The Residences at Cameron Village
#61
Posted 12 November 2010 - 07:40 PM
#62
Posted 13 November 2010 - 11:17 AM
#63
Posted 03 February 2011 - 07:40 AM
#64
Posted 03 February 2011 - 09:19 AM
#65
Posted 03 February 2011 - 12:16 PM
Edited by RaleighRob, 03 February 2011 - 12:18 PM.
#66
Posted 10 February 2011 - 08:24 AM
Frankly though, I say, no thanks.
#67
Posted 11 February 2011 - 10:20 AM
#68
Posted 11 February 2011 - 12:02 PM
citiboi27610, on 11 February 2011 - 10:20 AM, said:
No idea. All I could find were the old ones:
http://www.raleighnc...n/SP-096-08.pdf
Emailed Sue Stock and she replied:
Quote
Sue
Edited by DPK, 11 February 2011 - 12:26 PM.
#69
Posted 11 February 2011 - 12:10 PM
http://www.raleighnc...ough-agenda.pdf
#70
Posted 26 February 2011 - 11:45 AM
orulz, on 03 February 2011 - 09:19 AM, said:
Two issues on the development side in play here are building materials and parking costs. Most of the recent urban apartments are stick-built on a concrete podium, which maxes out the allowable height by building code at (I think) 6 stories--1 concrete podium, often for retail, 5 floors wood framed, including Tucker St, Park & Market (N. Hills), Oberlin Court. If you want to build any higher than that, you have to go to concrete or steel throughout. Hue did all steel frame, but they were 7 stories: 1+6. Look at the price point for Hue and some of these other apartments and you are talking $1000/month for ~700 sf, and that's for a mediocre quality building, with poor sound proofing, low quality exterior materials and finishing, uninspiring architecture and such. Of course, as you build taller, builders can spread out the costs over a larger volume of product (# units), so you can economically justify a higher quality product. Then there's parking. Concrete and steel decks are very expensive (~$20k+/space), and although most modern zoning codes are now offering parking reductions for mixed use, we're still talking over a space per unit in most cases, so we're talking hundreds of deck spaces, not counting retail or office parking demand. That all adds up.
My sense is there's probably a break point at which you either do stick built housing at 6 stories (probably what Crescent is doing), or you have to go up a few notches with steel/concrete and do 9+ stories to recover the higher materials costs (what Crescent may have been planning initially) to be able to make the numbers work for the marketplace. Not unlike other eras, we'll probably end up with a bunch of 6-story stick-build urban apartments that are more or less uniform in their design sprinkled throughout the region.
#71
Posted 26 February 2011 - 08:33 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













