Jump to content


- - - - -

28-Floor Vista Apartment Tower


  • Please log in to reply
38 replies to this topic

#1 CorgiMatt

CorgiMatt

    Town

  • Members+
  • 2,934 posts
  • Location:Columbia, South Carolina

Posted 05 April 2010 - 02:11 PM

Two 28-story residential towers are planned for the Vista near the Greek Village.

http://www.columbiab...for-vista?rss=0

Here's the DDRC's agenda.

http://www.columbia....a_Mixed_Use.pdf

Edited by CorgiMatt, 05 April 2010 - 02:16 PM.


 

#2 citylife

citylife

    Town

  • Members+
  • 2,676 posts
  • Location:Greenville, SC

Posted 05 April 2010 - 04:43 PM

Posted Image I'm sorry but those highrises look like crap. Who designed it? Yuck. On top of that, who do they expect to move into these 600 apartments/condos when other similar developments Adesso and Aspyre  can't even rent or sell theirs? Posted Image This is a wishful thinking project and I put the chance of it getting built at less than 5%.

Edited by citylife, 05 April 2010 - 04:49 PM.


#3 burbman08

burbman08

    Crossroads

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 10 posts

Posted 05 April 2010 - 05:28 PM

View Postkrazeeboi, on 04 April 2010 - 10:41 PM, said:

USC still has to come up with private matching funds for the public dollars that have so far been invested in Innovista.

I wasn't quite sure where to post this and/or to create a new thread, but I saw this in the CO today.  This could be great news for one of those many parking lots : )

http://www.charlotte...s-22-story.html

The project wouldn't be affiliated with inovista, but would/could play a big role in its future.  Cant wait to see how this all plays out.

#4 CorgiMatt

CorgiMatt

    Town

  • Members+
  • 2,934 posts
  • Location:Columbia, South Carolina

Posted 05 April 2010 - 06:39 PM

View Postcitylife, on 05 April 2010 - 04:43 PM, said:

Posted Image I'm sorry but those highrises look like crap. Who designed it? Yuck. On top of that, who do they expect to move into these 600 apartments/condos when other similar developments Adesso and Aspyre  can't even rent or sell theirs? Posted Image This is a wishful thinking project and I put the chance of it getting built at less than 5%.
I guess we'll see.  At any rate, the renderings are preliminary and preliminary renderings are often all white.  With some color I think the architecture would come alive.

#5 CorgiMatt

CorgiMatt

    Town

  • Members+
  • 2,934 posts
  • Location:Columbia, South Carolina

Posted 05 April 2010 - 06:57 PM

As this article from The State explains, the development would just be more of what they've already been doing in the larger area.  

http://www.thestate....roposed-in.html

Edited by CorgiMatt, 05 April 2010 - 07:05 PM.


#6 emerging.me

emerging.me

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,225 posts
  • Location:Columbia, SC

Posted 05 April 2010 - 09:42 PM

View Postcitylife, on 05 April 2010 - 04:43 PM, said:

Posted Image I'm sorry but those highrises look like crap. Who designed it? Yuck. On top of that, who do they expect to move into these 600 apartments/condos when other similar developments Adesso and Aspyre  can't even rent or sell theirs? Posted Image This is a wishful thinking project and I put the chance of it getting built at less than 5%.

I agree 100%. I think the concept is horrendous. The design is bland as can be, but the big problem is that the scale is ENTIRELY freaking incongruous with the surrounding context. If this gets past the DDRC as is, I'll be completely disheartened.

Edited by emerging.me, 05 April 2010 - 09:45 PM.


#7 krazeeboi

krazeeboi

    Gigalopolis

  • Moderators
  • 16,468 posts
  • Location:metro Atlanta

Posted 05 April 2010 - 09:49 PM

A couple of things. First, either this developer is really ballsy or really oblivious. I suppose we'll see. But I have to agree with citylife in that other residential developments aren't exactly doing as expected right now, such as Adesso and Canalside. Not sure about Aspyre, but it caters mostly to students so that market is a built-in one, but even with this one catering to students too, it appears to be overly ambitious. Two 28-story towers? I mean really??? Secondly, the renderings aren't exactly detailed, so I'd hold judgment until they are released. Thirdly, I suppose the height restrictions in the Vista will just be thrown out the window if this project is approved. Fourthly, if (a big "if," IMO) this project goes up, it would be a really weird spot for the two second-tallest buildings in the city to be built and wouldn't be captured in typical skyline shots.

#8 CorgiMatt

CorgiMatt

    Town

  • Members+
  • 2,934 posts
  • Location:Columbia, South Carolina

Posted 06 April 2010 - 05:13 AM

Students have flooded onto Bluff and Shop roads where lots of apartments have been built, and those are doing well.  Why not bring the students back up to where they can walk to class?  I don't know if that part of the Vista has height restrictions.  The new director of Innovista says in The State that two developers are combining financing and that, while they haven't checked references yet, his gut feeling is they are for real because, while condo development and the general housing market has suffered throughout the nation, many developers have been able to get financing for apartments in college and university towns.  We'll see.  According to the attached article from Columbia Regional Business Report's website, the developer has been looking at the site for almost a year.

http://www.columbiab...for-vista?rss=0

Edited by CorgiMatt, 06 April 2010 - 05:19 AM.


