Charlotte Center City Streetcar Network Trade, Elizabeth, Central, Beatties Ford, and downtown extensions
#1
Posted 20 August 2003 - 05:52 PM
#2
Posted 20 August 2003 - 07:25 PM
#4 Guest_donaltopablo_*
Posted 20 August 2003 - 08:09 PM
#5
Posted 26 July 2004 - 03:28 PM
#6
Posted 10 December 2004 - 04:03 PM
#7
Posted 28 December 2004 - 09:09 AM
Portland Streetcar runs in mixed traffic, just like a bus. all you tend to lose is some parking near stops (can't even remember if Central Blvd has on street parking)
#8
Posted 16 May 2005 - 07:44 AM
This weekends cbj had an interesting update on the streetcar line.
it will no longer be planned to do the simple hawthorne-central route, due to the freight train tracks. Now it will cut right to run next to independence, and then left on pecan and then right on central.
Although it is a bit of ashame for the western part of central, which needs more revitalization, it is probably good that there will be more stops around the p-m biz district other than busy central.
I think the "loop" around there is complete redundant and unnecessary, though. People can walk 2 blocks!!! The only reason i would think it is okay if it is needed to improve logistics when it is the end of the line. I think it will be tricky to reverse direction on central for the decade or so it is the end of the line.
#9
Posted 16 May 2005 - 09:25 AM
On another note... http://www.charlotte...ws/11651272.htm
This makes me believe that Independence will get light rail. The Transit Commission all represents all the towns and Charlotte, but each only have one vote plus one vote from the County Commission, even though the population of Charlotte is greater than all the towns, we'd still get one vote, Mint Hill and Matthews will be eager to vote for light rail with probably other towns teaming up votes like Pineville to vote for light rail on Independence. I personally don't like the set up of the Transit Commission, it's a compromise of an independent Transit Authority and the Charlotte City Council. It prevents Charlotte from making all the transit decisions and a Transit Authority that would have Charlotte appointing the majority of its member. But the Transit Commission is nothing but an advisory board for CATS. Charlotte City Council must approve all contracts as CATS is a Charlotte identity. The Transit Commission suppose to review itself anyways as part of the plan to see if it should evolve into a true Transit Authority.
#10
Posted 16 May 2005 - 09:30 AM
#11
Posted 16 May 2005 - 10:50 AM
S&Z, i understand your concern about the independence connection on the streetcar, but i believe that this will be implemented in a way to avoid the problems you are worried about.
Here is the sat of the area
http://maps.google.com/maps?q=charlotte&ll...07703&t=k&hl=en
They are not talking about being in independence, but rather just outside the row on the patchwork of side streets between 'party time' and the freeway. It could solve many problems if they create a straight grid-like connector street between hawthorne, lamar and pecan. This is perfectly in keeping with streetcar's purpose of enhancing the urban fabric.
i think the reason for taking that route, (as is seen well in the sat image) is that there is already a grade separation valley for the tracks, so a simple short-span bridge creates the grade separation, which would be impossible and complex if done on central (with either trains or street crossing overhead).
Just correcting the street network there will go a long way to improving connectivity, as right now, the only connector between hawthorne and the p-m biz district is central ave.
#12
Posted 16 May 2005 - 11:04 AM
I am surprised it hasn't come up yet to extend street car further as east/southeast's rail transit. They could continue the line from eastland to continue in the same direction to follow lawyers road to "downtown" mint hill and then cut south to connect mint hill to matthew on 51 or something.
i just don't get the obsession with independence. it will be hugely expensive to put rail transit on independence. Streetcar could be effective and cheaper, and simply be extended in phases until it reaches the towns. A route like Lawyers will put it in the heart of residential east charlotte, and avoid the mess of independence, which can continue to be bus transit as it is widened/converted over time.
No additional rights of way, no additional facilities, no major engineering, no stations, but two transit corridors.
#13
Posted 16 May 2005 - 11:26 AM
I actually think that Charlotte should focus on creating a network of streetcars inside within the area bound by Idlewild, Fairview, Tyvola, Billy Graham, I-85, Sugar Creek, Shamrock, and Sharon Amity.
#14
Posted 16 May 2005 - 11:35 AM
but i think another streetcar line that would be good would be another spur from the eliz ave streetcar, going south on hawthorne, then out through providence business district and then turning down providence (ha ha) to either wendover or sharon lakes, and then down sharon to south park.
Basically, the theory is that the main transit corridors go SE, SW, W, N, and NE and go from county border to center city. The streetcars, then would go to major activity centers within 5 mi of center city between the other corridors (ie. Southpark, Eastland, and Beatties Ford/85).
(my preference would still be that the "long" SE route would be rail on some non-independence corridor.)
#15
Posted 16 May 2005 - 11:57 AM
dubone, on May 16 2005, 01:35 PM, said:
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
That would be the line that makes most sense to me (the Sharon Amity to Sharon Rd. as mentioned)
Also, I believe a line along Morehead from Wilkinson to Kenilworth down Kenilworth/Park to Tyvola up to SP as well.
Also, I think The Plaza, to 30th, to Statesville, to LaSalle, to Beatties Ford would be a good cross town to join lots of lines that would stimulate some economic development.
#16
Posted 16 May 2005 - 12:16 PM
a streetcar circuit that connects the spokes would be good, and much more useful to feeding the other lines than the center city streetcar loop.
I guess it is clear that from my view, there are many good options for streetcars to fill the holes in the transit plan. the key will be to getting/keeping costs low, as it should never be as as expensive as lightrail, etc. (perhaps another aspect to lower cost would be diesel streetcars. that way all they need to do is embed tracks in the road.).
The inner 5 mile radius is only going to grow more dense, especially on the thoroughfares. By setting a pattern for lower cost streetcars to overtake crowded bus routes, a streetcar network can be built over time, potentially with developers contributing to parts, just as they do with roads. ie, if you want your high density development on kenilworth, extend the tracks the extra mile, etc. That would put us back on the pattern of early last century.
#17
Posted 16 May 2005 - 12:24 PM
#18
Posted 30 May 2005 - 10:06 AM
One would be the Central/Beatties Ford line that had been announced.
They got rid of the circular line in Uptown and replace it with 2 shorter point-point lines.
One would go from 10th and Church west to Graham, Graham south to Trade, Trade east to McDowell (sharing the Trade track with the other line), south on McDowell to Stonewall/Kenilworth, southest on Kenilworth to CMC where it would loop around Pierce and come back along Scott.
The other would start on Cedar (back in the vacant 3rd Ward land south of Morehead) then head up to Trade St. in Gateway Village, and take the Trade tracks east of to McDowell, then north on McDowell, east on 10th, and finally north on Siegle up to The Plaza where it would turn around.
I love these lines (though the Kenilworth should be extended all the way down Park to Fairview and thne to SP) They aren't planned to be built until the entire 1st line is built from Eastland to 85.
#19
Posted 30 May 2005 - 10:44 AM
#20
Posted 30 May 2005 - 11:23 AM
Streetcar Map

Help












