Jump to content


- - - - -

Greenfire's revitalization plan for Downtown Durham


  • Please log in to reply
35 replies to this topic

#1 orulz

orulz

    Town

  • Moderators
  • 3,518 posts
  • Location:Raleigh, NC

Posted 16 February 2008 - 10:48 AM

Finally we get some concrete details on Greenfire's plan for a public/private partnership to revitalize downtown Durham.

At this point, four parcels (three of them city-owned) are being proposed for development:
  • Parking Deck at Chapel Hill/Magnum - I'm pretty sure this is the parking deck that was recently identified as having structural issues. A new (larger?) parking deck will built, and wrapped with retail and with residential units on top.
  • NE Corner Corcoran & Ramsuer Lot - Ground floor retail + residential
  • NE Corner Parrish & Church Lot - Ground floor retail + residential
  • Woolworth's lot, Corcoran between Main & Parrish - This lot across from the SunTrust tower (which will be converted to a boutique hotel) will be the home of a 18-20 story office tower.

Click here for a google map of these properties.

The developers are asking for a $12 million incentives package from the city. The article doesn't go into much detail as to what sort of incentives we're talking about, although Endangered Durham mentions that a Synthetic TIF is envisioned for at least part of it. What's the other part? Could the city simply give the land to the developer as a part of the incentives? I wonder what the value of these properties is; must be pretty significant.

This is great news for Durham, hopefully it moves forward in spite of the recent economic downturn.

 

#2 JDC

JDC

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,044 posts
  • Location:Greater Boston

Posted 18 February 2008 - 11:11 AM

Greenfire seems to have some really great plans. I haven't heard yet about what they plan to do with the recently-acquired South Bank building though.

I'm also a little concerned that a couple of the new proposed buildings might tower over the Hill (CCB/SunTrust) building. I've always thought that structure should be the "Empire State Building" of Durham's skyline. After all, they were designed by the same architects.

Kevin at Bull City Rising has some pretty comprehensive info on Greenfire's plans at his blog: www.bullcityrising.com

#3 raleightransplant

raleightransplant

    Whistle-Stop

  • Members+
  • PipPipPip
  • 258 posts

Posted 18 February 2008 - 12:10 PM

Great plans.  I see no downside to this.  Durham needs somebody to come in and completely shake things up.  I particularly love the Chapel Hill St./Mangum parking deck wrapped w/ retail.  That area near Rue Cler and Dos Perros has real potential.

#4 ChiefJoJo

ChiefJoJo

    City

  • Moderators
  • 4,069 posts

Posted 18 February 2008 - 12:13 PM

This definitely deserves it's own thread (done).  Thanks to BCR for his detailed coverage of this announcement.  Here's the link for discussion of the Hill Bldg conversion to a boutique hotel.

Details of the Greenfire announcement:
  • $284M investment
  • 250k sf office space
  • 430 residential units
  • 150 hotel rooms
  • 1,700 parking spaces
  • 70k sf of retail
Posted Image
Posted Image

#5 ncwebguy

ncwebguy

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,883 posts
  • Location:Downtown Raleigh. NC

Posted 18 February 2008 - 02:17 PM

The Corcoran/Ramseur lot is the most important "link" to connect the American Tobacco/DBAP/Performin Arts hall area (vying with the west side for most activity as of right now) with inside the loop.  The current pedestrian unfriendly zone comprised of Pettigrew, the tracks, the Ramseur part of the loop, and the sea of surface parking and decks will finally be "broken through".  Yet other than Blackwell/Corcoran and Mangum, the next way to get across the tracks is West Chapel Hill street to the west and Roxboro to the east.

