<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>UP|The NC Triangle</title>
	<description></description>
	<link>http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/forums.html</link>
	<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 18:59:30 -0500</pubDate>
	<ttl>15</ttl>
	
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Downtown Raleigh living & street activity]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=42879&view=findpost&p=974038]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=42879&view=findpost&p=974038]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<!--quoteo(post=974036:date=May 11 2008, 04&#58;33 PM:name=dmccall)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (dmccall &#064; May 11 2008, 04&#58;33 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=974036"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Well...I think that a PBR at the Raleigh Times is a must-do after this week for out-of-towners <img src="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":)" border="0" alt="smile.gif" /><!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--><br />They are Obama supporters....<br />]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 18:06:17 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>Jones133</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Downtown Raleigh living & street activity]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=42879&view=findpost&p=974036]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=42879&view=findpost&p=974036]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well...I think that a PBR at the Raleigh Times is a must-do after this week for out-of-towners <img src="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":)" border="0" alt="smile.gif" />]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 17:33:58 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>dmccall</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>RDU International Airport</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=32674&view=findpost&p=973943]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=32674&view=findpost&p=973943]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I must say, looking at that flikr picture.. Terminal A IS a very sad sight to see as you fly into RDU.. it just looks soooo drab.. I'l be glad when it gets renovated.. hopefully there will be a lot more windows put in.. and something more exciting to see as you pull up to the gate..]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 10:08:01 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>ERJ170</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>RDU International Airport</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=32674&view=findpost&p=973940]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=32674&view=findpost&p=973940]]></guid>
		<description>You can see a small portion (like the poster said) on the other side of the parking decks in the top right corner.</description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 09:28:02 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>Justin6882</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>RDU International Airport</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=32674&view=findpost&p=973935]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=32674&view=findpost&p=973935]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<!--quoteo(post=973773:date=May 11 2008, 03&#58;34 AM:name=Atlside)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Atlside &#064; May 11 2008, 03&#58;34 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=973773"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Here's an interesting Flickr image of RDU's new Terminal 2 (former American Airlines Terminal C complex)<br /><br />You can see a small portion of it on the other side of the central parking decks.<br /><br /><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3045/2456052526_dbf56c2c44_b.jpg" border="0" class="linked-image" /><!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--><br /><br />Sorry, but this is Terminal A, the old terminal. I can't see any of the new terminal. Any photos out there?]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 08:53:25 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>shirokuma66</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Downtown Raleigh living & street activity]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=42879&view=findpost&p=973902]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=42879&view=findpost&p=973902]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I helped entertain some out of town friends here for some local graduation stuff. It was very hard to find stuff to do that was not associated with eating or a museum during the daytime. I of course know this already, but really wanted to give a good impression of the City. Here was the day and I think it reflects on the current status of street level life...of course there are plenty of other possible plans but anyway.....<br />- Starting from the Sheraton we chose Big Eds for breakfast. I considered Mecca but it could not handle our big group well in my opinion. Also we wanted a "hearty" breakfast and not just a bagel or a scone so that pretty much took the coffee shops off the list for the moment<br />- had an hour to kill before part of the group had to split, so wandered around Artspace for a bit. The public galleries are nice and the building is very cool to look at in the daylight (as opposed to a first friday mostly at night) but at 10 am it had just opened and only one artist was in studio. We did kill the hour and about 5 other people were in there looking around but it was just too early to fully appreciate the place with so few artists open<br />- With the nice weather I wanted to stretch the legs in the form of window shopping. The three gift shops in City Market were not much so we drove to the Farmers Market. It was freakin' packed and made a good impression on my guests but I was a little embarrassed downtown had almost nothing.<br />- after enough of the overwhelming farmers market we did head back downtown at my guests request for [in fact] the quiet. We got coffee at Morning Times and browsed Father and Sons. F&S occupied another hour and doubles as a sort of museum along with it being a store. Several funny books were taken home as souvenirs. <br />- Finally we had to meet someone else coming into town who we knew liked plants, flowers and such. I considered a stroll in Oakwood, plus Pullen Park, and Lake Johnson, but finally decided to drive to the Arboretum. It made a good impression on my visiting friends but secretly I wished downtown proper had more than just Moore Square and the Capital Grounds for outdoorsy strolling. <br />- lunch could have been downtown of course but after having driven away from downtown it was decided Neomonde was quiet and close to the Arboretum. <br /><br />My guests were actually impressed and happy with the day. The weather helped alot. They noted all the construction downtown and I emphasized how things are continuing to evolve and improve for people living and visiting downtown. One guy was a banker and was impressed by our two bank headquarters plus a F500 company all right next to each other. I think if my guests had been cut loose on their own, they would have had a harder time filling up their day...they enjoyed having a tour guide as most family and friends do. Anyway, just wanted to share a story of a day on he street with folks not from here and how it played out and the challenges involved.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 23:55:16 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>Jones133</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Triangle Regional Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=7465&view=findpost&p=973864]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=7465&view=findpost&p=973864]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is really promising for getting TTA LRT off the ground...  NY Times is reporting that mass transit use is UP across the country especially in the West and South, where ridership is up 10-15%!  If there is that much of an increase in our part of the country, we should have little trouble I would hope of passing anything necessary to get LRT up and running.  That further pushes my point that NOW is the time to get this thing off the ground.  In the meantime Raleigh, TTA, Durham and the other cities with bus lines need to beef up their services to accomodate increasing ridership.<br /><br /><a href='http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/10/business/10transit.html'  target="_blank" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker('/outgoing/www_nytimes_com');">http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/10/business/10transit.html</a>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 21:55:16 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>Gard</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Downtown Raleigh living & street activity]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=42879&view=findpost&p=973812]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=42879&view=findpost&p=973812]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The city has done some street work--don't forget the two-way conversion of Martin and Hargett St.  