Hampton Roads Transportation
#1361
Posted 27 August 2010 - 08:04 PM
The real question is how the gov of this state, and for that matter, country managed to convince us for so long that they just didn't know or just can't afford to take care of the Hampton Roads area!
Let's go people! The eyes! Let's open them por favor!!!
#1362
Posted 05 November 2010 - 05:40 PM
Hampton Roads Crossings' concept would widen the HRBT from two lanes to four in each direction and improve the Monitor-Merrimac Memorial Bridge-Tunnel and the James River Bridge for $3.5 billion to $4.5 billion.
The proposal would be funded by tolls - $4 to $6 on all three crossings. A source close to the project said the toll range is a worst-case scenario.
#1363
Posted 15 November 2010 - 09:26 PM
#1364
Posted 16 November 2010 - 08:57 PM
#1365
Posted 26 November 2010 - 03:34 PM
Quote
Incoming House Republicans may trim or cut funding for all the high-speed projects in the U.S.
Rep. John Mica, R-Fla., ranking GOP member of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee and in line to head it, said high-speed trains are a good idea, but he doesn't agree with the projects selected by the Transportation Department for funding, according to an Associated Press article.
Mica said in the article that he thought that the Northeast is probably the only region in the U.S. with a population density great enough to financially support a high-speed rail network.
Mica said the administration squandered the $8 billion allocated for high-speed rail projects.
He said the money has been given to dozens of projects that were marginal at best to spend on slow-speed trains to nowhere, the AP reported.
Ray Taylor of Future of Hampton Roads Inc., an advocate of passenger rail for Hampton Roads, said Mica's remarks introduce some realism into the national project and will reduce the hype and energy that has swept the nation.
"This, in turn, could reduce the new level of attention that has developed here in Hampton Roads on the subject of high-speed rail over the past months since the Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization's historic resolution on the subject late last year," said Taylor, referring to the endorsement of a high-speed rail route along Route 460 from Norfolk with enhancements for passenger rail on the Peninsula along Interstate 64....
Can't say I didn't see this one coming...
#1366
Posted 27 November 2010 - 05:57 AM
#1367
Posted 27 November 2010 - 12:56 PM
#1368
Posted 30 November 2010 - 01:10 PM
Quote
The second meeting will be held Wednesday at Hampton Roads Transit, 1500 Monticello Ave. in Norfolk.
The agency is holding the meetings in partnership with the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation and the Williamsburg Area Transit Authority.
http://hamptonroads....comment-1029035

Commuter rail looks like LRT with a diesel engine instead of electric:

Street cars look like single car trains:

High speed ferry:

Bus rapid transit (hopefully not in Virginia Beach)

And of course Light Rail:
Edited by ronsmytheiii, 30 November 2010 - 01:16 PM.
#1369
Posted 07 December 2010 - 03:58 PM
#1370
Posted 07 December 2010 - 10:03 PM
rusthebuss, on 07 December 2010 - 03:58 PM, said:
I agree. Especially on the Chesapeake Bay Bridge, nobody would go that way. You can't impose tolls this high on the only way of moving in and out of the region by land. There needs to be alternate (RAIL) ways of moving in and out of the region in place before tolls upward of $3 can be put in place.
#1371
Posted 07 December 2010 - 10:16 PM
VBIllini13, on 07 December 2010 - 10:03 PM, said:
#1372
Posted 08 December 2010 - 08:04 AM
Does anyone else see this possible reality as a way of encouraging localism: more people living closer to where they actually work?
It seems like all these tolls will curb the 21st century tendency to sprawl and keep more residents living in higher densities.
On the flip side, these tolls will create an economic drain on our region, with millions each year going into private hands mostly like overseas. This is not sustainable.
Which will have the greater effect on our economy; the pro's of localism or the con's of a severe economic leak?
#1373
Posted 20 December 2010 - 11:18 AM
Quote
Quote
http://hamptonroads....chmond?cid=ltst
#1374
Posted 04 January 2011 - 02:53 PM
ronsmytheiii, on 20 December 2010 - 11:18 AM, said:
then we need to call our representatives and show them that investment in mass transportation is the only one the truly creates wealth for our state. highway construction will ALWAYS lead to the need for more highway construction and will drain the wealth of our region and state by forcing the expenditure of money on oil-related (oil, gasoline, asphalt, etc.) products: all of which leave the state. mass transit money stays in our region and allows users to keep more of their money.
#1375
Posted 20 July 2011 - 01:19 PM
http://www.wvec.com/...-125901753.html
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