It would be nice to see stronger connection between "in the Loop" and the four surrounding areas:
- AT/DBAP/Arts section -- none now, some with this project.  Maybe this sparks more construction along Ramseur.
- West Side - West Village, Brightleaf, etc. - later phases of West Village are helping build a connection, but it still seems like a tight squeeze even with the L&M's overstreet enclosed bridge torn down.
- Central Park/DAP area -- Foster and Rigsbee are showing signs of life,  plenty of surface parking to redevlop.
- east side -- connections via East Main, Liberty and Holloway have a lot of potential via surface parking.

All four districts (east side seems to be igored by downtown durham, nowhere near the same level of activity as ITL and the other three areas) could come into their own, and there might not need to be one "united" downtown Durham.

Greenfire's plan is just the first step to improving Durham.  If it is the only plan, it will be difficult to succeed, though there are enough pieces to work if nothing else happens.  If the plan comes to full fruition, it won't be the only thing happeing and several other pieces to the puzzle will start to fall in place.

#6 DPK

DPK

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 622 posts
  • Location:Raleigh

Posted 18 February 2008 - 08:21 PM

Hopefully the city goes along with this, as I really think it will change a lot of peoples perceptions on downtown Durham.  Everyone I talk to (and even myself frankly) think that downtown Durham is kind of sketchy.

#7 ChiefJoJo

ChiefJoJo

    City

  • Moderators
  • 4,069 posts

Posted 18 February 2008 - 09:00 PM

WRAL has a story on the project.

#8 RaleighRob

RaleighRob

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,095 posts
  • Location:Capital District, downtown Raleigh, NC

Posted 19 February 2008 - 08:21 AM

One of the Greenfire guys, Mike Lemanski, went to NCSU back in the day...not to mention, I believe a Durham native.   I was a freshman when he was a senior, so I didn't know him really, but some of my friends who knew him better always talked highly of him.   Motivated, smart, etc.  He was big in the environmental club on campus so that probably explains the big push for these buildings to have so many enviro elements to them.  
And to think even though the company's been around barely 5 years, they could really could do wonders for downtown Durham.   :thumbsup:

#9 ChiefJoJo

ChiefJoJo

    City

  • Moderators
  • 4,069 posts

Posted 19 February 2008 - 09:59 AM

One interesting aspect of this, is the fact that Greenfire--in addition to acquiring lots of buildings and parcels in downtown--is making it's pitch for city-owned property outside of the realm of a publicly advertised RPF process, a la sites 1 & 4 in Raleigh.  The whole plan has been kept secret until now and I'm guessing there are some who would say it's unfair for the city to 'conspire' with Greenfire :D  on these publically-owned parcels.  It's almost like the city staff has picked them as the master developer for downtown proper (inside the loop).  That is the dissenting argument.

I think a stronger argument is you have a motivated local developer who is moving forward towards revitalization where few--if any others--have gone before in the last 30 years.  The city council will get questions about fairness, I'm sure, but with downtown's revitalization so close, I'd hate to see it slip away on a technicality.  I would guess Mayor Bell will push this toward approval.

#10 Jones133

Jones133

    Town

  • Members+
  • 2,731 posts
  • Location:Downtown Raleigh NC

Posted 19 February 2008 - 10:34 AM

They must have a very convincing business plan backed by alot of investors willing to wait on their return because I don't see where Greenfire is pulling in much cash in the form of lease payments and condo sales. Empire, has done a nice step by step, buy a building, get a tenant, buy next building, get more tenants that seems solid....I am worried a bit by all the talk talk talk for several years now with very little actual dirt being turned...I know the plan was to spring it all at once, but again, Empire has shown how nicely (and safely) the step-wise approach works....come on now, Rue Cler needs some company guys....

#11 pack-man

pack-man

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 550 posts
  • Location:Raleigh, NC

Posted 19 February 2008 - 11:42 AM

good for durham.  i hope this plan gets the go-ahead nod.