Hargett also received about 4 extra feet of "reclaimed" sidewalk--the first ever street diet in Raleigh I'm told.  Also, with F-St part 2, the city is converting Lenoir and South to two-way operation.  I think there are longer term plans to two-way Jones and Lane as well.  The only pairs remaining would be Blount/Person, Wilmington/Salisbury, and Dawson/McDowell, which will probably remain in their current form.<br /><br /><!--quoteo(post=973245:date=May 8 2008, 08&#58;23 PM:name=phoenixnc)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (phoenixnc &#064; May 8 2008, 08&#58;23 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=973245"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Wait, how will City Plaza be a barrier to pedestrians? It can't be any more than it is now, because construction is blocking everything...<br />I also think it is important that F street goes all the way through to South Street. Are there any plans for the area where the parking lots are in front of Memorial?<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--><br />The city plaza holdup hurts because it won't be done by the fall when the RCC and hotel open.  It sure would have presented a much nicer picture of the city to have that complete (not to mention more hotel space).  Plus the phase 2 of Fayetteville St (to Lenoir) will be complete with an unfinished hole in the middle (plaza), from what I understand.  I would expect there will have to be some pedestrian connections in tact during plaza construction, but it will be a mess--like the phase 1 project was.<br /><br />Sites 2 & 3 in front of the Memorial Auditorium are going to be released in an RFP for developer interest (+ design competition?).  I believe extending Fayetteville St to South St will depend on the the developer's proposal.  It could be another small plaza, or some other public space.  For connectivity purposes, I'd like to see the street extended to South, but we'll just have to wait and see.<br /><br />Back to street activity... I'm hoping that the old Holly's Hallmark store (being redeveloped) and Empire's Mahler Trust (dollar store) bldg renovations will house active uses... Thursday night, F St was pretty dead... we desperately need more residential in the core (RBC=good) plus as many active street retail (5-11pm+ hours) renovations as possible, and I agree more wrapped parking decks.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 16:46:00 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>ChiefJoJo</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>RDU International Airport</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=32674&view=findpost&p=973773]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=32674&view=findpost&p=973773]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here's an interesting Flickr image of RDU's new Terminal 2 (former American Airlines Terminal C complex)<br /><br />You can see a small portion of it on the other side of the central parking decks.<br /><br /><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3045/2456052526_dbf56c2c44_b.jpg" border="0" class="linked-image" />]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 13:34:08 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>Atlside</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Triangle Regional Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=7465&view=findpost&p=973770]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=7465&view=findpost&p=973770]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now I understand why the mock of the TTA rapid rail car had blue and gold stripes.<br /><br /><b>Proposed Regional Rail Vehicle <br />DMU Mock-up Introduced in Dallas, TX <br />September 26-28, 2005</b><br />The new rail car from United Transit Systems (UTS) was on display at the American Public Transportation Association Expo at the Dallas Convention Center. <br /><br />In May 2005, Sojitz Corporation of America President & CEO Jun Matsumoto and Rotem Company Vice Chairman & CEO Soon-Won Chung signed a design agreement with TTA which allowed UTS to begin limited design and engineering on the prototype.<br /><br />TTA had signed a contract to build 14 rapid rail DMUs for its then 28-mile rail 12 stations transit system.<br /><br /><img src="http://www.ridetta.org/Regional_Rail/Overview/images/GN7A0019_000.jpg" border="0" class="linked-image" /><br /><br /><img src="http://www.ridetta.org/Regional_Rail/Overview/images/DSC00045.JPG" border="0" class="linked-image" /><br /><br /><br /><br />]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 13:06:58 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>Atlside</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Triangle traffic thread</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=9058&view=findpost&p=973606]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=9058&view=findpost&p=973606]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<!--quoteo(post=972300:date=May 6 2008, 04&#58;46 PM:name=ncwebguy)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ncwebguy &#064; May 6 2008, 04&#58;46 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=972300"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->It is a shame that "you clogged it, you fix it" doesn't apply to Johnston County.  Instead, the rest of the state pays for their mistakes, and they plow ahead with making the same mistakes over again (more more more!)  It is a good deal for them to not have to raise impact fees or real estate transfer fees when everyone else foots the bill for their 22 new bridges and 10 miles of four land highway.  US 70 was already built to freeway standards from west of Smithfield/Selma to east of 95.  There isn't much industry that way, so the roads built with tax dollars are not to attract jobs but to make Johnston County homes and strip malls more atrractive.<br /><br />Signs for the new bypass are already up and covered on 40.  The "business" designation over the current US 70 to Clayton from I-40, with a temporary blank green piece covering it.  The sad thing is this project drew money from the DOT area that also incudes Wake County.  I-40 from the Wade Ave split to 1/64 had to stay at two lanes each way while Fred Smith, umm I mean Clayton, got a bypass for the uncontrolled growth (Super Wal Mart, other shopping centers) on their old bypass.  All the while sucking life out of the original downtown (slowly improving due to arts while the swelling population barely notices) built on the train tracks that are still maintained.<br /><br />I-40 will still be two lanes each way down there (for now), so the congestion will be somewhat relieved and shifted.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--><br /><br /><br />Please note that the Clayton bypass has more to do with the entire US 70 corridor east of Raleigh than it does with Johnston County growth (http://www.ncdot.org/doh/preconstruct/tpb/SHC/studies/US70/). I started school at NC State in 1995 and since then, I have been making the long drive to number to visit family.  US 70 is one of the most important corridors in the eastern part of the state and for the sake of regional and statewide mobility, the bypass of Clayton is a necessity.  <br /><br />I do agree that local governments need to take better steps to manage growth.  However, the growth that we have had in not just Wake County, but Johnston, DUrham, Orange, Franklin, and other surround counties are partially responsible for the Triangle being what it is....still one of the best places to live.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 17:45:27 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>Otto</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Downtown Raleigh living & street activity]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=42879&view=findpost&p=973514]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=42879&view=findpost&p=973514]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/Raleigh-s-Fayetteville-St-t10368.html&st=40&p=229586#entry229586" target="_blank">This post</a> shows what F Street looked like during the mall to street conversion.  The plans for City Plaza will involve a similar amout of work, with sidewalks being as narrow as they can get away with, probably for months.  It is better than the solid wall created by the underground parking deck construction fence, but barely.  It doesn't scream "hey, this is an interesting place to walk around" right when a lot of new visitors will be coming to the city's core for the first time.<br /><br />Not doing the work now was a lost opportuinty if everyone was on the same page.  Doing the work *now* would have provided a nice connection from the  <a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/Raleigh-Marriott-City-Cen-t17221.html&st=340&start=340" target="_blank">hotel</a> and <a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/Raleigh-Convention-Center-t30023.html&st=240&start=240" target="_blank">convention center</a> to the rest of F Street.   And F Street could have connected to at least Lenoir Street, if not South in front of the performing arts complex.  