Obama for president in 2012? Will you vote for him?
Started by
Charlotteman
, Jan 24 2012 10:57 PM
27 replies to this topic
#21
Posted 06 May 2012 - 01:32 PM
George Bush would never have been president. He did not win a simple majority of the voters. Without the help of Florida's voting fiasco and a brother that happened to be governor at the time, he would have been another side note in history.
#22
Posted 10 May 2012 - 09:55 AM
nashbill, on 06 May 2012 - 01:32 PM, said:
George Bush would never have been president. He did not win a simple majority of the voters. Without the help of Florida's voting fiasco and a brother that happened to be governor at the time, he would have been another side note in history.
I still believe Al Gore really won that election. After thousands of votes in heavily a democratic county mysteriously got thrown out, I'm convinced of that.
#23
Posted 11 May 2012 - 01:14 PM
President Obama just gave a tepid nod of "support" for gay marriage, during a television interview. Vice President Biden delivered a message of firm support for gay marriage prior to Obama's carefully worded statement.
Gay marriage is being used as a wedge issue by both sides. Of course right wing Republicans love gay bashing, and will use this whole thing to appeal to their lowest echelon base....but the Democrats used it in a most awful manner.
Pres. Obama and Vice President Biden started all the gay dialog during final preparations and the announcement that Chinese banks will now be allowed to open/operate in the U.S. All the gay talk diverted the public's attention from this surprising development.
http://businessnewsd...ank-to-us/3809/
In communist China aren't things "owned by the people/government"? If so, does the Chinese government effectively own Chinese banks?
If China does indeed have control/ultimate ownership of the Chinese banks, that means one thing: Communist Chinese banks will be operating on U.S. soil.
Is this something Americans will accept? The American people seemed to have accepted most manufacturing jobs being transferred to China, so perhaps they will accept this banking thing too.
I personally think it's an outrage that Obama and Biden started all the gay talk to divert the public's attention from this most startling development. Shame on Obama, Biden and their campaign team for this nefarious, ugly, well thought out staged performance.
***and by the way, Obama still hasn't aggressively pushed for DOMA's repeal, has he? And I would be surprised if he lifts one single finger to advance gay marriage. He wants gay dollars and gay votes. He might fool some gay people. He certainly doesn't fool me. Obama and Biden are, in my opinion, just savy, and sometimes sinister political operatives.
Gay marriage is being used as a wedge issue by both sides. Of course right wing Republicans love gay bashing, and will use this whole thing to appeal to their lowest echelon base....but the Democrats used it in a most awful manner.
Pres. Obama and Vice President Biden started all the gay dialog during final preparations and the announcement that Chinese banks will now be allowed to open/operate in the U.S. All the gay talk diverted the public's attention from this surprising development.
http://businessnewsd...ank-to-us/3809/
In communist China aren't things "owned by the people/government"? If so, does the Chinese government effectively own Chinese banks?
If China does indeed have control/ultimate ownership of the Chinese banks, that means one thing: Communist Chinese banks will be operating on U.S. soil.
Is this something Americans will accept? The American people seemed to have accepted most manufacturing jobs being transferred to China, so perhaps they will accept this banking thing too.
I personally think it's an outrage that Obama and Biden started all the gay talk to divert the public's attention from this most startling development. Shame on Obama, Biden and their campaign team for this nefarious, ugly, well thought out staged performance.
***and by the way, Obama still hasn't aggressively pushed for DOMA's repeal, has he? And I would be surprised if he lifts one single finger to advance gay marriage. He wants gay dollars and gay votes. He might fool some gay people. He certainly doesn't fool me. Obama and Biden are, in my opinion, just savy, and sometimes sinister political operatives.
Edited by Charlotteman, 11 May 2012 - 01:43 PM.
#24
Posted 11 May 2012 - 02:49 PM
Honestly I think the majority vote should rule, not the electoral college. If the majority vote ruled, democrats would win almost every election due to highly populated urban areas across the country.
