Greenville Transit
#41
Posted 28 September 2005 - 10:23 AM
#42
Posted 30 September 2005 - 04:59 PM
Another issue being worked out is who would get the land being freed up, and how that would be handled.
#43
Posted 14 November 2005 - 12:00 AM
http://www.greenvill...EWS01/511130317
The article is about light rail in Greenville, potentially within the decade. Good read!
#44
Posted 15 November 2005 - 06:49 AM
Greenville, on Nov 14 2005, 12:00 AM, said:
http://www.greenvill...EWS01/511130317
The article is about light rail in Greenville, potentially within the decade. Good read!
#45
Posted 16 November 2005 - 05:24 PM
But at the same time, being able to get from Greenville to Atlanta and Clt so fast would make the sprawl from those cities creep into the upstate much faster than it already is.
#46
Posted 16 November 2005 - 05:35 PM
#47
Posted 17 November 2005 - 05:35 AM
However, I think light rail would have more riders than the aforementioned bus service. I know I'd ride it.
#48
Posted 17 November 2005 - 07:21 AM
#49
Posted 17 November 2005 - 09:22 AM
monsoon, on Nov 17 2005, 08:21 AM, said:
The state is cash strapped as it is. I predict the creation of a local transit tax district (or the expansion of the current one), as well as muni bonds to pay for it.
Again, tax, tax, tax. If it does come down to this, I also predict local voters will kill it off.
#50
Posted 17 November 2005 - 09:30 AM
upstate29650, on Nov 17 2005, 10:22 AM, said:
What is different about the people of the upstate than say the people in Charlotte/Mecklenburg 90 miles away where they did vote for a mass transit sales tax? That tax has made it possible for the city to have started construction of its first light rail line.
#51
Posted 17 November 2005 - 09:42 AM
monsoon, on Nov 17 2005, 11:30 AM, said:
In Charlotte, (i) traffic is worse, (ii) business leaders have really pushed for it (the big banks' heads have a lot of influence, and one of them is very pro-downtown development/mass transit, and (iii) there aren't as many anti-tax/pro-libertarian advocates in Charlotte as in G'ville.
#52
Posted 17 November 2005 - 09:44 AM
monsoon, on Nov 17 2005, 10:30 AM, said:
Case & Point: Last week, voters in Pickens County (Greenville suburb), voted against a 1% sales tax increase for schools.
Local voters said no to taxes for schools. You expect them to vote yes for a transit initiative? (yes, I understand they're in a different county, but mindsets do transcend borders.)
Charlotte's traffic is worse than Grenville's. I think we can agree on that. if we're ever to get light rail here, it would take a private company paying a hefty portion of it, and I can't see that happening.
#53
Posted 17 November 2005 - 09:53 AM
#54
Posted 17 November 2005 - 09:58 AM
#55
Posted 17 November 2005 - 10:03 AM
monsoon, on Nov 17 2005, 10:53 AM, said:
Look at it this way: I don't think most people here think transportation has reached a "critical mass". That being said, I'd think if given a choice, more people would vote to fund schools over light rail.
Sure, two different issues, but it still speaks to people's views as a whole, which is....we're being taxed too much!
#56
Posted 17 November 2005 - 10:05 AM
I like the results I'm seeing. Now if we could just do something about teacher salaries and the quality of teaching in public schools...
#57
Posted 17 November 2005 - 10:18 AM
upstate29650, on Nov 17 2005, 10:44 AM, said:
Local voters said no to taxes for schools. You expect them to vote yes for a transit initiative? (yes, I understand they're in a different county, but mindsets do transcend borders.)
#58
Posted 17 November 2005 - 10:51 AM
I would go into how I feel about the school system, but this is about mass transit, so I will save that for another time and another thread.
I wish the uncertainty about the north-south rail line would come to an end. The groups that are trying to buy it to reopen it are making a mistake in trying to have a rail line for industry that is no longer there, and not coming back. The community as a whole would be better served by a 10-15 year plan to use this as a light rail line, while currently using it as a walking trail. This would create a reason to redevelop some of the old industrial areas along the line into new/future TODs. Which I think in turn would make the whole idea of the line more appealing.
#59
Posted 17 November 2005 - 01:39 PM
#60
Posted 17 November 2005 - 06:16 PM
Although I can't see passenger service needed in Marietta, I can see a North-South line terminating in Travelers Rest, for sure. This would benefit residents of this part of the county (which is growing very fast, although not at the same rate as Simpsonville, Mauldin, or Greer). It would also be of benefit to the students at Furman University. Additionally, it would benefit the residents of other parts of the county by providing them with an alternate means to visit the foothills without driving.
I still prefer the use of these Rights of Way for Rails-to-Trails though. However, if by some chance, there is room for both light rail and Trails along these Rights of Way, I think this would definitely be something that would benefit our entire community and enhance our overall health and quality of life.
Edited by RestedTraveler, 17 November 2005 - 06:18 PM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













