Triangle road & traffic thread
#41
Posted 21 July 2005 - 07:05 AM
#42
Posted 23 July 2005 - 09:32 AM
All i have to say is, WHY NOT MAKE US 1 a freeway to the Henderson Bypass!? ;P
#43
Posted 25 July 2005 - 08:15 AM
#44
Posted 26 July 2005 - 12:10 AM
Jerseyman4, on Jul 23 2005, 10:32 AM, said:
#45
Posted 04 August 2005 - 11:49 PM
#46
Posted 05 August 2005 - 04:51 AM
I would say that a freeway upgrade (Jersey Freeway, like Independence - I'm not talking "interstate" here) between I-540 and I-440 is every bit as essential as the Independence freeway in Charlotte.
North of 540 I wouldn't say it's essential yet because things still flow smoothly all the way to the Henderson bypass. But the idea is to make it a freeway before it becomes overrun with development.
#47
Posted 05 August 2005 - 11:27 AM
For the area south of I-540, I don't know if anything can be done about it? This actually might be a good thing as Raleigh grows. It may boost development closer to the city core if people weigh the pros and cons of commuting time. I also see this as a plus to the TTA and plans for future rail lines to northern Wake. I just don't think the answer is to spend billions of dollars on a road system if it will only encourage further sprawl and cookie-cutter developments. Those who work in RTP use 540 anyhow and will continue to contribute to the growth here. It would be nice to displace those persons not working in western wake/RTP by making newcomers re-evaluate their place of residence.
Just an initial thought...I would enjoy feedback if you think this might be a poor idea.
#48
Posted 10 August 2005 - 11:55 AM
Construct I-540 from NC 55 South to NC 55 North $8,800,000 High Priority
Durham and Chatham Counties, NC Completion
of American Tobacco Trail.
$1,600,000 High Priority
Construct bicycle and pedestrian trails, Durham
and Durham County
$1,600,000 High Priority
US 64 upgrade and improvement between
Raleigh, NC and Rocky Mount
$5,000,000 High Priority
Acquisition of rail corridors for use as bicycle and
pedestrian trails, Durham
$2,000,000 High Priority
#49
Posted 10 August 2005 - 02:28 PM
US1 should be a freeway from downtown Raleigh to I95.
#50
Posted 10 August 2005 - 02:45 PM
avery, on Aug 5 2005, 11:27 AM, said:
For the area south of I-540, I don't know if anything can be done about it? This actually might be a good thing as Raleigh grows. It may boost development closer to the city core if people weigh the pros and cons of commuting time. I also see this as a plus to the TTA and plans for future rail lines to northern Wake. I just don't think the answer is to spend billions of dollars on a road system if it will only encourage further sprawl and cookie-cutter developments. Those who work in RTP use 540 anyhow and will continue to contribute to the growth here. It would be nice to displace those persons not working in western wake/RTP by making newcomers re-evaluate their place of residence.
Just an initial thought...I would enjoy feedback if you think this might be a poor idea.
Living close to downtown and having a short against-the-grain commute to work, I have always thought that mass grid lock outside of downtown was great. Pay the price for making poor decisions I say to those stuck in traffic. The mess outside of town will hopefully send the value of my place sky high as people start to vie for limited downtown space, so when I retire one day I can have a nice spread way out in the wilderness with solar panels, pure well water, and all the trappings that allow me to be self sufficient and off the grid.
The likely scenario for Capital Blvd. is one where there are no more stoplights but property access will remain, albeit only on one side of the road or the other.
There is also the 'jug handle' concept that NJ used on US 1 where there are no left turns, making the left lanes truly the fast lane with (haha) Jersey barriers separating the highway all along its length.
#51
Posted 10 August 2005 - 03:02 PM
#52
Posted 10 August 2005 - 03:09 PM
#53
Posted 10 August 2005 - 06:48 PM
Next up should be completion of the US64 freeway between Cary and Apex.
#54
Posted 11 August 2005 - 08:57 AM
Wondering when it says 55 North to 55 South does that mean that I-40 to 55 North will be left out. That be sort of dumb to have a gap there right throught the research triangle park?
Any insights into this?
#55
Posted 11 August 2005 - 09:54 AM
Quote
#56
Posted 11 August 2005 - 10:04 AM
Quote
That means the Western Wake Freeway, from NC55 in RTP through Cary and Apex to NC 55 in Holly Springs.
#57
Posted 21 September 2005 - 12:21 AM
http://www.newsobser...p-9241557c.html
On a side note, why the heck is the state spending all this money building 4 lane highways to nowhere in Eastern NC. I'm sure farmer joe doen't have to deal with traffic jams every day while sitting on his tractor. I just don't understand. This new policy of taking money from urban areas and giving more money to the rural areas doesn't make sense to me. Do they expect Eastern NC to magically turn into this economic engine? I see no one burning up the road to live in the middle of a tobacco field LOL. Okay, I'm off my soap box now. Just my $0.02.
#58
Posted 21 September 2005 - 09:50 AM
#59
Posted 21 September 2005 - 10:45 AM
willrusso, on Sep 21 2005, 12:21 AM, said:
There are taxpayers east of I-95 and I-40 that deserve a fair share of highway improvements since eastern carolina is large part of the state since two lane roads is not the way to travel today. If there are little to no projects to go around instead by bringing a large chunk exclusively to the metro areas only, it would make eastern carolina and the remaining rural areas of the state undesirable for new commerce and new residents to establish anything while increasing travel time. In eastern carolina, US 64, US 264, US 117, US 17 and in my opinion on the last one, NC 11 are major eastern carolina routes connecting the major towns. The tourism industry is also growing along the coastline as well so highways leading to the coast and within the eastern carolina region needs to have reliable transportation. By looking at Virginia, many highways are four laned statewide so pretty much anywhere you go in the state, theres no place that is seriously economicly depressed along its major arterials. That is fairness to bring economic oppurtunity for the all residents living in urban and rural areas.
#60
Posted 21 September 2005 - 11:59 AM
Jerseyman4, on Sep 21 2005, 10:45 AM, said:
Yes, exactly. I don't think we should underestimate the economic impact of our rural neighbors in Eastern NC. Depriving outlying areas of transportation resources not only decreases their economic viability but also stymies potential arteries of transportation INTO Raleigh, further depressing our own economic flow.
There must also be some recognition of the reality that a certain percentage of our urban populations will be drawn to more rural areas over time, due to cheaper land. Whatever you think of suburban sprawl, thousands of people choose to live in these areas because they provide an opportunity for investment in land and property that would otherwise be unavailable in more urban areas. This process of diffusion into more rural areas also helps keep urban real estate prices somewhat in check. If everyone remained in the cities, there would be fewer available units of real estate which would drive the prices up even more which affects those of us who DO want to live in the cities.
I think providing sufficient funding for transportation projects outside of Raleigh helps to keep this in check, while lifting the economic prosperity of the state overall.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