#9 krazeeboi

krazeeboi

    Gigalopolis

  • Moderators
  • 16,468 posts
  • Location:metro Atlanta

Posted 06 April 2010 - 09:33 AM

View Postemerging.me, on 05 April 2010 - 09:42 PM, said:

I agree 100%. I think the concept is horrendous. The design is bland as can be, but the big problem is that the scale is ENTIRELY freaking incongruous with the surrounding context. If this gets past the DDRC as is, I'll be completely disheartened.
I don't think the design can be fully judged at this point since there are no details concerning exterior materials, etc., but I do agree with you that this development would definitely be out of place at this location. You've got the lowrise buildings in the vicinity, plus the Darla Moore School of Business to be built on an adjacent parcel, and right across from the Greek Village. If the project doesn't get scrapped entirely, the height needs to be drastically reduced.

#10 Spartan

Spartan

    Gigalopolis

  • Global Moderators
  • 17,009 posts
  • Location:Charlotte, NC

Posted 06 April 2010 - 12:36 PM

This is potentially massive enough to warrant its own thread :)

I'll have more to say later.

#11 growingup15

growingup15

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 482 posts
  • Location:Columbia,sc

Posted 06 April 2010 - 01:02 PM

i just seen that on FOX Charlotte. and i was like OMG. that towers looks great it will be huge in Columbia and the tallest in the city. this is what the city really needed. i need to update my city website now on this

#12 CorgiMatt

CorgiMatt

    Town

  • Members+
  • 2,934 posts
  • Location:Columbia, South Carolina

Posted 06 April 2010 - 03:33 PM

Senate Plaza, Cornell Arms and Finlay House probably got some flack before they went up.  Historically, Columbia has never been afraid go up until they set height restrictions in the Vista, and I don't think the Vista's historic district includes that parcel.  Something tells me DDRC will find it to be a hard opportunity to pass up, height and all.

#13 emerging.me

emerging.me

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,225 posts
  • Location:Columbia, SC

Posted 06 April 2010 - 05:51 PM

My prediction: They'll halve it.

#14 waccamatt

waccamatt

    Town

  • Members+
  • 3,824 posts
  • Location:Columbia, SC

Posted 06 April 2010 - 06:12 PM

View Postgrowingup15, on 06 April 2010 - 01:02 PM, said:

i just seen that on FOX Charlotte. and i was like OMG. that towers looks great it will be huge in Columbia and the tallest in the city. this is what the city really needed. i need to update my city website now on this

They would be 2nd tallest in the city, GU15, Capitol Center would still be the tallest. I'd rather see something of this height in a different location so that it would have an impact on the skyline. As far as comparing this to Adesso and the condos around WB, this would be an apartment complex instead of condos and target the student market, which is substantial. I'm sure students would love the same amenities from the complexes off Bluff Road in a spot where they can walk to the Vista, class, basketball and baseball games.

#15 Spartan

Spartan

    Gigalopolis

  • Global Moderators
  • 17,009 posts
  • Location:Charlotte, NC

Posted 06 April 2010 - 07:01 PM

When I was at Carolina I tried to get into Senate Plaza on Senate Street... The waiting list was forever, and no guarantees. Cornell Arms is the same (though easier to get into). Any high rise within walking distance to campus is essentially guaranteed money.

#16 krazeeboi

krazeeboi

    Gigalopolis

  • Moderators
  • 16,468 posts
  • Location:metro Atlanta

Posted 06 April 2010 - 08:47 PM

View Postemerging.me, on 06 April 2010 - 05:51 PM, said:

My prediction: They'll halve it.
That would be a better scenario. Two midrises of 14 stories each is more manageable at that location, IMO.

If this project does get built, Columbia would have really racked up a good amount of additions to the skyline within the span of a few years.

#17 CorgiMatt

CorgiMatt

    Town

  • Members+
  • 2,934 posts
  • Location:Columbia, South Carolina

Posted 07 April 2010 - 05:10 AM

I drove home on Blossom Street from my job in Springdale yesterday just to imagine what the tower(s) as proposed would look like on the skyline.  It actually would create balance once you hit the Blossom Street bridge, but Cayce could forget their dream of getting out from under Columbia's shadow, judging by how far back on Knox Abbott you would see the tower - like where the big turn in the road is by Love Chevrolet.

#18 Spartan

Spartan

    Gigalopolis

  • Global Moderators
  • 17,009 posts
  • Location:Charlotte, NC

Posted 07 April 2010 - 06:25 AM

I'm am generally in favor of anything that will remove a parking lot in favor of a building, so regardless of what gets built, it will be a step forward. We don't really have enough details about the design, and it usually changes as it goes through CDC review anyway. I do worry, however, that the blandness of Adesso sets a bad precedent for future development. I really don't want Innovista to become a stucco-only environment, or even that beige brick thing they've been using on campus. Beige is a crappy dominant color.

As for predictions regarding height, I agree that they will likely have to shorten it, and do several towers in stead. They could easily fit 3 or 4 medium sized towers on that site and still fit in with the Innovista Plan- and probably achieve greater densities overall.

#19 I Miss Columbia

I Miss Columbia

    Unincorporated Area

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 33 posts

Posted 17 April 2010 - 08:34 PM

I would love to see this in Columbia; however, I would rather see it in over on Bull Street.  I'll take it where I can get it, though!

#20 growingup15

growingup15

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 482 posts
  • Location:Columbia,sc

Posted 17 April 2010 - 10:40 PM

View PostI Miss Columbia, on 17 April 2010 - 08:34 PM, said:

I would love to see this in Columbia; however, I would rather see it in over on Bull Street.  I'll take it where I can get it, though!

I rather see bull street. get Multiple Towers in the center of the Project area. that would look cool to expand the Skyline. But, thats Another Topic on another forum page.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users