I don't get why some continue to call The Griswold as "on hold", when it is effectively dead. Things aren't going to get better for real estate for at least another two years, and are, in fact, to get worse. Just because the developer may still have the desire to develop a thing doesn't make a project 'on hold.' For all intents and purposes, the project (as we know it, and as it was proposed) is effectively dead. I don't get why people have a hard time saying that.
Just so you know, Wolv, this wasn't directly solely or even mostly at you, but towards this idea that projects that don't get off the ground in time, in Detroit, especially, have a more-likely-than-not chane of getting built. That just hasn't ever been the case in post-war Detroit.
Edited by Lmichigan, 05 October 2008 - 07:15 PM.