I hope the work is quick and not too disruptive, but converting the plaza into a street plus programmable public space is not going to be finished in a couple of weeks.<br /><br />A lot of events take advantage of the warm weather with everyone wanting to get out.  The military appreciation, beer festival, wine tasting, and various fundraising runs/walks all seem to schedule during the mid April to mid May window.    I think (hope) the activity will die down after next weekend's Artsplosure, since Downtown Raleigh Live only closes down Martin from Blount to Person.  The city did put in new street signs, but put them on the signal *poles*, not across the intersection itself.  They are larger than the old signs, have rounded corners and a nice white border.  But they are not as big as the cross streets' signs on Capitol.<br /><br />The only streets downtown that get any attention are Dawson, McDowell, and now Fayetville Street.  Everythign else gets the shaft to keep North Raleigh beautiful.  I hope McDowell/Cabarrus/Salisbury get improved once Convention Center construction starts wrapping up, but the rest of downtown, especially the Edenton/Hillsborough-New Bern/Morgan corridors are abused by a lot of use even though they were repaved a few years ago.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 13:49:22 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>ncwebguy</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>RBC Plaza</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=28274&view=findpost&p=973503]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=28274&view=findpost&p=973503]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The smaller non-RBC Centura branch retail spaces have been hidden behind the construction fence, and I've never seen a "(insert business here) coming soon/now hiring" signs.  When is the building officially opening?  Last I heard, it should be in the next six months (Nov 2008), but I hope discussions on leasing the space should be pretty far along by now.  The same could be asked of the Convention Center Marriott, since it is opening in 2-3 months.  It would be nice to avoid the repeat of Progress Energy II where the spaces sat empty for a while after the offices in the building were occupied.  It would be nice if Martin/Wilmington follows in the footsteps of Harget/Wilmington, with Mecca providing the Morning Times/Times Bar "anchor" presence and other businesses filling in around it.  If Dunkin Donuts/Baskin-Robbins opened here and in 222 Glenwood, that would say a lot about their confidence in downtown. <br /><br />The RBC Plaza website doesn't have anything other than the <a href='http://webcam.rbcplaza.com/'  target="_blank" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker('/outgoing/webcam_rbcplaza_com');">webcam</a>.<br /><br />If the crown is downtown, they might be lifting it up this weekend?  The crane has been idle since the "steeple" has been finished... I might need to get my "touching" in.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 13:14:22 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>ncwebguy</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Hinsdale Row</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=44387&view=findpost&p=973490]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=44387&view=findpost&p=973490]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cityspace has a blog, that I just stumbled across, for this project: <a href='http://cityspacedevelopment.blogspot.com/'  target="_blank" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker('/outgoing/cityspacedevelopment_blogspot_com');">http://cityspacedevelopment.blogspot.com/</a>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 12:26:33 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>miamiblue</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Downtown Raleigh living & street activity]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=42879&view=findpost&p=973386]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=42879&view=findpost&p=973386]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More foot traffic and dining & retail options help a good deal.   Of course what really helps is more residential.  (And not just luxury condos for the rich!)<br />  <br />Now I just wish the city would concentrate on infrastructure some.  People often still think of downtown as dirty and full of potholes...and in many cases they're right.    Compared to North Raleigh, the condition of downtown's streets is dismal!   <img src="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/style_emoticons/default/mad.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":angry:" border="0" alt="mad.gif" />   (One coworker told me it wasn't parking keeping her from downtown...it was fear of ruining her car's suspension.)   <br />Not to mention out-of-date stoplight intersections, broken/bent/missing street signs, etc.  (The suburbs get these great large street signs that hang from the stoplights now so that people can tell where they're going...but downtown has hardly any.)  It's like the city's traffic department doesn't even know downtown exists.<br />And I like the street fairs, parades, etc.  But I think they really need to slow down and think the scheduling some.  About 2-3 weeks ago I think, there was like three different events downtown closing streets.  Getting through the area was impossible!  Do they think that's going to help downtown's image?  As the place "nobody can drive in on a Saturday"?   I don't think so....they need to not just automatically approve anyone who simply requests to close down a street.  Let's think it through first, folks.<br /><br />I think businesses are mostly doing their part...particularly the Alliance...in trying to bring life downtown.  It's time the city steps up a bit.  Fayetteville Street revitalization was great...but don't stop there!<br /> <img src="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=";)" border="0" alt="wink.gif" />]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 07:58:56 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>RaleighRob</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Hills East project</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=19341&view=findpost&p=973333]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=19341&view=findpost&p=973333]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would have to agree that Kane has done an excellent job with NH and frankly if it wasn't for what he did there, this area would probably still look ratty.  This area has been completely revitalized thanks to him.  Now if the city would use NH as a model for what they expect from developers all over town...]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 23:06:29 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>Gard</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Downtown Raleigh living & street activity]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=42879&view=findpost&p=973245]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=42879&view=findpost&p=973245]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wait, how will City Plaza be a barrier to pedestrians? It can't be any more than it is now, because construction is blocking everything...<br />I also think it is important that F street goes all the way through to South Street. Are there any plans for the area where the parking lots are in front of Memorial?<br /><br />I have also seen an increase in people downtown. Of course there is a long way still to go, but it is MUCH better than only 5 years ago. Once all of the major projects get wrapped up, I would like to see more infill along the streets, establishing more street level retail, especially stores. Of course restaurants would be nice, but shopping should be a major attraction as well. A good example is Charleston, SC. Although the city is much smaller and has a much different history, they have established great shopping areas with chains as well as boutiques that are pedestrian friendly and almost uninterrupted. The more retail that fronts the streets, the better. Parking decks should not be allowed to front streets because they inhibit easy walking and interrupt the flow of the street. I like the way the city is going and I am pretty happy. No if we could just get rid of those dang parking lots...]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 19:23:51 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>phoenixnc</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Hills East project</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=19341&view=findpost&p=973241]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=19341&view=findpost&p=973241]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like it... except for that surface parking... but whatever, it's better than what was there. Where exactly will the pedestrian bridge be?]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 19:13:02 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>phoenixnc</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>RBC Plaza</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=28274&view=findpost&p=973205]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=28274&view=findpost&p=973205]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw the crown in the street next to the tower off of F-street and hopped the fence and touched it before they put it up.<br /><br />Now when I point at the building I can say I did that. <img src="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":)" border="0" alt="smile.gif" />]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 17:40:31 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>CliffyB</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>How should we pay for growth?</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=23731&view=findpost&p=973153]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=23731&view=findpost&p=973153]]></guid>
