Delta CEO Announces that Memphis will play major roll
#1
Posted 13 June 2008 - 08:27 AM
This is great news for Memphis and the state of Tennessee. This will help keep that tax revenue flowing in for our budget and help continue the immergence of Memphis as an Aerotropolis. This will also help to continue give Memphis the Dollars it needs to continue its city wide restoration. This is very important because Memphis is the front door to our state on I-40 and I-55.
#2
Posted 13 June 2008 - 04:02 PM
Given the increasingly dire state of the airline industry and the ongoing cutbacks due to high oil prices, there is absolutely no way that Memphis will survive as a hub for the new Delta. Maybe MEM will be a focus city, but never a hub. Cincinnati will meet a similar fate.
What is truly laughable is that the CEO is saying there may be flights from Memphis to Paris and Tokyo. Give us a break, we are not stupid. The only nonstops to those cities from Memphis will be on FedEx.
highriser, on Jun 13 2008, 09:27 AM, said:
This is great news for Memphis and the state of Tennessee. This will help keep that tax revenue flowing in for our budget and help continue the immergence of Memphis as an Aerotropolis. This will also help to continue give Memphis the Dollars it needs to continue its city wide restoration. This is very important because Memphis is the front door to our state on I-40 and I-55.
#3
Posted 13 June 2008 - 10:50 PM
BTW, I'm form BNA...I just like to see our state as a whole do well.
If you read the contents of the link I provided, I believe that the Delta CEO provided ample reason for leaving the Hub in Memphis. And yes, FedEx does play a major roll in this. Memphis int'l is well positioned, has enourmous runway space and isn't affected by weather too often. The Airport has also shown very good foresite with the new ATCT. Also, the renovation of the airport has been spectacular, and the new parking garage adds all the parking Memphis Int'l needs to remain a major hub. That Airport has proven to be very durable over the last 30 years as a major hub in Amerca's Air Operations, and as someone who is VERY close to airports and their functionality, I think I know what I'm talking about.
All roads don't end in Nashville dude, grow up...
#4
Posted 22 June 2008 - 08:29 PM
paribasomw, on Jun 13 2008, 06:02 PM, said:
Given the increasingly dire state of the airline industry and the ongoing cutbacks due to high oil prices, there is absolutely no way that Memphis will survive as a hub for the new Delta. Maybe MEM will be a focus city, but never a hub. Cincinnati will meet a similar fate.
What is truly laughable is that the CEO is saying there may be flights from Memphis to Paris and Tokyo. Give us a break, we are not stupid. The only nonstops to those cities from Memphis will be on FedEx.
#5
Posted 25 June 2008 - 10:04 AM
Bears, on Jun 22 2008, 09:29 PM, said:
Also, high fuel prices make it expensive to land in Atlanta because planes are frequently kept on holding patterns because of traffic. That wastes an enormous amount of fuel.
#6
Posted 25 June 2008 - 02:20 PM
highriser, on Jun 13 2008, 11:50 PM, said:
BTW, I'm form BNA...I just like to see our state as a whole do well.
If you read the contents of the link I provided, I believe that the Delta CEO provided ample reason for leaving the Hub in Memphis. And yes, FedEx does play a major roll in this. Memphis int'l is well positioned, has enourmous runway space and isn't affected by weather too often. The Airport has also shown very good foresite with the new ATCT. Also, the renovation of the airport has been spectacular, and the new parking garage adds all the parking Memphis Int'l needs to remain a major hub. That Airport has proven to be very durable over the last 30 years as a major hub in Amerca's Air Operations, and as someone who is VERY close to airports and their functionality, I think I know what I'm talking about.
All roads don't end in Nashville dude, grow up...
Bravo! I totally agree!
Edited by Memphis77, 25 June 2008 - 02:22 PM.
#7
Posted 25 June 2008 - 05:25 PM
shekelmeister, on Jun 25 2008, 12:52 PM, said:
any airline consolidation will actually have a huge impact on
the Memphis airport traffic..but Northwest could not do any
worse..Flights to Memphis are stupid expensive when compared
to Nashville..At least Nashville has Southwest
#8
Posted 26 June 2008 - 10:20 AM
Nashville & Middle TN has a significantly larger population base than Memphis, even including neighboring AR & MS.
The Middle TN region is the fastest-growing in the state. It's population growth rate has exceeded West TN for more than 18 years.
Nashville has a much larger convention and tourism business than Memphis. There are already far more hotel rooms in Nashville to support tourism, convention and business visitors, including Gaylord Opryland which is one of the largest hotels in the US. There is so much activity that Nashville can support two major convention centers -- downtown and at Opryland. In fact, work will start work next year on another downtown convention center and hotel to replace the one built in the 1990s which is already too small.
Nashville/Middle TN has a larger corporate business base than Memphis/AR & MS.
In terms of airline passenger traffic, the single most important measure is the number of origination and destination passengers. Nashville (BNA) has a significantly larger number of origination & destination (O&D) airline passengers than Memphis (MEM).
