Posted 21 June 2005 - 11:53 PM
The plan is great, but they seem to be having the same funding problems as Dallas. The timetable is much longer than the Dallas plan, which hopes to have the park, parkway and bridges all open by 2010.
The Dallas and Fort Worth plans are hardly comparable though everyone wants to compare them. The Fort Worth plan would be only one part of the Dallas plan, which is absolutely a huge, huge swath of land. The park itself could swallow Central Park twice. It also includes rezoning and redevelopment of several shore areas, entry and access ways to the Great Trinity Forest as well as tourism to it and incredible flood control. We are talking about zoning similar to the FW plan in places, and extension of the CBD zoning area west to the river. The lakes will be similar in execution to White Rock complete with nature areas, marinas and even amusements like softball and soccer complexes, a white water park, and perhaps even waterparks. One part of Dallas' plan that I never see mentioned anywhere is the Trinity Meander, which is where the original Trinity curves and sways up near the Maket Center area. Water will be channeled through this meander similarly to the Riverwalk in SA. Considering its the entryway to Turtle Creek expect nothing but upscale. Both plans are very similar down to requiring significant zoning change. That area as well as Industrial Blvd just north of Woodall Rodgers, got the change this spring, and the Crows(who own most of the land) are looking for mixed use developers right now. Nothing may happen, but hopefully things do.
As I said, the plans aren't even that comparable. They are as different as the Trinity is when it passes through each city.