<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>UP|The Middle East</title>
	<description></description>
	<link>http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php</link>
	<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 04:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<ttl>32</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Burj Khalifa/Burj Dubai Update</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=28252&view=findpost&p=1108584]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=28252&view=findpost&p=1108584]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi all.<br />
<br />
Now that the BK's height is ratified by the CTBUH I've made the final version of my plan using the official ratified numbers that measure from level B1. All my previous versions used the construction plan numbers that measure from the ground level. I've also upated and included my tier methodology. Lastly I've done up a giant labeled render with all the names and heights of each level, section, and tier.<br />
<br />
All 3 are zipped into one file<br />
<br />
<a href='http://b.imagehost.org/download/0550/BK_Plan_Methodology_Labeled_Render' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'>BK_Plan_Methodology_Labeled_Render.zip (2.2 MB)</a><br />
<br />
I hope you enjoy them as much as I enjoyed making them.<br />
<br />
 <img src='http://www.saveaplanet.org/cdn/img/public/style_emoticons/default/grin.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':D' />  <img src='http://www.saveaplanet.org/cdn/img/public/style_emoticons/default/grin.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':D' />  <img src='http://www.saveaplanet.org/cdn/img/public/style_emoticons/default/grin.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':D' /><br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 04:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Fury</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Burj Khalifa/Burj Dubai Update</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=28252&view=findpost&p=1108138]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=28252&view=findpost&p=1108138]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[^ That's an amazing shot from the very top. I can't fathom just how high this really is, or do I want to find out. <img src='http://www.saveaplanet.org/cdn/img/public/style_emoticons/default/scared.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':scared:' /><br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 11:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Neo</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Burj Khalifa/Burj Dubai Update</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=28252&view=findpost&p=1108129]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=28252&view=findpost&p=1108129]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi all.<br />
<br />
The Universe is no longer tilted !!<br />
<br />
<span style='font-size: 36px;'><span style='color: Red'>The Burj Khalifa Height Claim is now officially ratified by the CTBUH !!</span></span><br />
<br />
Woohoo !!!!!!<br />
<br />
I got an email from the CTBUH yesterday with the details. I've been discussing with them, through emails, the finer points of the height claim for a few weeks now. I am happy to say in some small way I contributed to the process if in no other way but to keep Emaar honest. <img src='http://www.saveaplanet.org/cdn/img/public/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':)' /><br />
<br />
The heights are measured from level B1 as it is the lowest open-air pedestrian entrance. Level B1 is technically a basement level but because it has an entrance to the office lobby via an escalator it fits the criteria. Also because there is a large hole in the concourse level podium above for the water feature that sits on level B1 to stick up through it fits the open-air criteria.<br />
<br />
The plans measure from the floor of the ground level. Now that the CTBUH has given the OK to measure from level B1 we must add 6.00 for the concourse level and 4.00 for level B1. This adds 10.00 m. to the total height of each level, section, and tier. This is great as all the heights for each individual level, section, and tier remain the same as the plans.<br />
<br />
The following in bold are the 3 measures the CTBUH recognizes. <br />
<br />
<strong class='bbc'>Height to Tip</strong><br />
829.842 m.<br />
This measures to the top of the lightning rod. I haven't seen any shots of said lightning rod yet but here is a shot from Imre showing where it may thread on to. It sticks up 1.842 meters above the top of the guardrail we see in the shot.<br />
<br />
<a href='http://i.imagehost.org/view/0137/09_12_31_46_from_the_top_of_the_pinnacle' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'><img src='http://i.imagehost.org/0137/09_12_31_46_from_the_top_of_the_pinnacle.jpg' alt='Posted Image' class='bbc_img' /></a><br />
<br />
<span class='bbc_underline'>Top of the aircraft warning lights / Beacons.</span><br />
828.73 m.<br />
Cul and I have been estimating the top of the beacons at 0.6 above the guardrail. We were close but 0.73 is the official number - cool.<br />
<br />
<strong class='bbc'>Height to Architectural Top</strong><br />
828.00 m.<br />
This is the top of tier 30 - top of the pinnacle - top of the guardrail around the top platform. I posted some time ago on the evolution of my thoughts on where the arch. top is. Initially the last revision of the top platform had the floor at 818 (then) which was the top of tier 30. Then there was some talk of the difference between arch. top and height to tip being 2.0 meters so I was thinking the floor of the current top platform was the arch top and the top of the beacons was the height to tip with the guardrail being an extension of tier 30's pipe. Lastly a few weeks ago I mentioned here and to the CTBUH the guardrail is most likely it because the fins and their spacing are where they should be right up to the guardrail (if the guardrail was an extension the fin configuration would have to be altered from the plans)- nice to have confirmation.<br />
<br />