#12 raleightransplant

raleightransplant

    Whistle-Stop

  • Members+
  • PipPipPip
  • 258 posts

Posted 19 February 2008 - 11:42 AM

While I agree that there is something to be said for the RFP process and fairness, we also need to consider time and situation.  Durham, despite the recent developments of ATHD and WVillage, remains largely dead (this in a part of one of America's fastest growing regions).  Durham's just asking to become a really cool city, but buy in from developers is a little slow.  I fear that without a large-scale movement like this, it's going to take forever to get that town kick-started.  I'm liking the direction of city with regard to the restaurants emerging and the DPAC, but I think they need something of the magnitude of American Tobacco right in the heart of downtown.  At this point in time, I think Greenfire is showing the capability and will to make something great happen downtown.  It's a risk, but one worth taking IMO.  Since this plan would be implemented over the course of years, I see it being something worth approving.

#13 ncwebguy

ncwebguy

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,883 posts
  • Location:Downtown Raleigh. NC

Posted 20 February 2008 - 05:27 PM

At NC State, Mike Lemanski was a writer when I was there.  He did have a mostly single-track focus on environmental stories, but was a good writer.  I know he was an enginering major, and I still don't know how he got into real estate, but more power to him.  I met Carl Webb at a real estate devlopment seminar class at UNC a year or so ago and he seemed to be interested making the numbers but also producing a product the community wants and will buy into.

I think city-owned land should go through the normal request for proposals process, but the way their plans for the city-owned land fits into their bigger vision/puzzle would be bigger/better than other proposals that would only develop the city's parcels.

#14 ChiefJoJo

ChiefJoJo

    City

  • Moderators
  • 4,069 posts

Posted 22 February 2008 - 11:57 AM

The council asked Greenfire some tough questions at a work session yesterday.  Specifically, they are getting to what some of you have said here: do they have the financial backing to see this through amidst a potentially difficult economy?

#15 Tayfromcarolina

Tayfromcarolina

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 619 posts

Posted 25 February 2008 - 12:05 PM

looks like a really nice project. Just when you think all is quiet. I especially like the tower part. The skylines are definitely changing around the triangle.

#16 ChiefJoJo

ChiefJoJo

    City

  • Moderators
  • 4,069 posts

Posted 29 February 2008 - 11:59 AM

Durham held a public forum on the Greenfire project, and the consensus seemed to be that many want the process to be deliberate, so the city can weight its options.  Greenfire countered that they are ready and willing to get moving ASAP.  I suppose they are calculating that the market will be there for the project once each phase is built out, and I'm sure they will taylor the phasing to the most immediately viable building project.

#17 ChiefJoJo

ChiefJoJo

    City

  • Moderators
  • 4,069 posts

Posted 04 March 2008 - 07:19 AM

The city council is putting the brakes on Greenfire's plans before they push forward on negotiations.  There are some complaints over lost parking, but most over whether the city should proceed without getting assurances of whether Greenfire has the financial backing to finish the job.

#18 RaleighRob

RaleighRob

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,095 posts
  • Location:Capital District, downtown Raleigh, NC

Posted 04 March 2008 - 07:33 AM

Well darn.  I hope that's only a minor speedbump and nothing more serious.  
At the least, I would think that this shouldn't slow down their work turning the Suntrust tower into that hotel.  (Since no outside construction would be necessary.)

#19 EvilDeveloper

EvilDeveloper

    Crossroads

  • New Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts

Posted 05 March 2008 - 10:43 PM

It is a testament to Durham's low expectations that absent from the discourse is the fact that no one involved with Greenfire has any significant real estate development experience.  

I am sure they have some well intentioned, articulate people.  But to stage such a complicated project calls for seasoned talent.
This group has revamped two small buildings and have yet to lease a single sf of retail.  

If this was a real city, the FRP process would be arduous to even let someone do a project of this scale on their own dime, even if they were not asking for a subsidy.

#20 DanRNC

DanRNC

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,927 posts
  • Location:Durham, NC

Posted 06 March 2008 - 10:33 AM

^The problem is that no one is rushing to construct anything in Durham-I sure as hell wouldn't.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users