Little Sugar Creek Greenway
#1
Posted 20 January 2005 - 01:59 PM
#2
Posted 25 January 2005 - 09:20 PM
EDIT: crap, well I am having problems posting the images.
Here is a link to a slideshow of them however.
http://pics.livejour...allery/00004ad7
#3
Posted 25 January 2005 - 10:37 PM
#4
Posted 26 January 2005 - 03:02 PM
#5
Posted 14 February 2005 - 11:58 AM
Your thought?
#6
Posted 14 February 2005 - 12:12 PM
cw52808, on Feb 14 2005, 11:58 AM, said:
Your thought?
#7
Posted 14 February 2005 - 12:54 PM
While an observation tower is always a tourist attraction, they are getting a bit commonplace. Something more unique would be preferable like a giant ferris wheel such as the Millenium Wheel?? in London or the Prodder in Vienna. Even better would be something completely unique yet inviting......i wish i was more creative.....
The other thing is that Charlotte isn't a city in a particularly beautiful setting. There are no soaring mountains, bays, rivers, etc.... Trees are nice, but somewhat dull. Take for example the tower in San Antonio....it's a nice city, but I can't imagine being charmed seeing it from a tower, especially if I had to pay to climb it. There is a serious need to fill in surface parking lots, create greenways, move industrial warehouses away from the center city, and create disting memorable neighborhoods that can be differentiated from up high before we invite the whole world to come see us from 1,000 feet up.
Edited by atlrvr, 14 February 2005 - 12:55 PM.
#8
Posted 14 February 2005 - 01:51 PM
#9
Posted 14 February 2005 - 02:19 PM
#10
Posted 14 February 2005 - 02:44 PM
On clear days you can see the mountains off to the distance, Crowders & Kings Mountains just to the south of Charlotte, and of course the lake and river system.
I said before the building of the new arena downtown would do very little for tourism and now that people are seeing the prices that it will take to go to a game there I, like many, predict this will be a failure. The rich will come, be wined and dined in their skyboxes and go home. Don't expect great throngs of new life to appear because of the appeal of the NBA as it appeals to very few people.
If instead the city had spent the $300M+ to build something like the London Eye it would done a great deal more for downtown revitalization than the arena ever will.
#11
Posted 14 February 2005 - 03:10 PM
I agree with monsoon, we need something (other than a shiney new expensive arena) to bring people from around the world. DT charlotte has very few tourist.
#12
Posted 14 February 2005 - 03:53 PM
If you were to free Sugar Creek from it's paved over grave, deepen the channel and create a system of locks further to the south, you could create something very similar to what San Antonio has with the Riverwalk where Midtown and Downtown meet.
It would take a bit of money, but the economic gains in investment would be HUGE.
#13
Posted 14 February 2005 - 04:21 PM
rockhilljames, on Feb 14 2005, 03:53 PM, said:
If you were to free Sugar Creek from it's paved over grave, deepen the channel and create a system of locks further to the south, you could create something very similar to what San Antonio has with the Riverwalk where Midtown and Downtown meet.
It would take a bit of money, but the economic gains in investment would be HUGE.
I thought I read in some previous versions of the greenway plans (that go back decades) that this had been considered, but never got off the ground due to engineering roadblocks. I just hope that as development sprouts up along the 'new' greenway that setbacks are far enough to accommodate expansion of the waterway so a true riverfront district may still be a possibility in the future. I'd hate to see the idea ruled out forever because someone put up a really expensive building too close to the Sugar Creek Greenway. It would be the ideal setting for a stroll district, or even a nice recreation area like Great Falls Md./Va. along the C&O Canal (some parts of the canal are narrow enough to jump from one side to the other, and some parts resemble a rapid river).
#14
Posted 14 February 2005 - 04:37 PM
atlrvr, on Feb 14 2005, 12:54 PM, said:
While an observation tower is always a tourist attraction, they are getting a bit commonplace. Something more unique would be preferable like a giant ferris wheel such as the Millenium Wheel?? in London or the Prodder in Vienna. Even better would be something completely unique yet inviting......i wish i was more creative.....
The other thing is that Charlotte isn't a city in a particularly beautiful setting. There are no soaring mountains, bays, rivers, etc.... Trees are nice, but somewhat dull. Take for example the tower in San Antonio....it's a nice city, but I can't imagine being charmed seeing it from a tower, especially if I had to pay to climb it. There is a serious need to fill in surface parking lots, create greenways, move industrial warehouses away from the center city, and create disting memorable neighborhoods that can be differentiated from up high before we invite the whole world to come see us from 1,000 feet up.
I can remember Mayor Belk in the early 70s talking about turning the creek that runs by CPCC into a river park modeled after San Antonio. It was voted down. He had some great ideas. I had a chance to ride the Millenium wheel last summer as well. It was great but each car carries over 20 people and it continuously runs. There are also about 50 cars on it as well. I paid around $36.00 for my wife and me to ride. Can you imagine how much money could be made. But, where would we get the people? It would be a good idea to have something like it on a smaller basis. I wa rather disapointed in Stockholm with the view fro the tower in Stockholm. Stockholm is a harbor city but there aren't any mountains close by and the city isn't exactly like Hong Kong or New York. Nevertheless, there is still something fascinating about being high up and looking down. Kids love it.
#15
Posted 14 February 2005 - 08:23 PM
cw52808, on Feb 14 2005, 11:58 AM, said:
Your thought?
An observation tower might be good eventually, but i don't see how in the world that would bring tourists, especially not from transfer passengers at the airport. Don't forget that people flying through CLT already have a killer view of the skyline from downtown and they can see the skyline from the air as they take off and land.
#16
Posted 14 February 2005 - 08:53 PM
On that note, building a fake river along the Sugar Creek Greenway would be an environmental disaster. The greenway IS being built for the public enjoyment, and possible real estate stimulous, but also for a whole host of other important reasons. The greenway and creek naturalization process is improving water quality, managing stormwater, and restoring damaged ecosystems. Deepening the channel and creating a false river is about the least responsible thing to do from a sustainabliltiy standpoint.
#17
Posted 14 February 2005 - 10:40 PM
#1: The average ticket price will be $30...that means that 9,000 of those tickets will be less than $30.
#2: The NBA games only take up half of the events schedule at the arena...other nights will be filled with things that are much more afforadable than the NBA...such as the AFL...and Checkers games (where lots of tickets will be cheaper than a movie!)
#3: You really think that 3 million people are going to ride a ferris wheel in downtown Charlotte every year????? Do 3 million even ride the London Eye in a year?
#18
Posted 15 February 2005 - 01:07 AM
#19
Posted 15 February 2005 - 01:38 AM
To be slightly off topic, I wish Meck. Co. Park & Rec would stop paving every greenway trail that is built (incuding the Little Sugar Creak greenway). Way to cater to the running community.
#20
Posted 15 February 2005 - 07:54 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












