Frankie811, on Feb 3 2009, 07:52 AM, said:
I thought that this project was going to be built in Cranston which is, as you said, centrally located. But I seem to remember something about a protest from a golf course owner whose land was adjacent to the proposed Cranston site. So with this project now being built in North Scituate, does this mean that the baracks located around the state won't be closed? And I disagree with you about the state not renovating an old building in the Howard complex for a headquarters. The whole purpose of building new is to provide the state police with a building able to provide them and support state of the art technologies. The original plan was to have a new headquarters in Cranston where all state police operations would work out of and report for duty, and the closing of the remaining baracks throughout the state.
1. The original Cranston plan was to be on the site of Mulligan's Island mini golf course, on Western side of complex near new traffic court, which sits on land leased from the state.
2. When the buy back of that lease was deemed to large it was moved to the eastern side of the complex. Again, Welcome Arnold Homeless shelter was torn down to accommodate this plan.
3. They can't install technology in an old building? Somebody please tell all of the Ivy League Universities that they can't do what the have been doing for decades now.
4. Aren't the troopers supposed to be on the Highway in their cars?