		<description>^Seriously....the difference between me say, probalby never having to pay for growth(transfer fee) versus having to pay for it every year(property taxes), is pretty much a no-brainer.....it borders on complete idiocy these people voting it down....</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 15:46:34 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>Jones133</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Downtown Raleigh living & street activity]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=42879&view=findpost&p=973152]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=42879&view=findpost&p=973152]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is hard to belive, but Fayetville Street was just getting the finishing touches a short two years ago.  At that time, there was *no* activity in that corridor day or night.  And the rest of downtown didn't have much going on either, outside City Market (mostly during First Fridays, Downtown Raleigh Live, and other events), the warehouse district near Morgan/West/Hargett, and Glenwood South (though not to the extent it is today).  People used to come into downtown on Thursdays for Alive After Five and then go elsewhere.  Now there is no AA5 (or convention center), but people still come and *stay*.<br /><br />Some of the people are coming from new residences (the bikes at/around Times Bar is encouraging), but many are driving a little further, passing on an hour wait at the Olive Garden to try something different downtown -- Big Easy, Yancy's, Soma, Poole's, Dos Taquitos Centro, Mint, etc.  I hope the high gas prices don't change people's habits, as mass transit after the afternoon work rush is still not good enough to make downtown a viable 18 hour city yet.<br /><br />Also, the incomplete City Plaza (which doesn't look close to starting construction) will eventually be a barrier between the performing arts complex/convention center/Mariott and the rest of F Street, but hopefully there will be an acceptable pedestrian connection.<br /><br />I know that Fayetville Street Tavern's decision to open for lunch was based primarily on the increased pedestrian traffic that comes with the warmer weather.  Momentum builds as more people feel safer to walk during their lunch hour while working and/or visiting at night.<br /><br />In the last five years or so, Brier Creek, the North Hills revamp, and Triangle Town Center were the only other clusters of new things opening.  They all draw pretty well, but provide a different experience than downtown offers.  When North Hills opened, it wasn't a ghost town but it was not nearly as popular as it is now.  A combination of positive experiences with enough things to see and do will drive word of mouth buzz.  As long as the current positive, welcoming attitude is maintained, downtown will continue to grow organically and thrive.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 15:46:34 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>ncwebguy</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wake County Public Schools and growth</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=38456&view=findpost&p=973143]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=38456&view=findpost&p=973143]]></guid>
		<description>How about giving the School Board taxing authority?  You know the schools have responsibility and accountability for their portion of the tax money.  Right now they can ask for $200B and say that the schools are overcrowded or performing poorly because of the County Commisioners.  Hmmmm...I think Wake is headed in the wrong direction.  Good luck guys/gals...</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 15:31:24 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>bullcity76</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>How should we pay for growth?</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=23731&view=findpost&p=973139]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=23731&view=findpost&p=973139]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<!--quoteo(post=972695:date=May 7 2008, 04&#58;53 PM:name=ncwebguy)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ncwebguy &#064; May 7 2008, 04&#58;53 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=972695"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->I don't think the general assembly should pull a county's right to vote on a tranfer fee, regardless of it failing in 20 counties so far.  Most of those referendums had no direction for the revenue, so of course they failed.  If they showed those dollars would go to school construction or road improvments or anything specific and needed, it would have done better.  Does anyone know why it failed in Orange County, other than the Home Builder's Association's "stop the home tax" campaign?<br /><br />The sales tax option is also failing for the most part.  It passed in one county and failed in several others, again because there was little to no description of where the generated revenue would go.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--><br /><br />I think Raleigh and Durham are well-positioned to pursue a transfer tax fee.  I know its been completely blown out of the water in several counties but if a plan was presented as well as what will happen if the fee is not implemented.  Raleigh would be an even easier place to sell it...where they are looking at Billions of dollars of school construction with accompanying year-round schools and property tax hikes.  I'm sure people would prefer to pay a Transfer Tax than annually pay increased property taxes.<br /><br />I really think we need to look at how and where we construct schools now.  I'm talking about taller (3/4 Story plus), multiple campuses (sharing athletic facillities that are publicly available where feasible) and with schools within schools.  This at the minimum reduce land costs.  Also reuse of older schools and inner city buildings as magnet or montessori schools is plausible also (i.e. recent Lakewood YMCA and Durham County deal).]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 15:23:33 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>bullcity76</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wake County Public Schools and growth</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=38456&view=findpost&p=973131]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=38456&view=findpost&p=973131]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The N&O's Wake Ed blog has <a href='http://blogs.newsobserver.com/wakeed/index.php?title=pros_and_cons_of_funding_proposal&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1#comments'  target="_blank" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker('/outgoing/blogs_newsobserver_com');">a post on the Board of Education's reaction to the County Commissioners' school construction plan</a>.  The BoE listed the <a href='http://www.newsobserver.com/content/media/2008/5/7/prosandcons.pdf'  target="_blank" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker('/outgoing/www_newsobserver_com');">pros and cons</a> of the proposal, and it is hard to tell if they are on board or not.  If they need a bond referendum in 2009 as they have claimed in the past, they might sign on.  But it is good to see people looking to get specifics in writing and are aware of potential pitfalls.  They worded them more kindly than I did above, especially the politicizing of school sites and construction (which I think is another knock *against* all BoE seats being at-large) and the potential for being stuck with mistakes made by Commissioners who later punt the problem back to the school board.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 15:13:50 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>ncwebguy</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Downtown Raleigh living & street activity]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=42879&view=findpost&p=973108]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=42879&view=findpost&p=973108]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I feel the reason for the rise in activity is the rise in options people have compared to this time last year. the warmer weather is a big factor also.<br /><br />Is it safe to say that downtown has the most new openings of restaurants/bars then anywhere else in Raleigh over the past year? 2 years? <br /><br />Downtown is dynamic and as new places are opening they are attracting more people that keep coming back. When they come back they notice all the other places and give them a try. Loyal customers keep coming back to the places they like while others have a long list of places to go to.<br /><br />I also think the nightlife is continuing to take off in all areas of downtown.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 14:20:28 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>cophead567</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Downtown Raleigh living & street activity]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=42879&view=findpost&p=973100]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=42879&view=findpost&p=973100]]></guid>