#25
Posted 11 May 2012 - 06:53 PM
Yahoo News has oodles of "news" articles today that are naked propaganda. All suggesting black voters will still vote for Obama, even if they are religiously opposed to gay marriage.
The articles "interviewed" two or three black people, and the corporate controlled media created three made-up "news" stories out of it. A sickening display of corporate media attempting to meddle in U.S. elections.
We can now consider Yahoo News to be in the gutter of corporate American "journalism", along with CNN, Fox, et al.
The articles "interviewed" two or three black people, and the corporate controlled media created three made-up "news" stories out of it. A sickening display of corporate media attempting to meddle in U.S. elections.
We can now consider Yahoo News to be in the gutter of corporate American "journalism", along with CNN, Fox, et al.
#26
Posted 14 May 2012 - 07:43 PM
Re: Obama's Harvard Teaching Credentials..
another sham.
One of the President's most sterling resume items is his teaching stint at Harvard. Turns out Obama wouldn't have gotten that position in a million years if Henry Kissinger hadn't personally aggravated his Harvard buddies to death, to agree to it.
Turns out there is much circumstancial evidence showing Kissinger assisted in the "grooming" of Obama as "a future black president" all those years ago. Adding to Obama's almost nonexistent resume was a must, and Kissinger did a good job.
It is said that Zbigniew Brezinski "discovered" Obama back then, and groomed him over the years, for the Elite---- to be a puppet president, sometime in the future. Kissinger and other Elites in high positions also assisted.
Just another fraud regarding Obama. Let's face it folks, Obama has the most shadowy past....issue after issue. Who is the hell is Barack Obama? Is he essentially just a made-up character?
another sham.
One of the President's most sterling resume items is his teaching stint at Harvard. Turns out Obama wouldn't have gotten that position in a million years if Henry Kissinger hadn't personally aggravated his Harvard buddies to death, to agree to it.
Turns out there is much circumstancial evidence showing Kissinger assisted in the "grooming" of Obama as "a future black president" all those years ago. Adding to Obama's almost nonexistent resume was a must, and Kissinger did a good job.
It is said that Zbigniew Brezinski "discovered" Obama back then, and groomed him over the years, for the Elite---- to be a puppet president, sometime in the future. Kissinger and other Elites in high positions also assisted.
Just another fraud regarding Obama. Let's face it folks, Obama has the most shadowy past....issue after issue. Who is the hell is Barack Obama? Is he essentially just a made-up character?
Edited by Charlotteman, 14 May 2012 - 07:46 PM.
#27
Posted 15 May 2012 - 06:42 PM
Obama has recently praised JP Morgan/Chase as a good bank, and Jamie Dimon "one of the smartest bankers we have".
An absolutely preposterous thing for the President to have said! After all the billions of dollars of dollars lost by Chase/Dimon recently, they deserve to be prosecuted, not praised.
It was later revealed that the President and Mrs. Obama have between $500,00-1,000,000 in private Chase accounts~
Further coincidence..ummm...to me, it's just further evidence that Obama is a Corporatist/Bankster puppet.
http://news.yahoo.co...-213119081.html
An absolutely preposterous thing for the President to have said! After all the billions of dollars of dollars lost by Chase/Dimon recently, they deserve to be prosecuted, not praised.
It was later revealed that the President and Mrs. Obama have between $500,00-1,000,000 in private Chase accounts~
Further coincidence..ummm...to me, it's just further evidence that Obama is a Corporatist/Bankster puppet.
http://news.yahoo.co...-213119081.html
Edited by Charlotteman, 15 May 2012 - 07:13 PM.
#28
Posted 18 May 2012 - 01:52 PM
I can't speak for Jamie Dimon, but you do realize that in 1895, J.P. Morgan bailed out the US government right? I would say that the US is, in a way, indebted to JP Morgan/Chase.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













