Esserman and Cicilline bad for Providence?
#1
Posted 04 July 2008 - 08:47 AM
What gives?
Jim
#2
Posted 04 July 2008 - 05:23 PM
#3
Posted 05 July 2008 - 09:31 AM
runawayjim, on Jul 4 2008, 07:23 PM, said:
What I was told was there were complaints from businesses and residents in the state house area that embers were landing on their buildings, the fire marshal decided the risk of fire was too high when launching them from there. There was a plan to launch them from a barge in the Providence River (outside the hurricane barrier) but no one in the city bothered to apply for the appropriate permits until early last week, and the Coast Guard laughed at them when they tried to apply Monday for Friday.
Lots of ball dropping happens in this city. Sometimes I feel like the state and city governments are run by a bunch of teenagers and they need their parents to come in and hold their hands.
A lot of other cities around the country cancelled their displays due to cost this year. Apparently there were several large fireworks factory explosions in China over the last year, and there is actually a worldwide shortage of fireworks due to that. The shortage is driving up the costs.
#4
Posted 05 July 2008 - 06:58 PM
Cotuit, on Jul 5 2008, 11:31 AM, said:
i think it's funny that they complained after having fireworks shot from there several times a year for the past how many years?
i think they should shoot them off from the river/bay and have people watch from india point park. that seems like it'd be a great way to get people into that park, though i did love the echoing back and forth off the buildings when they did them downtown.
#5
Posted 06 July 2008 - 07:18 AM
#6
Posted 06 July 2008 - 11:15 AM
#7
Posted 06 July 2008 - 02:20 PM
AriPVD, on Jul 6 2008, 01:15 PM, said:
Jim
#8
Posted 06 July 2008 - 07:54 PM
Anyone else care to weigh in?
Edited by AriPVD, 06 July 2008 - 07:54 PM.
#9
Posted 06 July 2008 - 09:12 PM
#11
Posted 07 July 2008 - 06:01 AM
AriPVD, on Jul 6 2008, 09:54 PM, said:
Anyone else care to weigh in?
I think Col. Esserman has done a fantastic job here in Providence. His reputation preceeds him in the law enforcement community. He is well known for his success in curbing crime in Stamford, CT & Providence, RI. Also for his leadership while in command at the NY Transit Police. He in constantly being invited to national and international forums on policing issues effecting society. We were very lucky to get him to come here. His wife and children don't even live in Providence, but in NY. He travels there almost every weekend to visit them. He makes this sacrifice for us and our city, for which he serves. Oh my, I hope he's not using a city car.
As for the incident at TF Green, all has not been reported here. Here's the scoup, or as they say in England, here's the rub. The Col. was flying out to a conference and notified the Airport Police of who he was and that he'd be carrying a firearm and would like a little professional courtesy. In other words he prefered not to go through the usual airport screening procedures. The Col. arrived, was escorted through as requested with no problems, untill the Transportation Security Administration got wind of it. Then all hell broke loose. In my opinion the TSA and Homeland Security go way too far which is one reason why I no longer fly. I won't be treated like cattle or a thief. An investigation was called for, so I don't know what will happen. Probably and hopefully nothing. Such nonsense. This was an insult to the chief.
Now, on this immigration issue concerning the Col., I think he's right and I stand behind him on this issue. The PPD should not be concerned with rounding up illegals unless thay commit a crime. They should not be pounding on doors of local factories looking for illegals from South Americans and other places. It should be the job of the Immigration & Naturalization Service or ICE.
For the life of me I don't understand this thread.
Edited by Frankie811, 07 July 2008 - 06:12 AM.
#12
Posted 07 July 2008 - 06:50 AM
Frankie811, on Jul 7 2008, 08:01 AM, said:
I have no problem with police officers taking their cruisers home when they are on duty. However, in what job does someone get reimbursed for their travel to and from work? What good is it to have a police officer on the clock 30 minutes from Providence? That's wasteful. There is absolutely no need for that. Now, I don't know much about the situation, but I have never heard of a police officer, other than perhaps a detective, on the clock 24/7. And generally speaking, detectives don't drive regular cruisers.
While the officers may choose where to live, Esserman chooses to allow them to use city resources to bring them to and from work. If he's going to do that, perhaps they should require anyone working for the Providence Police Dept to live in the city so they aren't spending ungodly amounts of the city's money commuting.
#13
Posted 07 July 2008 - 07:53 AM
#14
Posted 07 July 2008 - 07:59 AM
Maybe the local FOP has some weight when they criticize Esserman.
Not to completely pile on Esserman, Cicilline has his coming to him. His dual with Don is making him look like a fool.
Jim
#15
Posted 07 July 2008 - 08:04 AM
#16
Posted 07 July 2008 - 01:03 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