Thankfully, BNA is very fortunate to have Southwest Airlines which means lots of nonstop service and competitive fares.
Memphis77, on Jun 25 2008, 03:20 PM, said:
#9
Posted 26 June 2008 - 02:17 PM
paribasomw, on Jun 26 2008, 11:20 AM, said:
Nashville & Middle TN has a significantly larger population base than Memphis, even including neighboring AR & MS.
The Middle TN region is the fastest-growing in the state. It's population growth rate has exceeded West TN for more than 18 years.
Nashville has a much larger convention and tourism business than Memphis. There are already far more hotel rooms in Nashville to support tourism, convention and business visitors, including Gaylord Opryland which is one of the largest hotels in the US. There is so much activity that Nashville can support two major convention centers -- downtown and at Opryland. In fact, work will start work next year on another downtown convention center and hotel to replace the one built in the 1990s which is already too small.
Nashville/Middle TN has a larger corporate business base than Memphis/AR & MS.
In terms of airline passenger traffic, the single most important measure is the number of origination and destination passengers. Nashville (BNA) has a significantly larger number of origination & destination (O&D) airline passengers than Memphis (MEM).
Thankfully, BNA is very fortunate to have Southwest Airlines which means lots of nonstop service and competitive fares.
The reason Middle TN has a larger population is due to the fact that there's more room to grow East and West whereas Memphis is limited to only the East. The tourism in Memphis is about to skyrocket with what billionaire Rober FX Sillerman and EPE are about to do with the Graceland area in Whitehaven. The followings are planned for the transformation:
-$500 million-$1 billion invested in redevelopment-privately and publicly funded
-Over 120 acres of land, both commercial and residential
-A new convention center
-A 600 plus room convention hotel
-2 more hotels (including Elvis themed)
-An entertainment complex and amphitheater
-A 80,000 sf visitor center
-museum complex
-upscale retail and dining
-live entertainment
That's just Graceland's big plans over the next 5 years. And that alone will triple Memphis' struggling economy and tourism yearly. The Airport authority is calling the Graceland plan the biggest the city has ever seen as far as tourism and economical impact goes. This is much bigger than just an expansion for Elvis fans. It will be Memphis' Disney! As Graceland grows so will other tourist attractions around and nearby. If the resort projects in Southaven do ever get off the ground and MGM theme Park is completed, it will only benefit the Memphis area and economy even more. If that all happens, then Memphis/Southaven area will become the new hotbed for family tourist destinations in AMerica!
#10
Posted 30 June 2008 - 08:36 AM
paribasomw, on Jun 26 2008, 11:20 AM, said:
Nashville & Middle TN has a significantly larger population base than Memphis, even including neighboring AR & MS.
The Middle TN region is the fastest-growing in the state. It's population growth rate has exceeded West TN for more than 18 years.
Nashville has a much larger convention and tourism business than Memphis. There are already far more hotel rooms in Nashville to support tourism, convention and business visitors, including Gaylord Opryland which is one of the largest hotels in the US. There is so much activity that Nashville can support two major convention centers -- downtown and at Opryland. In fact, work will start work next year on another downtown convention center and hotel to replace the one built in the 1990s which is already too small.
Nashville/Middle TN has a larger corporate business base than Memphis/AR & MS.
In terms of airline passenger traffic, the single most important measure is the number of origination and destination passengers. Nashville (BNA) has a significantly larger number of origination & destination (O&D) airline passengers than Memphis (MEM).
Thankfully, BNA is very fortunate to have Southwest Airlines which means lots of nonstop service and competitive fares.
The single most important measure is profit. If Memphis is profitable for DL/NW as a hub then it will continue to be a hub. If it is not profitable then it will not continue. The actual population of the area will not be a huge factor in deciding this.
#11
Posted 30 June 2008 - 12:29 PM
THe aerotropolis concept is the future; if we can only not let this concept of hope slip from our grasp, we can indeed turn the corner significantly.. Just think of Dubai.
Go Memphis!!!
Edited by TchulahomaKid38118, 30 June 2008 - 12:43 PM.
#12
Posted 20 July 2008 - 06:18 AM
Part of Pinnacle's current agreement with NWA allows NWA to remove a certain amout of 50-seat CRJ200s and replace them with 76-seat CRJ900s (already being flown by Mesaba), so you'll probably be seeing the cramped 50-seaters going away over the next few years as their fuel cost per seat mile is greater than the CRJ900.
CA: http://www.commercia...concur-on-deal/
MBJ: http://memphis.bizjo...14/daily36.html
#13
Posted 04 November 2008 - 08:02 AM
http://www.tallahass...NGNEWS/81030025
#14
Posted 04 November 2008 - 11:52 AM
http://www.starkvill.../view/99604/60/
#15
Posted 06 November 2008 - 02:02 AM
Any Delta service would be provided by a subsidary of the new Delta no? Or does/will Delta serve this size airport/market?
#16
Posted 06 November 2008 - 08:46 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