<span class='bbc_underline'>Floor with the Hatch of the Top Platform</span><br />
Approx. 826.6 m.<br />
The guardrail <em class='bbc'>is</em> the top of tier 30 and the floor is welded down inside it by approx. 1.4 m.<br />
<br />
<strong class='bbc'>Highest Occupied Floor</strong><br />
Level 154 - 584.50 m.<br />
Altin - this number is correct. Level 154 as per the plans is at 574.50. There was some discussion of level 160 being recognized as the highest occupied level as it has the mosque (prayer room). The decision was obviously to go with 154 which is the highest level occupied by tenants. Well sort of tenants as 153 and 154 are reserved for the chairman of Emaar.<br />
<br />
<span class='bbc_underline'>Observation Deck</span><br />
Level 124 - 452.10 m.<br />
The highest outdoor observation level in the world.<br />
<br />
<span class='bbc_underline'>Floorcount</span><br />
163 / 1 basement.<br />
This one has an issue. Well - I have an issue with what the CTBUH has stated is the number. I emailed them yesterday on it. The plans have it at 162 / 3 lower levels :<br />
- 160 less 4 skipped (41, 74, 110, and 137) plus 6 (Ground, 155 mezz., 158 mezz., 160 mezz. 1, 160 mezz. 2, and 160 mezz. 3) equals 162<br />
- 3 lower levels - Concourse, B1, and B2. (there is an unused level below B2 that I call the raft level but it isn't counted)<br />
1 - If the concourse is included we should have 163 / 2 basement.<br />
2 - If level B1 is included then we should have164 / 1.<br />
I am assuming all of the mezzanines fit the criteria to be included being the count is as high as it is. Of course there is another possibility - that one of the mezz's isn't counted and the concourse and B1 is. I don't think so for 2 reasons :<br />
1 - All of the mezzanines have a smaller floorprint than the level below and are not tenant levels. I would think they would all fit the criteria or none would.<br />
2 - Level B1 is technically a basement level even though it is included in the measurements.<br />
I am leaning towards 163 / 2. I will post when I hear back from the CTBUH.<br />
<br />
Here is a shot from Gerald I labelled to show the official ratified heights.<br />
<br />
<a href='http://d.imagehost.org/view/0379/Official_Ratified_Heights' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'><img src='http://d.imagehost.org/0379/Official_Ratified_Heights.jpg' alt='Posted Image' class='bbc_img' /></a><br />
<br />
I will be working on my final version of my BK Plan in the next week. I will also be adding numbers to a huge labelled render now that I have the official ones. I will post a link to the zip once completed.<br />
<br />
Ahhhh - I feel complete ... <img src='http://www.saveaplanet.org/cdn/img/public/style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':lol:' /><br />
<br />
 <img src='http://www.saveaplanet.org/cdn/img/public/style_emoticons/default/grin.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':D' />  <img src='http://www.saveaplanet.org/cdn/img/public/style_emoticons/default/grin.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':D' />  <img src='http://www.saveaplanet.org/cdn/img/public/style_emoticons/default/grin.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':D' /><br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 05:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Fury</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>2.3 gigapixel image of Burj Dubai</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=51065&view=findpost&p=1102092]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=51065&view=findpost&p=1102092]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='citation'><a class='snapback' rel='citation' href='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=1100864'><img src='http://www.saveaplanet.org/cdn/img/public/style_images/up2010a/snapback.png' alt='View Post' /></a>Neo, on 28 December 2009 - 09:03 AM, said:</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>Check out this 2.3 gigapixel image of Burj Dubai. The images were stitched together to create a super high resolution photo of the skyscraper so you can zoom in quite far on any part of the image and still keep the detail.<br />
<br />
<a href='http://www.dxbae.com/IMG_1844b-Panorama.html' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'>http://www.dxbae.com/IMG_1844b-Panorama.html</a></div></div><br />
<br />
I guess it was pretty cool since its currently down due to high traffic.<br />
<br />
Its amazing to finally see this project finished, what a building.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 20:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>jdkacz</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Burj Khalifa opened today</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=51087&view=findpost&p=1101480]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=51087&view=findpost&p=1101480]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What was known as the Burj Dubai opened its doors today with the new name of Burj Khalifa, named after the president of UAE Khalifa Bin Zayed. I'm sure most of us are familiar with the tower and its amazing height so not much more needs to be said about the project. I'm curious if anyone else has a hankering to visit Dubai to see this amazing structure in person though. <img src='http://www.saveaplanet.org/cdn/img/public/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':)' /><br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Neo</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>2.3 gigapixel image of Burj Dubai</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=51065&view=findpost&p=1100864]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=51065&view=findpost&p=1100864]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check out this 2.3 gigapixel image of Burj Dubai. The images were stitched together to create a super high resolution photo of the skyscraper so you can zoom in quite far on any part of the image and still keep the detail.<br />
<br />
