Jump to content


- - - - -

Greenville Transit


  • Please log in to reply
1115 replies to this topic

#1 jarvismj

jarvismj

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 481 posts
  • Location:Cambridge, MA / Greenville, SC

Posted 11 September 2004 - 10:12 PM

I was reading in the forum that Greenville bought the land to run commuter rail. I'm familar with this "line" and to be honest, I feel that LRT would be a better option, ecspecially with the fact that the north line is only about 11 miles, at the longest. If anyone here is familiar with the Greenville area, we also have another rail line, one that  I'll refer to as the "south line" which goes southeast from downtown, by downtown airport, crossing Haywood Rd, and going into the Mauldin/Simpsonville area. My idea, and everyone has told me how stupid it is, but since the lines do not connect, they could   connect the two via a short tunnel, one that begins by the Amtrak station on Washington     St, going under Washington, with a station at the bus transfer center, and another one over between the Courthouse/proposed Gateway Tower (where the old auditorium once  stood) and the BiLo Center. My best estimation, is that the total length would not be more than 2 miles. Is it just me that thinks that this could be done? By doing something like that, it would be good for not only traffic, but it would be building something that can be expanded at a later time. My reason for saying this, is that I lived outside Baltimore/Washington, and the traffic there was never as bad as it is here, and I feel that something has to be done, before they widen 385 to 6 lanes each way.

 

#2 motonenterprises

motonenterprises

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 671 posts
  • Location:Greenville, SC(Simpsonville)

Posted 12 September 2004 - 04:07 AM

Traffic worse in Greenville than right outside Washington/Baltimore? Wow!

#3 Spartan

Spartan

    Gigalopolis

  • Global Moderators
  • 17,009 posts
  • Location:Charlotte, NC

Posted 12 September 2004 - 10:34 AM

Welcome to the forum jarvis!

I think that your idea has potential. The problem would be going through that historic neighborhood (I think its called Washington Heights). People in that vicinity wouldn't be thrillied about it at all. But actually going beneath downtown should be a major problem since its largely on a hill.

#4 monsoon

monsoon

    Megalopolis

  • Members+
  • 10,598 posts

Posted 12 September 2004 - 12:20 PM



#5 jarvismj

jarvismj

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 481 posts
  • Location:Cambridge, MA / Greenville, SC

Posted 12 September 2004 - 01:09 PM

what I meant by traffic being worse here, is that it seems that everyone behind the wheel is either not paying attention to traffic, or they have a suicide death wish. Don't believe me, just hit Orchard Park @ Haywood between 3:30 and 7:00PM.
On the idea of the tunnel, what I was thinking is deep bore under Washington, cutting north under Main/Coffee/Spring, and then having another station under where the old auditorium stood. It would continue in tunnel under Laurens/Stone Ave, and the old rail line, the "South Line" is almost totally parallel to Laurens Rd, in its own ROW.  I realize that it would be expensive, but in retrospect, didn't Pittsburgh and St Louis have tunnels that prexisted, but they had to retrofit them for LRT? So outright building a tunnel would be doing it right the first time. I'll try to find some more info on cost, and distance from Amtrak to the old ROW.

Also, there has been talk of a system in Anderson of all places, one that uses the existing ROW along Clemson Blvd, from around the mall area, up to Clemson Unv. I've heard more of this than anything else happening in Greenville or our area at that.

#6 jarvismj

jarvismj

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 481 posts
  • Location:Cambridge, MA / Greenville, SC

Posted 12 September 2004 - 01:27 PM

Posted Image

Posted Image

Posted Image

#7 Spartan

Spartan

    Gigalopolis

  • Global Moderators
  • 17,009 posts
  • Location:Charlotte, NC

Posted 12 September 2004 - 07:57 PM

I see what you mean now. It makes sense to me. The only real problem with your idea is getting other people to see the feasablitliy of it. I think perhaps that Greenville will begin to see mass transit with a Main St trolley, which will gradually be expanded as downtown grows, and people begin to live in downtown neighborhoods. As much demand as there is for housing in Downtown, I see no reason why a highrise residential tower is out of the question. All of this will have to build on itself over time.

I haven't heard about the thing with Anderson and Clemson. That would seem to be more feasible if college students could be convinced that Anderson is the place to go.

#8 motonenterprises

motonenterprises

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 671 posts
  • Location:Greenville, SC(Simpsonville)

Posted 12 September 2004 - 11:51 PM

So this is basically a subway system? Would be nice to have in Greenville!

#9 Spartan

Spartan

    Gigalopolis

  • Global Moderators
  • 17,009 posts
  • Location:Charlotte, NC

Posted 13 September 2004 - 06:44 PM

It seems to be more ilke Atlanta's MARTA where it is only unergounrd near downtown, its more of a LRT than anything..