		<description>Morning Times has been the key spot imo. There are often a dozen or more people sitting outside there on a weekend morning, usually 20 and 30 somethings biking or walking in from their downtown apartment or house. It attracts locals more than depending on drive in customers. But its all on the uptick. I ate lunch at Crema one Saturday and probably 10 other people came in the 30 minutes I was there. Big Easy also pulls well at all times of day every day. The Mint is also adding to foot traffic since it opened. On a nice day there are many places with outdoor seating...Raleigh/morning Times, Riveria, FST, Crema, Big Easy, Yanceys...I have definitely noticed that this summer is sahping up to be the best yet...the magic 2008 we have been talkin up for the last 3 or 4 years.</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 13:59:04 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>Jones133</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>RBC Plaza</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=28274&view=findpost&p=973081]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=28274&view=findpost&p=973081]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The lobby floor plan shows a huge retail space along Fayetteville St. (13,560 sf) - possibly the bank's branch?, the office entrance lobby on the corner of Martin St. - probably similar to the Capital Bank Building, and then two small retail spaces along Martin (1,780 sf and 2,375 sf) with the larger on the corner with Wilmington St.   The residential lobby is between these two.  Wilmington St. will have two loading docks and the entrance to the parking deck.<br /><br />As far as what tenants will fill these spaces, I have no idea.  I bet either coffee shops or a deli to take advantage of the built in customer base from the office component of the building.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 13:12:21 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>jumboman</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Downtown Raleigh living & street activity]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=42879&view=findpost&p=973061]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=42879&view=findpost&p=973061]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I'm reviving this topic and adding the general feel and activity downtown...<br /><br />Maybe it's just the nice weather and some of the recent events like St Patty's Day, 1st Fridays and the Beer Fest, but I have gotten a sense that the foot traffic has really jumped recently, and even on the weekends there are more people in the center city (F-St area) than I can ever recall seeing before in my lifetime.  Particularly, the area around Hargett and Wilmington (Empire's corner?) where Raleigh/Morning Times have firmly established a thriving business at all hours of the day and night.  If there was a good way to count people on the streets, I'd say it's up substantially (20-30%) over last year at this time.<br /><br />We've also seen an increasing number of establishments open on the weekends for the first time in years... ie, Mecca, which has been serving food on Martin St since the 1930s is now open on Saturdays for brunch for the first time in decades (IIRC).  Sosta is now open in Saturdays, along with many of the coffee shops.  I feel like some of this is due to some added residential (Palladium/Hudson), but also people driving and biking in from adjoining neighborhoods, as well as a handful of visitors from out of town.  Of course, adding the next wave of condos (West, 222, Bloomsbury, RBC), the RCC, and city plaza/F-St extension will all add even more to the activity this fall.<br /><br />Anyway, I'd like to get other's opinions... have you noticed a difference?]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 12:22:28 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>ChiefJoJo</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>RBC Plaza</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=28274&view=findpost&p=973051]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=28274&view=findpost&p=973051]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, we are constantly talking about the crown, topping out, and the skyline impact... what about the street retail?<br /><br />Other than a prominent RBC bank branch (on the Martin/Fayetteville St corner, I presume), does anyone know what is planned for the retail space?]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 12:06:52 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>ChiefJoJo</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>North Hills East project</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=19341&view=findpost&p=973049]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=19341&view=findpost&p=973049]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kane apparently obtained funding for the <a href='http://www.newsobserver.com/business/nc/story/1065019.html'  target="_blank" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker('/outgoing/www_newsobserver_com');">Cardinal</a>, the retirement community at NHE, and the 17-story CapTrust tower is moving forward... and all without TIFs!  The Cardinal webpage is <a href='http://www.thecardinalatnorthhills.com/'  target="_blank" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker('/outgoing/www_thecardinalatnorthhills_com');">here.</a>  Seriously, TIFs aside, Kane has done a great job with NH and his vision for the east side is moving along nicely.  He deserves major kudos for tapping into a major emerging market and adding much needed density, mixed use development, and walkability in "midtown."  While not perfect, it's certainly in the direction of what I'd like to see in other planned unit developments inthe city.<br /><br />Here are some renderings of the Cardinal:<br /><br /><img src="http://www.thecardinalatnorthhills.com/index/mainImage.jpg" border="0" class="linked-image" /><br /><img src="http://www.thecardinalatnorthhills.com/about_cardinal/mainImage.jpg" border="0" class="linked-image" /><br /><img src="http://www.thecardinalatnorthhills.com/residences/mainImage.jpg" border="0" class="linked-image" /><br /><br />Here's a nice aerial rendering with the Cardinal featured to the east (upper left), and the CapTrust tower to the west (lower right):<br /><br /><a href='http://outdoors.webshots.com/photo/2694850790098570895HqkwJE'  target="_blank" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker('/outgoing/outdoors_webshots_com');"><img src="http://inlinethumb32.webshots.com/33823/2694850790098570895S600x600Q85.jpg" border="0" class="linked-image" /></a>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 11:59:43 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>ChiefJoJo</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wake County Public Schools and growth</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=38456&view=findpost&p=973035]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=38456&view=findpost&p=973035]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Raleigh City Council unanimously backed <a href='http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/2841993/'  target="_blank" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker('/outgoing/www_wral_com');">the current school board</a> district-based structure, as expected.  Good news.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 11:40:22 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>ChiefJoJo</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Triangle relocation thread</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=18722&view=findpost&p=972991]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=18722&view=findpost&p=972991]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<!--quoteo(post=972959:date=May 8 2008, 10&#58;16 AM:name=JeffC)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (JeffC &#064; May 8 2008, 10&#58;16 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=972959"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Not meaning to bash...you just need to understand that the typical northern rust belt pattern of blighted, high crime innner city/rich white suburbs doesn't hold to the same extent here. Despite the best efforts of the affluent parents of Cary and Apex, we have a unitary school system where the wealthy parts of the metropolis have not been allowed to set up their own enclaves.