Central Florida "Very Likely Location" for Virgin Spaceflights — Someday
Metro Orlando Airport News
#421
Posted 15 October 2010 - 01:36 PM
#422
Posted 20 October 2010 - 11:01 PM
Orlando International Airport is ready to start spending money to one day have a rail station for high-speed trains and possibly commuter and light-rail trains as well.
The Greater Orlando Aviation Authority board Wednesday approved $744,000 to expand and detail the airport's rail station proposal enough that the Florida Rail Commission soon can roll it into the state's overall rail plans.
MCO prepares for rail
Edited by DeepEyez, 20 October 2010 - 11:01 PM.
#423
Posted 26 October 2010 - 04:02 PM
#427
Posted 12 January 2011 - 05:52 PM
#428
Posted 12 January 2011 - 06:21 PM
#430
Posted 21 January 2011 - 06:14 PM
#433
#434
Posted 10 February 2011 - 11:08 PM
DeepEyez, on 10 February 2011 - 10:28 PM, said:
They're not trying to lure Southwest's headquarters-- they just don't want WN to take over the hometown airline and drop all the management jobs while downsizing operations. Orlando has to try something to minimize the damage done after the merger, doesn't it? And AirTran saw enough in this city to want to set up shop so the effort is not that absurd.
#436
Posted 13 April 2011 - 07:53 PM
Grand idea. Doesn't work. Beyond the obvious security issues (checking ids, matching luggage, etc.), the airline systems are so radically different that there is inherently going to be some kind of compromise.
More importantly, airlines have started (barely) realizing that their passengers are a little bit more than cargo. They are realizing that the service end is their only real chance to make a difference, and when airports force them all to become branding only, they loose any advantage they get. Airports have got to start realizing that the airport experience is a significant part of the travelers experience, and thus the airline really wants to make that much more pleasant. If airports dont want to keep fighting the airlines on fees, they have to start paying atte ntion to the airlines needs.
#437
Posted 17 April 2011 - 03:55 PM
#438
Posted 06 August 2011 - 07:40 AM
in any case........ does anyone have an idea about when they intend to break ground on the new south terminal complex? ive read numerous sentinel articles about them waiting until they max out the existing terminal before they break ground. in those articles it always listed that even if built out and made 100% efficient, the existing complex capacity is 38 million. we are currently just shy of 36 million. this is 6 million more than we were pre 9/11 when they were about to pull the trigger on the expansion.
now i know that they just finished renovating the original 2 airsides, but the renovation was purely aesthetic. the southwest terminal can be built out for more gates......... but i believe the terminal capacity bottleneck really is the landside complex, which cannot be expanded more.
so now we are at just shy of 36 million, and by years end, we may very well be over 36 million. these numbers are also in a recession economy, i can only imagine what happens when it improves. does anybody know any more updated info regarding this?
#439
Posted 06 August 2011 - 09:57 PM
shardoon, on 06 August 2011 - 07:40 AM, said:
in any case........ does anyone have an idea about when they intend to break ground on the new south terminal complex? ive read numerous sentinel articles about them waiting until they max out the existing terminal before they break ground. in those articles it always listed that even if built out and made 100% efficient, the existing complex capacity is 38 million. we are currently just shy of 36 million. this is 6 million more than we were pre 9/11 when they were about to pull the trigger on the expansion.
now i know that they just finished renovating the original 2 airsides, but the renovation was purely aesthetic. the southwest terminal can be built out for more gates......... but i believe the terminal capacity bottleneck really is the landside complex, which cannot be expanded more.
so now we are at just shy of 36 million, and by years end, we may very well be over 36 million. these numbers are also in a recession economy, i can only imagine what happens when it improves. does anybody know any more updated info regarding this?
At this point, with the economy the way it is, they are waiting for more of a reason to do it. I believe they say they have other ways to continue to expand capacity at existing terminals... I believe they will likely wait until it can't wait anymore, or some sort of train system makes its way to the airport, whether it be a sunrail connector or eventual HSR train or what... it likely won't happen until we get a new governor as the funding just isn't going to come with Rick Scott around.
#440
Posted 02 February 2012 - 07:57 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users