#10 jarvismj

jarvismj

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 481 posts
  • Location:Cambridge, MA / Greenville, SC

Posted 13 September 2004 - 07:11 PM

Thats the idea, that it is an LRT, but one that runs underground in the city center. Here in the upstate, we are lucky, that we have somewhat of a good rail ROW that we don't have to elevate or go underground for very long distances.  I would hate to have run LRT down the street though, seeing as what happened in Houston, but with what little we do now, it can easily be expanded to places such as Easley, or GSP Airport, or even Spartanburg or Clemson. It's just a matter of being more open minded and not worrying about what others think. I strongly feel that the actual city of Greenville would more than likely go for something like this, seeing that they are slowing getting rid of the blue laws,  it's just the county that drags it's feet.  If there were a system that this would copy it would either be St Louis, or Pittsburgh.  Something with both high and low level boarding. This can be done, and in fact, I found a *.pdf online from a consulting firm that planned this out, but a slight variation.... I'll try to link to it

#11 jarvismj

jarvismj

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 481 posts
  • Location:Cambridge, MA / Greenville, SC

Posted 13 September 2004 - 07:17 PM

Adobe PDF for LRT in Greenville.

I'm not the only crazy one.

#12 monsoon

monsoon

    Megalopolis

  • Members+
  • 10,598 posts

Posted 13 September 2004 - 07:40 PM



#13 Spartan

Spartan

    Gigalopolis

  • Global Moderators
  • 17,009 posts
  • Location:Charlotte, NC

Posted 13 September 2004 - 07:56 PM

Thats awsome. I didn't know Charleston had an LRT proposal. I'll have to look into that.

#14 The_sandlapper

The_sandlapper

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,176 posts
  • Location:The SC Sandhills

Posted 13 September 2004 - 08:54 PM

Charleston has had a proposal for a while now. However I don't think it will happen there yet.

Greenville-Spartanburg has a better chance b/c of its sprawling population.

But I do think it would make more sense to put commuter rail in a more urban environment. Oh well?

#15 Spartan

Spartan

    Gigalopolis

  • Global Moderators
  • 17,009 posts
  • Location:Charlotte, NC

Posted 13 September 2004 - 09:23 PM

I've always thought a Greenville to Spartanburg line would do well, with stops at Greenville, Taylors, Greer, Airport, Duncan, Spartanburg. Then spur lines and other smaller stops. Stops at the malls would be necessary, and this would need to tie in with the North/South line in Greenville that this thread is about.

#16 monsoon

monsoon

    Megalopolis

  • Members+
  • 10,598 posts

Posted 14 September 2004 - 03:50 AM



#17 jarvismj

jarvismj

    Hamlet

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 481 posts
  • Location:Cambridge, MA / Greenville, SC

Posted 15 September 2004 - 10:35 PM

The Asheville Forum was talking about high speed rail coming to the area, and in what little I know, I realize that the main High Speed corridor is almost parallel to I-85. Well, is there a rail line or ROW that goes from Greenville to Asheville that could be used for that purpose or for commuter rain between the two cities?

#18 The_sandlapper

The_sandlapper

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,176 posts
  • Location:The SC Sandhills

Posted 16 September 2004 - 10:41 AM

jarvisj3, on Sep 15 2004, 10:35 PM, said:

The Asheville Forum was talking about high speed rail coming to the area, and in what little I know, I realize that the main High Speed corridor is almost parallel to I-85. Well, is there a rail line or ROW that goes from Greenville to Asheville that could be used for that purpose or for commuter rain between the two cities?
Here's what part of the SE high speed rail corridor is supposed to look like going through the Carolinas and Georgia.
Posted Image


This is what it's supposed to look like going through the eastern half of the country.
Posted Image

South Carolina HSR (High Speed Rail)
Posted Image

But to answer your question I haven't heard of one but then again this project isn't my specialty.  It would make sense though there is a lot of interaction between those cities.

Edited by The_sandlapper, 16 September 2004 - 10:46 AM.


#19 Spartan

Spartan

    Gigalopolis

  • Global Moderators
  • 17,009 posts
  • Location:Charlotte, NC

Posted 16 September 2004 - 11:57 AM

There is probably more interaction between Asheville and Spartanburg since they are on the same Interstate.

The SC routes ought to include a conneciton between Greenville/Spartanburg, Columbia, and Charleston

#20 The_sandlapper

The_sandlapper

    Burg

  • Members+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,176 posts
  • Location:The SC Sandhills

Posted 18 September 2004 - 07:51 PM

There are plans to extend the line to the coast Charleston & Myrtle Beach.

The thing that sucks about the SC portion though is that it won't travel as fast as its neighbors Georgia, and N. Carolina (70-110), instead it will go 65-70mph. It's due because of the way the tracks are laid out in the areas of the state.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users