Providence's wish list
#1
Posted 01 February 2009 - 05:47 AM
#2
#3
Posted 02 February 2009 - 09:26 AM
I do like the 22M to fix up the Amtrak station & garage. That seems like quite a bit of money for a renovation (unless the building has bigger issues than any of us know about).
3M to expand RIPTA 56, 20, 99, 11 sounds good too.
Does anyone know the details of what the "downtown circulator" might be?
#5
Posted 02 February 2009 - 11:14 AM
mental757, on Feb 2 2009, 10:26 AM, said:
Thats actually just for the escalator.
mental757, on Feb 2 2009, 10:26 AM, said:
Could this be changing Empire and Weybosset to 2 way?
#6
Posted 02 February 2009 - 01:48 PM
Liamlunchtray, on Feb 2 2009, 10:14 AM, said:
I think the streetcar quote is just for the first line. It probably shouldn't say "system", but it does for some reason. Bear in mind, this wish list was put forward before the "governer" cut all aid to cities and towns, so there was probably more money from the city going to the streetcars before that.
Edited by Pseudo_Work, 02 February 2009 - 01:51 PM.
#7
Posted 02 February 2009 - 04:04 PM
mental757, on Feb 2 2009, 10:26 AM, said:
A building that young should not need renovation, deferred maintenance... so sad.
There are plans to expand parking capacity here, I assume that is part of the $22million.
There is a very tentative proposal to expand the station as a northern hub for RIPTA, the so-called Gaspee Station plan. I'm not sure how far those plans have progressed or if one could call the plans, "shovel ready."
Liamlunchtray, on Feb 2 2009, 12:14 PM, said:
Yes, I'm pretty sure "Downtown Circulator" includes two-way Weybosset and Empire as well as work at Emmett and LaSalle Squares and Fountain Street. Fountain is being put on a diet and realigned slightly. The road will be brought in so that it is no longer this big wide dragway, I think plans called for angled parking around the Fogarty Building area.
Pseudo_Work, on Feb 2 2009, 02:48 PM, said:
What I heard a long long time ago is that the city wants one line (literally, one track) connecting the train station, Brown, and the Hospitals. I think technically, it is just about feasible for that amount, but I can't imagine that includes overhead like train maintenance, drivers' salaries, a trolley barn...
#8
Posted 03 February 2009 - 08:33 AM
What is the most likely route that would connect Brown, the train station and the Hospitals?
#10
Posted 03 February 2009 - 12:12 PM
Quote
So this is interesting... They want to put the medical school in the parking garage complex? That's actually quite an interesting idea. Why not?
Brown (in theory) has 100 million to spend in part on the medical school, so maybe the two team up for a bang-for-your-buck project? That location would be close enough to the hospitals and the other Jewelry District Brown properties...
- Garris
Greater City Providence Urbanism Blog
http://www.gcpvd.org
#12
Posted 03 February 2009 - 09:35 PM
frymasterspeck, on Feb 3 2009, 01:17 PM, said:
The entire train station is a lesson in not planning for success. Imagine if more than one train an hour pulled through there, where would people wait. There's what, room for 30 to sit comfortably in the rotunda?
#13
Posted 03 February 2009 - 10:02 PM
Cotuit, on Feb 3 2009, 08:35 PM, said:
...Sit on the floor like people do in every other train station.
#14
Posted 04 February 2009 - 06:50 AM
Even a rudimentary streetcar system could do so much for a city like Providence. And fudge, if Newark can have a subway line ...
#15
Posted 04 February 2009 - 08:31 AM
#16
Posted 04 February 2009 - 12:27 PM
The NIMBY crowd on College Hill will never allow a light rail line to be built in that area. The first line built should go from downtown right down Broad St to RW Park. That area has a greater need for public transpotation and will offer the least resistance.
#17
Posted 04 February 2009 - 12:38 PM
Patrick Ward, on Feb 4 2009, 11:27 AM, said:
The NIMBY crowd on College Hill will never allow a light rail line to be built in that area. The first line built should go from downtown right down Broad St to RW Park. That area has a greater need for public transpotation and will offer the least resistance.
#18
Posted 04 February 2009 - 01:45 PM
Pseudo_Work, on Feb 4 2009, 01:38 PM, said:
I live on Health Ave in the Valley and represent no one. Not enough votes my way.
A small group of residents in Hingham MA held up construction on the MBTA Greenbush commuter rail line for over 10 years and added tens of millions of dollars to the project because they did not want a train running through Hingham center. Never underestimate the power of the NIMBY crowd.
#19
Posted 04 February 2009 - 03:59 PM
Patrick Ward, on Feb 4 2009, 01:27 PM, said:
I agree on both counts. A Broad Street/Elmwood Ave. line would serve a population of people who are already accustomed to using transit and would welcome improvements. And connecting Downcity to the Zoo would be a boon for tourism. Tourists don't want to take "bus 20" to the Zoo, but they'd be all over a trolley.
I'd swing it past the Zoo to Park Ave. in Cranston and make a park n' ride and bus hub there. Commuters from Cranston could bus to the trolley and zoom into the city.
Throw in some Transit Oriented Development along Elmwood Ave. while you're at it.
#20
Posted 04 February 2009 - 06:04 PM
Patrick Ward, on Feb 4 2009, 01:27 PM, said:
An excellent point.
Has anyone made the NIMBY crowd on College Hill aware of the fact that they live in the middle of a freaking city?
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













