Edited by citylife, 24 October 2011 - 11:51 AM.
Scott Towers highrise to be demolished?
#1
Posted 24 October 2011 - 11:50 AM
#2
Posted 24 October 2011 - 12:46 PM
Edited by GvilleSC, 24 October 2011 - 12:48 PM.
#3
Posted 24 October 2011 - 01:44 PM
I feel for the residents, but if they can be found better housing elsewhere, I won't miss this building myself. These high-rise government projects were a bad idea from the start.
I wonder if the building on North Main (forget the name) across from the City Court building would have the same issues?
#4
Posted 24 October 2011 - 01:47 PM
#5
Posted 24 October 2011 - 04:29 PM
#6
Posted 24 October 2011 - 07:39 PM
vicupstate, on 24 October 2011 - 01:44 PM, said:
I feel for the residents, but if they can be found better housing elsewhere, I won't miss this building myself. These high-rise government projects were a bad idea from the start.
I wonder if the building on North Main (forget the name) across from the City Court building would have the same issues?
Calhoun Towers is on North Main.
Edited by apaladin, 24 October 2011 - 07:40 PM.
#7
Posted 25 October 2011 - 07:39 AM
Vicupstate is talking about Towers East. Matter of fact that building and the one beside the transit authority transfer center are outdated and unsafe themselves.
#8
Posted 25 October 2011 - 09:13 AM
The fire trucks probably could reach the top of the building across from the transit station, it is only 7 or less stories, if memory serves.
#10
Posted 25 October 2011 - 11:06 AM
#11
Posted 26 October 2011 - 11:38 AM
Assuming the entire site is leveled, it offers a huge opportunity to create a new 'entrance' and 'extention' to the West End. It will be interesting to see what transpires.
#12
Posted 26 October 2011 - 12:25 PM
MAJIKMAN, on 25 October 2011 - 07:39 AM, said:
Vicupstate is talking about Towers East. Matter of fact that building and the one beside the transit authority transfer center are outdated and unsafe themselves.
Same building, still Calhoun Towers to those of us that's been around a while, just like the Daniel Building is still the Daniel Building.
#13
Posted 26 October 2011 - 10:31 PM
It’s difficult to imagine the complete cost for total demolition, removal, disposal, tenant relocation, new design and construction would be less than upgrading an existing building; especially if it had been done over the last several years.
Here is a Greensboro HA high rise for the elderly, built around the same period as Scott Towers, that has been renovated. Its facade is in better shape than Scott’s, but facades can be improved.
http://www.gha-nc.org/GHA%20Communities%204-09/gateway/gateway_directions.htm
Edited by hiker_nc, 26 October 2011 - 10:39 PM.
#14
Posted 28 October 2011 - 07:34 AM
I drove by the Towers East building today and I noticed sprinklers in the building, so I assume it is not in the same boat as the Scott Towers high-rise.
#15
Posted 28 October 2011 - 09:30 AM
#16
Posted 28 October 2011 - 10:06 AM
#17
Posted 29 October 2011 - 06:31 AM
vicupstate, on 28 October 2011 - 10:06 AM, said:
I was talking more on the medical emergencies side of things when I refereed to the elevators. Look, both buildings have the same issues and should not have been re-purposed this way. The companies that did this may have had good intentions. But it was bad business for the residents. Just my honest opinion.
#18
Posted Yesterday, 05:31 AM
MAJIKMAN, on 28 October 2011 - 09:30 AM, said:
Agreed.
With Scott Towers being demolished, the Greenville Summit residents also should be given the opportunity to relocate into other housing. At least the Greenville Summit is a historic building in a prime location for redevelopment. I don't see another need for a hotel downtown, but perhaps it could be converted into condos or apartments at market rates? I've never been inside, but looking in from the street, it probably has some potential but would need a lot of work to restore and update it.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













