Jump to content


- - - - -

I-(insert nuber here)


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Antrell Williams

Antrell Williams

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 959 posts
  • Location:Baton Rouge & Houston

Posted 07 July 2011 - 12:17 AM

Since the Baton Rouge metro has few north-south arteries, and I-55 is  outside of the metro, I drew this up. It's been in my head for some time  now, figured I'd post it here.

The major cities it traverses  through would be (from south to north) Houma, Baton Rouge, roughly  following Hwy 61 (Airline Hwy) to Natchez, Monroe, possibly El Dorado,  Pine Bluff, and using I-530 to connect to Little Rock/Conway.
The route could continue north to Springfield, MO using U.S. 65's route.

The  stretch of I-XX that would pass through our beloved Baton Rouge would  be in the eastern part of the parish, giving the north side (Zachary,  NBR, St. Francisville, etc) a faster connection to the city.

What  do you all think about it? Do we need it? This could permanently  replace the I-410 proposals that come up, while being cheaper for the  city itself (not sure) and not encouraging sprawl like the loop would  have done.

Keeping up with numbering rules, it would have to be either I-51 or I-53.

LA-AK stretch, each blue dot is representative of each of the major cities.

Posted Image

LA/MS stretch

Posted Image

 

#2 richyb83

richyb83

    Metropolis

  • Members+
  • 7,207 posts
  • Location:Baton Rouge

Posted 08 July 2011 - 11:17 PM

Hey Antrell...I can dig it :shades:  I sure would have used it on my trips to Arkansas & Houma...a lot of Hwy 61 is already 4-lane Interstate quality in MS to Natchez..

I'm guessing I-49 will finally be completed up to Texarkana?? However... north of that it looks like the rest will NEVER be built thru the Ouachita Mountains???  So this I-51 OR 53 would make it ideal/much easier for Gulf/ BR to KC/Omaha/Canada link (eventhough you would have to trek a west on I-40 to Fort Smith) That's the route I-49 was touting..maybe the mountains were too much $$ headache??

I-65 north of Conway would be nice..but with it so close to I-540(Ft Smith/Fayetteville/Joplin) it might not be as easy to pull off??

As it stands there is no easy/conveiniant way to get from BR to Houma...somehow they would have to implement the Sunshine Bridge or the Gramercy Bridge to nowhere that's finally supposed to be extended.

Keep them good idea's comin, :thumbsup:

Edited by richyb83, 08 July 2011 - 11:27 PM.


#3 Antrell Williams

Antrell Williams

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 959 posts
  • Location:Baton Rouge & Houston

Posted 09 July 2011 - 12:53 AM

I believe 9 of 11 segments of I-49 to AR are under construction. I really don't believe it will penetrate the Ouachitas in our lifetime. Yes we will have another connection rather than just I-55.

Instead of I-66, just rename I-530 I-51 and pick up off of I-40 in Conway when it turns west and I-51 continues to Springfield and then KC.

Little ambitious but that's what it takes..

#4 Antrell Williams

Antrell Williams

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 959 posts
  • Location:Baton Rouge & Houston

Posted 06 April 2012 - 10:54 AM

Ok, I'm bored again.

Taking into account my I-51 idea and I-110 being enxtended to just past Zachary, this is an alternate I-51 proposal. The first I-51 cut through many urban areas of BR so it would have been much more involved, this new proposal merely takes the place of 61 up to Natchez, creating bypasses for St. Francisville and Woodville, 425 to Vidalia would be designated I-51, past that point is pretty much straight to Monroe (or up to Bastrop) without any dedicated parallel.

Posted Image

Posted Image
I must have 50 different ideas for south LA as a whole.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users