Two New Interstates for GA?
#101
Posted 31 August 2006 - 03:18 PM
#102
Posted 14 September 2006 - 02:31 PM
#103
Posted 14 September 2006 - 02:48 PM
#104
Posted 17 September 2006 - 02:18 PM
#105
Posted 19 September 2006 - 10:47 AM
LizellaJacket, on Sep 17 2006, 03:18 PM, said:
Umm...I'm sure some folks in the pristine SC mountains may feel differently. But, I do agree it should be sent towards Greenville.
#106
Posted 20 September 2006 - 09:40 PM
LizellaJacket, on Sep 17 2006, 04:18 PM, said:
Via the proposed I-3 or I-24's eastern extention, another interstate will be coming through north Georgia's mountains. A route with minimal environmental impact and economic growth to these towns is carefully under consdieration.
Is US-441 supposed to be upgraded to a limited access highway between Athens and Gainesville with a bypass around Commerce?
#107
Posted 21 September 2006 - 06:57 AM
BoDragon, on Sep 20 2006, 11:40 PM, said:
For more on the routing and construction status of the entire project, you can check out GDOT's fact sheet for US 441.
#108
Posted 21 September 2006 - 05:10 PM
DaGABoyStinger, on Jun 7 2005, 11:14 PM, said:
Don't get me wrong, the idea is great, and in fact I think it is absolutely necessary for us to connect to other cities. My concern is just for feasibility of placement once you get to the Augusta area. I don't think our development patterns (especially in South Augusta) have prepared us for such an addition. And anyone knows, a REAL interstate can potentially cover a huge area, unlike other highways. I'm not expecting answers to these questions from anybody, just something to ponder, but feel free to speculate.
#109
Posted 18 October 2006 - 11:33 AM
#110
Posted 31 July 2007 - 09:55 AM
Spartan, on Jul 24 2004, 12:38 PM, said:
There are alot of excellent reasons to support these new interstates. Mostly, the economic impact they'd bring to the rest of GA, and even the southeast... I recently received a map pic in a mass e-mail to people in my industry. It envisions extending I-22 from Birmingham to Brunswick. I-14 is there along with extending I-81 south from TN to FL using i-185 through Columbus. Living in the Valley area on both sides of the GA/AL border, I can support all of this.
The way these are routed, it gets back to the original design of Interstates to connect urban areas without tearing through the center and causing big congestion issues. Blog Promotes SE Interstates
#111
Posted 31 July 2007 - 10:03 AM
BoDragon, on Sep 20 2006, 11:40 PM, said:
Is US-441 supposed to be upgraded to a limited access highway between Athens and Gainesville with a bypass around Commerce?
There's this blog that promotes new Southeastern Interestates and discusses extending I-30 from Little Rock through Huntsville, AL and Rome, GA across to Augusta and even ending at Hilton Head, SC. I-30 Extension
What I really like about it is it gets an Interstate across North GA without actually going directly into the mountains. It also looks like it gets north of some of the exurban Atlanta areas that some on this post have discussed. But what I love is it picks up metro areas (Rome, Huntsville) that aren't even on the Interestate system yet and connects them to important urban areas like Atlanta.
#112
Posted 31 July 2007 - 10:14 AM
Pillsbury, on Aug 31 2006, 05:18 PM, said:
Check out the proposed I-30 (replacing controversial I-3)... now looking at it with the I-14 south Augusta route, it creates a kind of southern Augusta metro perimeter around Ft. Gordon. I know Columbus would really like a Ft. Benning bypass (Maybe I-222???) to get to the southern metro area. How would that be in Augusta?
#113
Posted 31 July 2007 - 12:18 PM
#114
Posted 31 July 2007 - 01:08 PM
ATLman1, on Jul 31 2007, 02:18 PM, said:
I guess so... Although I think that's 3 Interstates (I-22, I-14, & I-81 (taking the place of I-185) - 222 looks like a loop around Ft. Benning using segments of I-22 and I-14.
#115
Posted 31 July 2007 - 01:25 PM
aboutmetro, on Jul 31 2007, 03:08 PM, said:
#116
Posted 31 July 2007 - 05:23 PM
#117
Posted 01 August 2007 - 11:38 AM
Spartan, on Jul 31 2007, 07:23 PM, said:
That map does look 'Columbus Centric', but that's just one of the maps of new Interestates proposed...
A funding mechanism idea from London and Paris.
If I-30 were build, along with an I-81 extension south through west GA, and if I-16 were extended west south of Atlanta, all of this would effectively create a mega-loop around ATL. Then any traffic on 20, 85 and 75 coming inside the mega-loop toward Atlanta, would have tolls for access to Atlanta. That would help fund the outer perimeter and discourage (thru traffic). Additional tolls would be installed for suburban commuter traffic coming from inside 285 into DT, MT, etc to fund Marta expansions. Atlanta is well in position to do this without harming its economy.
#118
Posted 03 August 2007 - 07:17 PM
btw, Id rather see the I-4 come into play, the route from Knoxville, TN to Augusta, GA to Savannah, GA ..... Augusta and Savannah need to come into play alot more.....the cities have a bigger impact on Georgia as a whole ....
Edited by 109investments, 04 August 2007 - 03:05 PM.
#119
Posted 15 August 2007 - 08:43 AM
aboutmetro, on Jul 31 2007, 10:55 AM, said:
The way these are routed, it gets back to the original design of Interstates to connect urban areas without tearing through the center and causing big congestion issues. Blog Promotes SE Interstates
I really do see this as overkill for the Columbus area. I think the I-14 is a great idea it would be a faster route when heading toward the eastcoast and also probaly relieve some of the traffic Metro Atlanta has on that east/west routes. Extending 185 to Tallahassee which was put before the state earlier this year is also good. Its a faster route for people to get to the panhandle beaches, as well as the tourist/travel dollars would really benifit the poorer counties of southwest georgia. but I-81 extension is a waste of money as well as 222 and 22. Traffic in Columbus is already get bad and the addition of 30,000+ people to the city population over the next 5 years is only making it worse. Imagine what 3 1/2 major interstates would do to the city. I say just a main east west route and a north south route are neccessary. a bypass is not needed as of yet maybe 20-30 years down the line. Has anyone heard anything on the status of I-3 & I-14 lately last i heard was in march of 2005 when they said Congress had approved the funds for the study of the routes. Anything since then?
Edited by mitchella81, 15 August 2007 - 08:46 AM.
#120
Posted 15 August 2007 - 10:24 AM
mitchella81, on Aug 15 2007, 09:43 AM, said:
Actually, I think that the skeleton of 22 and 222 are pretty much already in place. The highway between B'ham and Columbus is almost entirely fourlaned, as is Corridor Z from Columbus to Albany/Brunswick. If 22 and 222 followed that existing route, then all that would have to be done is to bring the roads to interstate standards. Certainly less costly than acquiring entirely new route thru condemnation.
I-81 is not only beneficial to Columbus -- it also relieves alot of the traffic that is funneled thru Atlanta. Thus, it could be considered as a boon to traffic in the Metro, as well as to W Ga.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













