superNOVA, on Mar 29 2005, 12:23 AM, said:
Why am I not surpirsed that you would buy into that...
If that is the case, why is production capability within the US still gowing? Why is production capacity in the US still growing? Yes, there are some losses, but they are typically quickly offset. Will manufacturing last forever. no, but there will always still be a need for some. Farms are still around - and people like you doomed them in 1900.
If you take your arguments and apply them to services the situation looks even worse...
Dell moving thousands of jobs to India. Citibank cutting around 120,000 jobs (you know those rich bankers, accountants, and traders) because of a merger. You are really showing ignorance of the economy and the state of the economy. The US is not falling off the edge of the world any time soon, and last I checked we still are (and will be for a while) the world leader in production and more importantly productivity.
But, this is even better for Grand Rapids. It is only one of two cities in the nation that boasts of having a market leader (definied top 10) in all of the federally outlined economic markets. Guess the only other city with a more diverse economy.
New York. So no, Grand Rapids is far from being a purely production based town. It is actually one of the most diverse economic regions in the world. Furthermore, the lack of downtown space could also be explained by the four distinct downtown areas within the metro. If they were all combined within the current geographical area of downtown Grand Rapids there would be almost twice the amount of development.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Supernova, do not be one blinded by a false sense of superiority, whether it be in regards to yourself or the nation in which you reside. I think that a superiority complex can create cognitive dissonance and denial in regards to facing reality. Look, all one has to do is go to the Bureau of Labor Statistics and see were the largest numerical increases in employment will be. Wait...I will do it for you by presenting a synopsis of their findings.
#Registered nurses (Associate degree)
#Postsecondary teachers (Doctoral degree)
#Retail salespersons (Short-term on-the-job training)
#Customer service representatives ( Moderate-term on-the-job training)
#Combined food preparation and serving
workers, including fast food (Short-term on-the-job training)
#Cashiers, except gaming (Short-term on-the-job training)
#Janitors and cleaners, except maids
and housekeeping cleaners (Short-term on-the-job training)
#General and operations managers (Bachelor's or higher degree, plus work experience)
#Waiters and waitresses (Short-term on-the-job training)
#Nursing aides, orderlies, and
attendants ( Short-term on-the-job training )
REALITY
This is where the vast majority of our nation’s job growth will be in the next 10 years. Now, there are high-tech occupations which represent some of the fastest growing job opportunities in the nation, but the caveat to that is that a fast growing occupation can provide relatively few numerical increases in jobs relative to the above mentioned. Moreover, many IT and Engineering jobs that represent high growth occupations do not take into consideration of the current trends of off shoring these jobs. The type of Jobs that created Americas large middle class is rapidly dwindling being replaced by low pay service jobs, for those with no college education. Moreover, the economy is only demanding that 26% of the labor pool need a funtional college degree, which means that over 70% of the jobs demanded by the economy do not require college. It is those jobs that provided good pay with little education that will fade away.
The decline of the American economy is a lagging indicator of events shaping globally. The truth of the matter is that the USA is losing what is known as “Comparative Advantage” (look it up if you don’t remember the concept from your economics minor). With the growth of China and India, their economies have intellectual capital and cheap labor to produce a Comparative advantage in goods produced over that of the USA.
If the global market for labor was free to flow fluidly, the American worker wages and salaries would be bid down in competition with cheaper sources of labor. It does not take a rocket scientist to understand the laws of supply and demand under a free market. If the supply of commodity is increased relative to demand, the value of what is being supplied is reduced. What free trade and the Rise of third word economies has done is that it is increased the supply of labor that will compete to produce American corporate goods and services. That increased supply available to American corporations will reduce the value of the American worker, who no longer have leverage of supply dynamics, born from an isolated labor pool (the USA), keeping wages artificially high. Large untapped supplies of cheap labor will pull American wages down in a free market for labor which is manifesting under NAFTA and Globalization.
What you are practicing is not economics...its “hop-e-nomics”.
Edited by Freddy C, 29 March 2005 - 09:59 AM.