<br /><br /> And the comment about rich white kids crashing daddy's sports car isn't a cliche, its, sadly, a fact:<br /><br /><a href='http://www.newsobserver.com/102/story/415122.html'  target="_blank" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker('/outgoing/www_newsobserver_com');">4 crash victims were Wakefield seniors (March, 2006 N&O)</a><br /><br /><a href='http://www.localtechwire.com/news/local/story/157418/'  target="_blank" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker('/outgoing/www_localtechwire_com');">Another Wakefield High Student Killed In Car Crash</a><br /><br /><a href='http://wrallocaltechwire.com/news/local/story/1228893/'  target="_blank" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker('/outgoing/wrallocaltechwire_com');">Wakefield High Students Charged After Classmate Killed in Crash (March, 2007)</a><br /><br />(these are three separate incidents).<br /><br />Poor kids ride the bus...<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--><br /><br /><br />Wow, that really is a problem there.  I haven't heard of any such incidents around here lately, but there is a drinking problem in many of our surrounding schools.  We don't here much about drugs, but I'm sure they are out there.  Our Middle and High School, Fox Lane MS and HS, Bedford, NY is the most diverse in Northern Westchester.  With about 14% Hispanic and 6% Afri-American and a reduced lunch percentage of about 12%.  That compares to the surrounding districts that are over 90% white with less than 1% reduced lunches.  Part of the reason for this is that one of the towns, Mt Kisco, is districted to the same schools and is highly Hispanic.  I've heard many parents say they like the fact that it's a little diverse and helps keep their children "grounded". <br /><br />It is very important for us to instill work ethics in our child. I remember in High School I had to walk 10 blocks and then take 3 city buses (Pvt School) to get to school.  I didn't get MY first used car until I began college, and I had to pay for half of that. Will we buy our daughter a new car at 17?  Only if she turns out to be an astute hard working student.  That car would also never be a "BMW".  I'm talking Honda Civic here <img src="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":)" border="0" alt="smile.gif" /> .]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 10:12:10 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>Movingsouth</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Triangle relocation thread</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=18722&view=findpost&p=972959]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=18722&view=findpost&p=972959]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not meaning to bash...you just need to understand that the typical northern rust belt pattern of blighted, high crime innner city/rich white suburbs doesn't hold to the same extent here. Despite the best efforts of the affluent parents of Cary and Apex, we have a unitary school system where the wealthy parts of the metropolis have not been allowed to set up their own enclaves.<br /><br /> And the comment about rich white kids crashing daddy's sports car isn't a cliche, its, sadly, a fact:<br /><br /><a href='http://www.newsobserver.com/102/story/415122.html'  target="_blank" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker('/outgoing/www_newsobserver_com');">4 crash victims were Wakefield seniors (March, 2006 N&O)</a><br /><br /><a href='http://www.localtechwire.com/news/local/story/157418/'  target="_blank" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker('/outgoing/www_localtechwire_com');">Another Wakefield High Student Killed In Car Crash</a><br /><br /><a href='http://wrallocaltechwire.com/news/local/story/1228893/'  target="_blank" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker('/outgoing/wrallocaltechwire_com');">Wakefield High Students Charged After Classmate Killed in Crash (March, 2007)</a><br /><br />(these are three separate incidents).<br /><br />Poor kids ride the bus...]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 09:16:26 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>JeffC</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Green Square</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=20053&view=findpost&p=972881]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=20053&view=findpost&p=972881]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<!--quoteo(post=972499:date=May 7 2008, 09&#58;52 AM:name=DwnTwnRaleighGuy)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (DwnTwnRaleighGuy &#064; May 7 2008, 09&#58;52 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=972499"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->This is of course off topic, but both Meeker and Perdue went for Obama, not Hillary!<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--><br /><br />Sorry, I got caught up in a rant moment, lol.  I meant to say Easley for Hillary.   <img src="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/style_emoticons/default/whistling.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":whistling:" border="0" alt="whistling.gif" />]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 23:43:48 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>DPK</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>222 Glenwood</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=8721&view=findpost&p=972863]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=8721&view=findpost&p=972863]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just got a "developer Incentive closeout" email  on this project. They have 12 units left. People to close on the first 6 of those get discounts with the first closer getting the biggest discount and declining from there. They range in price from high 200's to low 400's.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 22:49:42 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>Jones133</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>222 Glenwood</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=8721&view=findpost&p=972777]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=8721&view=findpost&p=972777]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<!--quoteo(post=970860:date=May 2 2008, 12&#58;57 PM:name=tjoad)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (tjoad &#064; May 2 2008, 12&#58;57 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=970860"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Sorry no pics but it was the old Warren Distributing building, which was a lowrise, brick, sprawling brick building set back a good distance from the street.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--><br /><br />For the record, the Warren building was not setback. The front door was on the sidewalk along with the front of the building.<br />]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 19:28:44 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>Subway Scoundrel</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Green Square</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=20053&view=findpost&p=972773]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=20053&view=findpost&p=972773]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<!--quoteo(post=972465:date=May 7 2008, 07&#58;32 AM:name=dmccall)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (dmccall &#064; May 7 2008, 07&#58;32 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=972465"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Well, this project and Meeker's plea may come to the forefront of the gubernatorial race. In all of Perdue's Edwardsian violin playing about how hard it is for everyone (nevermind that we <i>could not </i>book a $400+ a night room at Disney for our vacation because of excess demand. Want a nice restaurant, book it 180+days out because they are slam full), we've seen no evidence that Perdue wants to centralize the state government and bring thousands of workers back to our urban core. Meanwhile McCrory's track record on urban renewal speaks for itself. If the state government goes like Charlotte has under McCrory, expect big time urban renewal projects across the state.<br /><br />I'd like to see our State government get on the page of all the good work that has happened around here recently. They need to listen to Meeker.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--><br /><br /><br />I think McCrory has pushed the urban core when others are paying for it like Wachovia and The Monster Bank of America, but when it is Raleigh, state government and he has think tanks who got him in the gov mansion, I am not so sure he will push for state governmnet urban core.    I will believe it when I see it.   And although I have not heard Perdue say she will, I have not heard her say she will not. <br /><br />This coming from someone who has partied with the Charlotte canidate and has close family who are long time freinds of his.<br />]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 19:10:40 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>Subway Scoundrel</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Green Square</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=20053&view=findpost&p=972717]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=20053&view=findpost&p=972717]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Disney's hotel rooms and restaurants are slammed because the weak US dollar is attracting a lot of foreign tourism, especially from countries on the Euro and Pound Sterling.  