<a href='http://www.dxbae.com/IMG_1844b-Panorama.html' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'>http://www.dxbae.com/IMG_1844b-Panorama.html</a><br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 14:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Neo</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Burj Khalifa/Burj Dubai Update</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=28252&view=findpost&p=1097466]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=28252&view=findpost&p=1097466]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi all.<br />
<br />
Some thoughts on the CTBUH and the BD.<br />
<br />
I will use copy and paste direct quotes from the CTBUH site.<br />
<br />
<p class='citation'>Quote</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>Height is measured from the level1 of the lowest, significant2 , open-air3, pedestrian4 entrance ...<br />
Footnotes:<br />
1 Level:  finished floor level at threshold of the lowest entrance door <br />
2 Significant:  the entrance should be predominantly above existing or pre-existing grade and permit access to one or more primary uses in the building via elevators, as opposed to ground floor retail or other uses which solely relate/connect to the immediately adjacent external environment. Thus entrances via below-grade sunken plazas or similar are not generally recognized. Also note that access to car park and/or ancillary/support areas are not considered significant entrances. <br />
3 Open-air: the entrance must be located directly off of an external space at that level that is open to air.<br />
4 Pedestrian: refers to common building users or occupants and is intended to exclude service, ancillary, or similar areas.</div></div><br />
<br />
1 - As was figured previously the measurement will begin from the floor of the level.<br />
2 - All of these criteria are met by the concourse level. The entrance is obviously above the existing grade. The pre-existing grade before the hole was dug is below the entrance also. I think I read somewhere it was approx 1 meter above the DMD (Dubai Municipal Datum) and this seems pretty close looking at how deep the excavation was, perhaps Altin knows this ? The top of the raft is 3.75 m. below the DMD. The concourse level floor is 9.25 m. above the raft or 5.5 m. above the DMD so we're safe to assume this criteria is met.<br />
3 and 4 are both met for sure.<br />
Pretty much guaranteed the concourse level will be included in the height adding 6.0 meters to all 3 official measures as compared to the plans.<br />
<br />
<p class='citation'>Quote</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>The number of floors should include the ground floor level and be the number of main floors above ground, including any significant mezzanine floors and major mechanical plant floors. Mechanical mezzanines should not be included if they have a significantly smaller floor area than the major floors below nor should mechanical penthouses or plant rooms protruding above the general roof area. Note: CTBUH floor counts may differ from published accounts, as it is common in some regions of the world for certain floor levels not to be included (e.g. the level 4, 14, 24, etc in Hong Kong). <br />
<br />
Highest occupied floor: this is intended to recognize conditioned space which is designed to be safely and legally occupied by residents, workers or other building users on a consistent basis. It does not include service or mechanical areas which experience occasional maintenance access, etc.</div></div><br />
<br />
The highest occupied level and number of levels are not so clear going by this.<br />
Whether the mezzanines will be included is a question mark. Level 154 will be included surely as it covers the entire area of the level below . Also it is named as a seperate level and only its use is shown as a mezzanine in the plans. Now 158M, 160M1, 160M2,and 160M3 are another matter on 2 fronts.<br />
1 - These are mechanical mezzanines and do have a smaller floorprint than the level below. It will be up to the CTBUH to decide if the difference in size warrants including them.<br />
2 - By looking at the wording there may be some room to include levels and/or mezzanines above level 154 in the official count. Level 154 is the highest level occupied by tennants but the wording includes occupied by workers on a consistant basis. This may allow levels up to 160M3 to be included in the official count and in the height to the highest occupied level measure.<br />
The plans levels count of 162 already allows for the 4 skipped levels, includes the 6 mezz. levels (which it should IMO), and does not include the concourse.<br />
<br />
The official count could be anywhere from 158 to 163.<br />
The height to the highest occupied level could be anywhere from level 154 - 580.5 meters to level 160M3 - 630.1 meters (from the concourse and assuming they measure up to the floor of those levels which they probably do). I kinda doubt all of the mezzanines will be considered as occupied on a consistant basis but that remains to be seen.<br />
<br />
<p class='citation'>Quote</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>When is a tall building considered to be “completed”?<br />
A completed building can be considered such—and added to the “tallest” lists—if it fulfils all of the following three criteria:<br />
1) topped out structurally and architecturally,<br />
2) fully-clad,<br />
3) open for business, or at least partially occupied</div></div><br />
<br />
Number 3 of these criteria allows the official height to be recorded right after the soft opening. Good news IMO - I was wondering if they would wait untill the whole of the works was completed.<br />
<br />
<p class='citation'>Quote</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>The developer Emaar is still confidential about the height of the building and we don't mind it being confidential. But if they open the Burj and don't release the height, then we will measure the height of the building. During construction it is fine, but after construction we want to know and our people want to know its final height.</div></div><br />
<br />
<br />
