West End Summit revisited
#41
Posted 11 December 2008 - 09:36 PM
malls are bad enough, a downtown mall, even worse. i think they should cut their losses, let the cc fill it up with junk, and build some low rise (2 or 3 stories) structures there that front all the way up to the sidewalk. no parking in front, and consider it dense infill
#42
Posted 11 December 2008 - 11:30 PM
#43
Posted 12 December 2008 - 11:27 AM
#44
Posted 29 April 2009 - 01:09 PM
I think I saw a large catfish flip me off when I took this,,,

Yet the billboard remains.
#45
Posted 29 April 2009 - 07:58 PM
Lol that sign has been up so long that it's black and white from sun-fading.
#46
Posted 12 June 2009 - 12:04 PM
Delayed projects create eyesores, safety concerns
Palmer had this to say about WES:
Quote
Palmer, whose $310 million project has not violated any codes, said he is working to find financing and could bring in an outside investor.
"Nothing has really changed," he said of the development, where construction stopped more than a year ago.
#47
Posted 15 June 2009 - 11:05 AM
As much as I like to see this get built, I wish developers would focus on more affordable housing in the downtown area. As we see with the struggling condo market, the area is now flooded and doing poorly. We need to focus on "smaller" things we can do to improve the urban fabric. Such as small steps to improve transport options, improving the neighborhoods and areas with parks, accessible walking areas, biking areas, improve street scapes (yay riverfront development and boo transmission lines), a good mix of commercial store fronts and affordable living areas, connectivity between neighborhoods, improved schools, etc.
Edited by timmay143, 15 June 2009 - 11:11 AM.
#48
Posted 15 June 2009 - 04:28 PM
timmay143, on Jun 15 2009, 12:05 PM, said:
#49
Posted 15 June 2009 - 10:23 PM
dchunter, on Jun 15 2009, 05:28 PM, said:
Haha... don't send them our way. We have enough here as it is. Here in Atlanta they have these meters on the downtown sidewalks that have signs that say something like: "Do not encourage panhandlers, if you'd like to make a donation to help homelessness please donate your spare change here." They've put them in the worst areas for panhandling. The meters securely collect the change and then it's doled out to local shelters. I think it's a good idea for any city to have these "panhandler meters." Anyway, this is off topic...
#50
Posted 17 June 2009 - 02:19 PM
timmay143, on Jun 15 2009, 01:05 PM, said:
As much as I like to see this get built, I wish developers would focus on more affordable housing in the downtown area. As we see with the struggling condo market, the area is now flooded and doing poorly. We need to focus on "smaller" things we can do to improve the urban fabric. Such as small steps to improve transport options, improving the neighborhoods and areas with parks, accessible walking areas, biking areas, improve street scapes (yay riverfront development and boo transmission lines), a good mix of commercial store fronts and affordable living areas, connectivity between neighborhoods, improved schools, etc.
I hope you see how the bolded parts above will fix themselves without any help
#51
Posted 20 October 2010 - 05:02 PM

I borrowed the pic of it from Richard's blog site.. hope he doesnt mind!
#52
Posted 20 October 2010 - 07:46 PM
Its a shame this property has looked like this now for almost 4 years and its shameful the city has done nothing to make Mr. Palmer fill in the hole and make it look respectable. I thought they should turn this lot into satellite parking for Vanderbilt or Baptist Hospital and landscape it. A surface lot with landscaping would look so much better than this.
You could even arrange for the downtown circulator to pick people up from this lot for events downtown.
BR86
#53
Posted 20 October 2010 - 11:29 PM
MTSUBlueraider86, on 20 October 2010 - 07:46 PM, said:
Its a shame this property has looked like this now for almost 4 years and its shameful the city has done nothing to make Mr. Palmer fill in the hole and make it look respectable. I thought they should turn this lot into satellite parking for Vanderbilt or Baptist Hospital and landscape it. A surface lot with landscaping would look so much better than this.
You could even arrange for the downtown circulator to pick people up from this lot for events downtown.
BR86
Actually, I might disagree with the BR86 point that a surface lot with landscaping would look so much better than the big hole. I would say a surface lot would serve a function, but what would be essentially a used car lot would be as big an eyesore as a hole. In short, I detest visible surface parking lots -- with cars or without. I realize we need them, but ideally, they would all be concealed or discretely place.
WW/ESU
#54
Posted 03 November 2010 - 01:39 PM
#56
Posted 12 November 2010 - 12:59 PM
#57
Posted 12 November 2010 - 07:36 PM
#58
Posted 12 November 2010 - 10:27 PM
BR86
#59
Posted 12 December 2010 - 10:28 AM
#60
Posted 12 December 2010 - 10:37 AM
IMO this was a great article.
He was forthright in his opinions and stated the conditions under which construction would commence. He owns the land and has no reason to blow smoke unless it is to reassure the existing signers of a letter of intent.
Great news for this Christmas season...
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