It would be nice to see some of that money come to our area, but Green Square in itself isn't going to make that happen.  It would be cool to position Raleigh as a 21st century innovation/eco-tourism destination, but that is going to require more than a shimmer wall on the convention center and LEDs in trafic signals and parking deck lighting.<br /><br />A Govenor McCrory administration could go either way -- a strong Green Square with corporate investment (via sponsored displays and/or research in the labs -- "selling out science" or "synergy"?) or a weakened DENR with a slashed budget (punishment for keeping Duke Power in check) and office space leased from the lowest bidder.  I could see him distributing state government  jobs across the state (or just shipped to Charlotte) in the name of "job creation" and/or "economic stimulus".  This might be good for some programs, but has not worked so well for one of McCrory's biggest pet peeve -- NCDOT.<br /><br />Perdue's "green jobs" initiative could lead to a stronger Green Square, but down east politicians have been notoriously anti-urban, not seeing the forest for the saved trees.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:30:30 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>ncwebguy</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wake County Public Schools and growth</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=38456&view=findpost&p=972708]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=38456&view=findpost&p=972708]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<!--quoteo(post=972307:date=May 6 2008, 04&#58;08 PM:name=ncwebguy)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ncwebguy &#064; May 6 2008, 04&#58;08 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=972307"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->The Wake County Board of Commissioners are working on a plan that puts themselves in charge of building and maintaing the county's schools while leaving the operations of the school system itself to the school board.  On the surface, this looks like a good idea, but it could get ugly in a hurry:<br />- Commissioners put schools only where  campaign fundraising developers tell them to.  <br />- Commissioners decide to stop mataining some schools (Southeast Raleigh, ITB) and spending that money on schools elsewhere (Cary/Apex/Wake Forest).<br />- Schools built as cheaply as possible to "save taxpayer dollars" initially, but end up costing more over time due to maintenance costs.<br />- A repeat their recent mistake - ignore growth trends and deny that new schools are needed while schools become overcrowded, resulting in year round calendars<br />- Cutting school operation funds (bye bye arts!) to pay for higher construction costs.<br /><br />It sounds like the board is promising more money for operations as a compromise, but since they control the purse strings, that money could easily be short lived.<br /><br />It is another power grab by a handful of commissioners and I hope the school board shuts this down, and any move that would make more than one or two school board positions at-large.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--><br /><br />Well said, I 100% agree...  I don't see the reason or real benefit for this change.  We already enjoy a great school system and our property values reflect that.  I fear this will trash everything.  The county commissioners are 100% in the pocket of developers, the proof was easily seen when they endorsed the North Hills Tiff.  It was business community that came up with this idea in the first place.  What the heck do they have to do with this argument in the first place?<br /><br />Gurley Man is leading the charge on this...  I worry that because of the flack the school board will naturally get over the upcoming bonds, that they will let the building and maintenance go to help ensure their own political future.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:14:45 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>Pack52</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>How should we pay for growth?</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=23731&view=findpost&p=972695]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=23731&view=findpost&p=972695]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don't think the general assembly should pull a county's right to vote on a tranfer fee, regardless of it failing in 20 counties so far.  Most of those referendums had no direction for the revenue, so of course they failed.  If they showed those dollars would go to school construction or road improvments or anything specific and needed, it would have done better.  Does anyone know why it failed in Orange County, other than the Home Builder's Association's "stop the home tax" campaign?<br /><br />The sales tax option is also failing for the most part.  It passed in one county and failed in several others, again because there was little to no description of where the generated revenue would go.<br /><br />In Raleigh, I think the <b>planning</b> commission needs to be renamed since their only plan is to do what is best for the development lobby.  A gradual increase to the impact fee?  That would have been a good idea ten years ago, when the impact fee had not been changed for only 10 years at the time.  Raleigh is behind in upgrading parks, roads, etc. already due to the planning commission approving everything that came before it, now they want to continue to place that burden on the existing tax base.  Wow.<br /><br />The lower imapct fees are a "deal" for *devlopers*, not home buyers.  It is sad that a "planning" commission member is on the record bragging about it.  Should we be thankful that Mr. Haq isn't calling for a reduction in impact fees due to a "bad" economy for the rest of the country?  How much of a subsidy do developers need?]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:53:59 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>ncwebguy</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>How should we pay for growth?</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=23731&view=findpost&p=972685]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=23731&view=findpost&p=972685]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[here's an <a href='http://www.newraleigh.com/articles/archive/raleigh-recession-proof/'  target="_blank" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker('/outgoing/www_newraleigh_com');">article on New Raleigh</a> having to do with Impact Fees and the commission's vote yesterday]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:21:32 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>waltergropius</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Triangle Regional Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=7465&view=findpost&p=972673]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=7465&view=findpost&p=972673]]></guid>
		<description>Nice, thanks for the update.</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 14:54:44 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>cophead567</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Triangle Regional Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=7465&view=findpost&p=972654]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=7465&view=findpost&p=972654]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In response to my complaint I got a prompt reply from the director of bus operations Laurie Barrett. The buses that were part of the pilot program are the ones with no padding whatsoever. The seat inserts on those will be replaced with the padded inserts. Evidently this complaint has been common. TTA is ordering some more buses for delivery later this year. Ms. Barrett attached a photo of the seats that will be ordered for these buses. They have higher backs and are very similar to the ones on the old buses.<br /><br />She didn't mention anything that can or will be done about the lack of head rests on the current buses. Realistically I wouldn't get my hopes up.<br />]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 13:58:06 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>orulz</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Hillsborough (Reynolds Tower)</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=10353&view=findpost&p=972646]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=10353&view=findpost&p=972646]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<!--quoteo(post=972559:date=May 7 2008, 11&#58;50 AM:name=ChiefJoJo)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ChiefJoJo &#064; May 7 2008, 11&#58;50 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=972559"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec--><a href='http://www.newsobserver.com/news/story/1064051.html'  target="_blank" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker('/outgoing/www_newsobserver_com');">N&O's coverage</a>.  The issue is referred to the BED committee for discussion.  The article says reynolds hopes to have financing ready to enable a winter construction start date.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--><br /><br />How many more times will I have to read this?