#21
Posted 16 January 2012 - 06:46 PM
As for 8 lanes to Troutman, it is on the State TIP road planning list as unfunded, and obviously no discussion of transit planning will have anything to do with funding the freeway. It is currently prioritized to be widened to Exit 33 in 2020, and unfunded beyond that.
#22
Posted 17 January 2012 - 08:21 AM
Iredell can sit back and watch the economic growth to the south.
TH
#23
Posted 17 January 2012 - 08:40 AM
thetrick, on 17 January 2012 - 08:21 AM, said:
Iredell can sit back and watch the economic growth to the south.
TH
I agree actually. Initially, Mooresville was necessary because they needed a larger tax base to make the numbers float, but if you're talking about TIFs and alternate financing, they should be able to take Mooresville out.
Edited by The Escapists, 17 January 2012 - 08:43 AM.
#24
Posted 17 January 2012 - 08:56 AM
But alas, Lake Norman commuters will just have to accept higher tolls on the planned HOT lanes between Cornelius and Uptown. That's because it doesn't take many more drivers in the peak period to cause gridlock. And tolls should be priced accordingly to keep the new (north of I-485) and converted (where HOV today) lanes moving.
Edited by southslider, 17 January 2012 - 08:57 AM.
#25
Posted 17 January 2012 - 03:41 PM
#26
Posted 17 January 2012 - 10:32 PM
#27
Posted 19 January 2012 - 11:14 PM
Quote
and expresses some non-specific hope that their concerns can be effectively addressed before the project approval deadline according to Huntersvile Herald
http://www.huntersvi...r-rail-leaders/
Edited by kermit, 19 January 2012 - 11:15 PM.
#28
Posted 20 January 2012 - 08:28 AM
Quote
Railroad has ‘serious concerns’ about commuter rail plan
http://www.bizjourna...d.html?ana=e_ph
#29
Posted 21 January 2012 - 12:49 PM
#30
Posted 30 January 2012 - 12:26 PM
http://www.charlotte...stions-red.html
I always had wondered why they never seemed to talk about specifics in regards to NS and why NS people were not at the meetings, but I just thought they (Meck and CATS) had it under control. Turns out they do not.
NS owns the tracks!! How in the world could you propose this idea with out NS being in 100% agreement? This is insane. I am a big supporter of the red line, but this it a pretty big screw up on the city’s part.
TH
#31
Posted 30 January 2012 - 01:17 PM
#32
Posted 30 January 2012 - 02:52 PM
I can't help but think, though, that maybe they always assumed back when fed money was sought, that it would never happen, and then briefly it seemed plausible with the newer financing plans, and they saw an opening to pile on with bad news after Mooresville leaders didn't want it.
It is a shame that railroad companies are so opposed to passenger rail. But they seem to always be against it.
#33
Posted 30 January 2012 - 03:41 PM
I noticed that in one of the past articles they mentioned using Amtrak to run the red line. Now looking back I know why, the freight railroads are required by law to allow Amtrak to operate on their rails at a reasonable cost. This would be one way to force NS to allow the project, but it does not make for a very cooperative partner.
TH
#34
Posted 30 January 2012 - 03:55 PM
#35
Posted 30 January 2012 - 08:26 PM
#36
Posted 21 February 2012 - 03:04 PM
Quote
#37
Posted 21 February 2012 - 04:10 PM
#38
Posted 22 February 2012 - 07:58 AM
#39
Posted 22 February 2012 - 08:10 AM
#40
Posted 22 February 2012 - 09:41 AM
Windsurfer, on 22 February 2012 - 08:10 AM, said:
It's not so much about some big customer, it's the dozens of smaller customers that litter the line. Like Pactive Corp, which has a dozen cars at their site or FXI which has about 8 cars. I found these companies looking at a very small part of the line. Don't forget Gerdau Ameristeel's steel mill which is the bulk of the lines traffic south of Mooresville. NS upgraded the rail between Gerdau and the charlotte yard just to handle the heavy loads into and out of this plant. The Line up to just south of Mooresville is served daily M-F from Charlotte, Mooresville and north is served by a local out of Spencer. This is actually pretty busy for a line only hauling local traffic.
I am all for the red line, but the city should have had the railroad operations as a top priority, and that just does not seem to have been the case.
TH
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













