Greenville Transit
#1
Posted 11 September 2004 - 10:12 PM
#2
Posted 12 September 2004 - 04:07 AM
#3
Posted 12 September 2004 - 10:34 AM
I think that your idea has potential. The problem would be going through that historic neighborhood (I think its called Washington Heights). People in that vicinity wouldn't be thrillied about it at all. But actually going beneath downtown should be a major problem since its largely on a hill.
#4
Posted 12 September 2004 - 12:20 PM
#5
Posted 12 September 2004 - 01:09 PM
On the idea of the tunnel, what I was thinking is deep bore under Washington, cutting north under Main/Coffee/Spring, and then having another station under where the old auditorium stood. It would continue in tunnel under Laurens/Stone Ave, and the old rail line, the "South Line" is almost totally parallel to Laurens Rd, in its own ROW. I realize that it would be expensive, but in retrospect, didn't Pittsburgh and St Louis have tunnels that prexisted, but they had to retrofit them for LRT? So outright building a tunnel would be doing it right the first time. I'll try to find some more info on cost, and distance from Amtrak to the old ROW.
Also, there has been talk of a system in Anderson of all places, one that uses the existing ROW along Clemson Blvd, from around the mall area, up to Clemson Unv. I've heard more of this than anything else happening in Greenville or our area at that.
#6
Posted 12 September 2004 - 01:27 PM


#7
Posted 12 September 2004 - 07:57 PM
I haven't heard about the thing with Anderson and Clemson. That would seem to be more feasible if college students could be convinced that Anderson is the place to go.
#8
Posted 12 September 2004 - 11:51 PM
#9
Posted 13 September 2004 - 06:44 PM
#10
Posted 13 September 2004 - 07:11 PM
#12
Posted 13 September 2004 - 07:40 PM
#13
Posted 13 September 2004 - 07:56 PM
#14
Posted 13 September 2004 - 08:54 PM
Greenville-Spartanburg has a better chance b/c of its sprawling population.
But I do think it would make more sense to put commuter rail in a more urban environment. Oh well?
#15
Posted 13 September 2004 - 09:23 PM
#16
Posted 14 September 2004 - 03:50 AM
#17
Posted 15 September 2004 - 10:35 PM
#18
Posted 16 September 2004 - 10:41 AM
jarvisj3, on Sep 15 2004, 10:35 PM, said:

This is what it's supposed to look like going through the eastern half of the country.

South Carolina HSR (High Speed Rail)

But to answer your question I haven't heard of one but then again this project isn't my specialty. It would make sense though there is a lot of interaction between those cities.
Edited by The_sandlapper, 16 September 2004 - 10:46 AM.
#19
Posted 16 September 2004 - 11:57 AM
The SC routes ought to include a conneciton between Greenville/Spartanburg, Columbia, and Charleston
#20
Posted 18 September 2004 - 07:51 PM
The thing that sucks about the SC portion though is that it won't travel as fast as its neighbors Georgia, and N. Carolina (70-110), instead it will go 65-70mph. It's due because of the way the tracks are laid out in the areas of the state.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













