Greenville Annexations
#1
Posted 14 December 2010 - 10:36 AM
#2
Posted 14 December 2010 - 01:18 PM
I asked because I don't understand how apartment properties are taxed. Obviously, the renters pay no property tax. How is the landlord of such a complex taxed?
#3
Posted 14 December 2010 - 02:13 PM
Residents would be taxed based on the value of their registered automobiles.
Generally speaking, annexatons of this sort are financially beneficial because there is little added expense involved. Had it not been, it is doubtful the city would have pursued it.
This appears to be a by-product of the recent settlement between the city and the Wade Hampton Fire Department.
EDIT: The property is valued at over $24mm, so I would estimate the taxes at $130-140,000 annually, plus whatever the autos bring in.
Edited by vicupstate, 14 December 2010 - 02:38 PM.
#4
Posted 14 December 2010 - 02:38 PM
#5
Posted 14 December 2010 - 04:43 PM
vicupstate, on 14 December 2010 - 02:13 PM, said:
Residents would be taxed based on the value of their registered automobiles.
Generally speaking, annexatons of this sort are financially beneficial because there is little added expense involved. Had it not been, it is doubtful the city would have pursued it.
This appears to be a by-product of the recent settlement between the city and the Wade Hampton Fire Department.
EDIT: The property is valued at over $24mm, so I would estimate the taxes at $130-140,000 annually, plus whatever the autos bring in.
#6
Posted 03 March 2011 - 03:47 PM
Quote
The moves are among a list of priorities, including more park space on the Reedy River and downtown office tenants, that emerged from a recent City Council retreat.
Councilman David Sudduth said it’s a signal to taxpayers and city employees that the city isn’t going to cut its way to prosperity.
Mayor Knox White said the priorities are focused on growing the tax base and the population.
The city will focus more on filling its commercial corridors, developing major “gateways” to downtown, recruiting office tenants and charging business license fees that are more competitive and include incentives.
When it comes to population, White said the city is “really going to ratchet up the annexation,” in part by pursuing neighborhoods with data that can show roughly equal tax levels in some areas around the city.
Greenville’s estimated residential population of 61,782 is unusually small, ranking behind not just Columbia and Charleston but also North Charleston, Rock Hill and Mount Pleasant, while the county is the state’s largest by far.
It’s population cripples the city when it comes to landing retailers and federal funding, both of which tend to hang on population calculations.
Greenville News article.
Greenville to rachet up Annexation
Edited by vicupstate, 03 March 2011 - 03:48 PM.
#7
Posted 04 March 2011 - 12:03 AM
#8
Posted 04 March 2011 - 08:34 AM
vicupstate, on 03 March 2011 - 03:47 PM, said:
#9
Posted 16 March 2011 - 01:43 PM
#10
Posted 16 March 2011 - 05:51 PM
There are rumbling of more annexations to come. Hopefully, they will.
#11
Posted 16 March 2011 - 07:20 PM
#12
Posted 16 March 2011 - 10:21 PM
aceboogie, on 16 March 2011 - 07:20 PM, said:
Don't get me wrong, I definitely want to see Greenville's population numbers grow to represent its actual size. Bring on the dense annexations! But, it's worth noting, that this very "weird" situation has shown some benefits, which have worked in the favor of the City.
#13
Posted 17 March 2011 - 09:30 PM
GvilleSC, on 16 March 2011 - 10:21 PM, said:
Don't get me wrong, I definitely want to see Greenville's population numbers grow to represent its actual size. Bring on the dense annexations! But, it's worth noting, that this very "weird" situation has shown some benefits, which have worked in the favor of the City.
Perhaps it has worked to the benefit. But Greenville would gain much more if it was larger such as more federal funding and the sort. I'm also sure local Greenville politicians would love the tax base. By weird I mean we all know Rock Hill is no where near as urban as Greenville, yet its population is larger?
#14
Posted 21 March 2011 - 11:52 PM
aceboogie, on 17 March 2011 - 09:30 PM, said:
Rock Hill may as well be a suburb of Charlotte. A huge number of Rock Hill residents work in NC in Pineville, Charlotte, etc. With those (especially Charlotte) so close, Rock Hill will always have a hard time creating a dense, urban feel downtown (or anywhere for that matter). I attend Winthrop U in Rock Hill and there are a lot of people here! Drive on I-77 during 5:00 traffic and you'll see everyone coming home from work...actually, avoid that if possible.
#15
Posted 05 May 2011 - 03:34 PM
vicupstate, on 16 March 2011 - 05:51 PM, said:
There are rumbling of more annexations to come. Hopefully, they will.
According to the Grenville News Newcomers Guide, the city is 28.4 sq. miles now. Greer is 21.6, Mauldin 10, Simpsonville 7, Traveler's Rest 10.6 , Fountain Inn 6
#16
Posted 06 May 2011 - 11:12 AM
vicupstate, on 05 May 2011 - 03:34 PM, said:
#17
Posted 26 July 2011 - 07:37 AM
Quote
Mayor Knox White urged city leaders to hold conversations with remaining property owners not covered by the annexation because he said the delivery of services in the area could get confusing if one side of a road is in the city while the other side isn’t.
From Greenville News
#18
Posted 26 July 2011 - 08:41 AM
aceboogie, on 16 March 2011 - 07:20 PM, said:
Edited by apaladin, 26 July 2011 - 08:51 AM.
#20
Posted 22 August 2011 - 12:44 PM
Mayor White says there has been interest in annexation from businesses in the Cherrydale area.
My guess would be that restaurants in the area want to sell alcohol on Sundays, which can only happen if they are inside the city. The new strip center that is mostly restaurants between Home Depot and Cherrydale, would be a strong candidate, IMO.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