<br /><br />Quorum was a nice building and hasn't sold out all the condos. This building will only lag due to the price points these developers continue to hit.  It's time for someone from out of tow, with bigger plans, to come in and build something. I'd like to see something with either apartments, or much less expensive condos.<br /><br />If the Reynolds' insist they can get financing, let the city press them by getting proposals from others. It's time to start a fire under their feet.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 13:25:14 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>Transplant</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Triangle Food Scene</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=40568&view=findpost&p=972599]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=40568&view=findpost&p=972599]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<!--quoteo(post=972536:date=May 7 2008, 11&#58;20 AM:name=ChiefJoJo)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ChiefJoJo &#064; May 7 2008, 11&#58;20 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=972536"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Is Globe part of Rocky Top?<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--><br />No.  They're loosely affiliated with Bistro 607, according to their website.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 11:57:20 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>RaleighRob</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Triangle Regional Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=7465&view=findpost&p=972585]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=7465&view=findpost&p=972585]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<!--quoteo(post=972546:date=May 7 2008, 09&#58;34 AM:name=orulz)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (orulz &#064; May 7 2008, 09&#58;34 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=972546"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Agreed. In my experience on the new buses, some of them have basically no padding and are terrible to sit on for more than 15 or 20 minutes, while others have about 1" of extra padding that actually makes a huge difference and makes the seats usable. However, the higher backs and headrests from the old buses are sorely missed. It looks to me like the metal rails can be unbolted from the seats, so perhaps a head rest could be bolted on in their place?<br /><br />I have sent a complaint to TTA to this effect, and I suggest that you do the same.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--><br /><br />I too have sent a complaint in regards to there more/most uncomfortable brand new buses, hopefully I will hear back...]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 11:39:18 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>DwnTwnRaleighGuy</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>How should we pay for growth?</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=23731&view=findpost&p=972566]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=23731&view=findpost&p=972566]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<!--quoteo(post=967387:date=Apr 24 2008, 05&#58;38 PM:name=ChiefJoJo)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ChiefJoJo &#064; Apr 24 2008, 05&#58;38 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=967387"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->I don't know if you've caught the resurrected 'home tax' ads lately, but I have.  Orange County is <a href='http://www.newsobserver.com/news/orange/story/1048063.html'  target="_blank" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker('/outgoing/www_newsobserver_com');">considering</a> the transfer tax on May 6.  It should be interesting to see what happens.  Orange is unquestionably the most liberal county in NC, so there is a tendency to say after getting voted down 16-0 last fall if it can't pass there, it probably can't pass anywhere, and might be repealed by the legislature.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--><br />Well, the results are in, and the transfer tax failed <a href='http://www.wral.com/news/local/politics/story/2830778/'  target="_blank" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker('/outgoing/www_wral_com');">miserably once again</a>:  66% against.  You can kiss goodbye any chance of the transfer tax moving forward after this, and I would suspect there is a good chance of it being repealed in the state general assembly.  Either it's just a bad idea (even though a few NE counties NC already have a 1% fee) helped along by the homebuilders, not the right time (recession, lagging home prices), or people simply do not see the need to raise any revenues whatsoever.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 10:55:27 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>ChiefJoJo</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Hillsborough (Reynolds Tower)</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=10353&view=findpost&p=972559]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=10353&view=findpost&p=972559]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href='http://www.newsobserver.com/news/story/1064051.html'  target="_blank" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker('/outgoing/www_newsobserver_com');">N&O's coverage</a>.  The issue is referred to the BED committee for discussion.  The article says reynolds hopes to have financing ready to enable a winter construction start date.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 10:50:08 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>ChiefJoJo</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Triangle Regional Transit</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=7465&view=findpost&p=972546]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=7465&view=findpost&p=972546]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<!--quoteo(post=972521:date=May 7 2008, 10&#58;45 AM:name=cophead567)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cophead567 &#064; May 7 2008, 10&#58;45 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=972521"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->I've been riding the bus a couple times a week now for about a month and it is funny to me that I actually prefer the older buses versus the new ones. Yes, the new ones look better on the outside, but who cares, they are not as comfortable as the old ones. The old ones had nicer seats and something you could actually call a headrest. The newer ones are filled with metal rails and a "sheet" of cushion on plastic chairs. This is key in a long ride from DTR to RTP. It might be a small point to some but the details are important for those that use the TT buses for long trips across the triangle. By long I do not mean distance, I mostly mean time; bus is just too slow. <br /><br />Where is that train??? <img src="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/style_emoticons/default/dry.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid="&lt;_&lt;" border="0" alt="dry.gif" /><!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--><br />Agreed. In my experience on the new buses, some of them have basically no padding and are terrible to sit on for more than 15 or 20 minutes, while others have about 1" of extra padding that actually makes a huge difference and makes the seats usable. However, the higher backs and headrests from the old buses are sorely missed. It looks to me like the metal rails can be unbolted from the seats, so perhaps a head rest could be bolted on in their place?<br /><br />I have sent a complaint to TTA to this effect, and I suggest that you do the same.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 10:34:24 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>orulz</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>How should we pay for growth?</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=23731&view=findpost&p=972539]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=23731&view=findpost&p=972539]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href='http://www.newsobserver.com/news/story/1063693.html'  target="_blank" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker('/outgoing/www_newsobserver_com');">Impact fees fail test</a><br /><br />This is a similar article talking about how the Planning Commission supports a more "gradual" increase in impact fees to which Meeker responded:<br /><i><br />"Raleigh's impact fees are so low that they don't have a significant impact on the economics of building a house," he said. "Houses built with the new fees won't be completed until 2009 or 2010, and the economy may well be different by then."</i><br /><br />The biggest issue in the recent council elections was the raising of impact fees.  These impact fees should have been raised on long time ago and now the excuse is the economy.  I doubt these fees will deter anyone from buying a house, especially if they're the same fees they would pay outside of Raleigh.  I am still confident the council will vote to increase the fees all at once.]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 10:25:03 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>tjoad</author>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>