
#131
Posted 16 January 2012 - 08:18 PM
It's too bad the station is gone, but IMO this wasn't a completely pointless loss of an architectural gem, eg. for the purpose of building a parking lot. Elevating the railroad was a pretty essential transportation project. It enabled Southern to maintain or increase operations without choking off traffic in the growing city. It also left mostly open the line that later became the Charlotte Trolley, and later still became the Blue Line (though I doubt there was any such consideration at the time.)
#132
Posted 16 January 2012 - 10:21 PM
Edited by ajfunder, 16 January 2012 - 10:24 PM.
#133
Posted 17 January 2012 - 08:53 PM
ajfunder, on 16 January 2012 - 10:21 PM, said:
I think the spur in question only went as far as the Observer building. No tracks, other than streetcar, ever crossed Tryon in the uptown area.
orulz, on 16 January 2012 - 08:18 PM, said:
It's too bad the station is gone, but IMO this wasn't a completely pointless loss of an architectural gem, eg. for the purpose of building a parking lot. Elevating the railroad was a pretty essential transportation project. It enabled Southern to maintain or increase operations without choking off traffic in the growing city. It also left mostly open the line that later became the Charlotte Trolley, and later still became the Blue Line (though I doubt there was any such consideration at the time.)
The new station on North Tryon was the modern/minimalist style that Charlotte glommed onto in the mid to late 60s, and it was compatible with the suburban lifestyle that most people wanted to have. It's not an excuse for tearing down the old ones, just an explanation.
It could be worse though... they could have just closed all of the streets through uptown like they are doing all across the state.
#134
Posted 17 January 2012 - 10:07 PM
Edited by ajfunder, 17 January 2012 - 10:15 PM.
#135
Posted 17 January 2012 - 10:46 PM
#136
#137
Posted 10 February 2012 - 07:42 AM
Not much new news but it is good to hear that there is some momemtum now on the land side of this project. I was on the Piedmont yesterday and was (as usual) overwhelmed by the crappiness of our current station (particularly in comparison to great stations in Durham, Burlington Greensboro and even Kannapolis)
http://www.bizjourna...n-in-works.html
#138
Posted 28 March 2012 - 08:43 AM
tozmervo, on 17 January 2012 - 10:46 PM, said:
Same here. Can someone verify that there was what looks to be a Speedway at Sugar Creek and N Tryon in the 1960 aerial. The Asian Mall is currently at the location I am speaking of. Just curious.
#139
Posted 28 March 2012 - 12:05 PM
#140
Posted 28 March 2012 - 01:10 PM
Edited by kermit, 28 March 2012 - 01:12 PM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