I am kinda surprised by this. The developer could be incorrect somehow and overstate the height. There are any number of reasons for this. Something could have deviated from the plans by a half a meter, etc. I don't see this being the case as most companies are honest but it kinda takes away from the "official-ness" of it all. With all the secrecy around this project I'm sure the CTBUH will have to do their own measurement anyway.<br />
<br />
My guess for the height to tip will be 824.6 meters. This makes an assumption on the beacon height and doesn't allow for any settling in case they don't actually measure. I hope the CTBUH does measure and I hope Emaar puts up a flagpole, lightning rod, or antenae to push this height up even further.<br />
<br />
cheers<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Fury</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Dubai's Nakheel Tower Project]]></title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=47907&view=findpost&p=1087345]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=47907&view=findpost&p=1087345]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just found out about this the other day. If he can pull of this tower it will be amazing. This thing will blow the Burj Dubai our of the water, and it's already humongous!<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 23:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Spartan</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Burj Khalifa/Burj Dubai Update</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=28252&view=findpost&p=1076451]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=28252&view=findpost&p=1076451]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi all.<br />
<br />
I found something interesting in my pile of BD info.<br />
First I would like to mention that I am utterly amazed at the planning that goes into big projects like this. I believe project management and planning is something I could really enjoy.<br />
<br />
Anyway - here is the first lines of the milestones and work to be done schedule. It is for the 705 meter revision (the last revision before the current one) and is from April '07. What amazes me is there is approx. 350 "pages" this size in this schedule ! It includes every and anything from concrete work to painting to handover dates. Fricken enormous thought process !<br />
<br />
<a href='http://g.imagehost.org/view/0799/Magical_Snap_2009_06_28_19_41_001' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'><img src='http://g.imagehost.org/0799/Magical_Snap_2009_06_28_19_41_001.jpg' alt='Posted Image' class='bbc_img' /></a><br />
<br />
<br />
The shop drawing submittal alone must be a gigantic collection. The staffing schedule for near 10,000 people must be huge. The cashflow is something I have and is an extremely detailed collection of pages on its own. The construction method statement I also have and is hundreds of pages in various PDF files. Too bad they are all for the old revision. These are just the items from this "page" - needless to say there are many other big areas of planning. I could go on but suffice to say the amount of people and thought that goes into getting ready for a project of this size, let alone actually doing it, are bloody enormous.<br />
<br />
 We can see that over 2 years ago the estimated opening date for the hotel was May 09 '09. Of course we now know it is set for 09 09 09 as part of the soft opening (and probably the only part of the structure that will be part of the soft opening). So that is 4 months behind the schedule of 2 years ago.<br />
<br />
The interesting estimated date is the completion of the whole of the works and the above level 42 handover. 2 years ago the date was Feb 14 2010. I find it questionable that the hotel opening is 4 months behind and completion is 3 months ahead of schedule ( Dec 20 '09 is the latest word for the grand opening). Although it's anyone's guess I seriously wonder whether the grand opening date will be met. Also there must be a month or so between completion and opening.<br />
<br />
To sum up - the estimated opening date from 2 years ago was around Mar '10 and Emaar was saying much earlier all along ... but I digress.<br />
I think we could see an opening date well into 2010.<br />
<br />
 <img src='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/grin.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':D' />  <img src='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/grin.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':D' />  <img src='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/grin.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':D' /><br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 03:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Fury</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Burj Khalifa/Burj Dubai Update</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=28252&view=findpost&p=1070613]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=28252&view=findpost&p=1070613]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi all.<br />
<br />
burjdubaiskyscraper - Tony Montana<br />
<br />
09 05 20<br />
<br />
<a href='http://f.imagehost.org/view/0203/09_05_20_14_from_the_burj' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'><img src='http://f.imagehost.org/0203/09_05_20_14_from_the_burj.jpg' alt='Posted Image' class='bbc_img' /></a><br />
<br />
09 05 25<br />
<br />
<a href='http://f.imagehost.org/view/0484/09_05_25_3_from_the_burj' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'><img src='http://f.imagehost.org/0484/09_05_25_3_from_the_burj.jpg' alt='Posted Image' class='bbc_img' /></a><br />
<br />
<a href='http://f.imagehost.org/view/0892/09_05_25_4_from_the_burj' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'><img src='http://f.imagehost.org/0892/09_05_25_4_from_the_burj.jpg' alt='Posted Image' class='bbc_img' /></a><br />
<br />
<a href='http://f.imagehost.org/view/0294/09_05_25_5_from_the_burj' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'><img src='http://f.imagehost.org/0294/09_05_25_5_from_the_burj.jpg' alt='Posted Image' class='bbc_img' /></a><br />
<br />
<a href='http://f.imagehost.org/view/0195/09_05_25_6_from_the_burj' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'><img src='http://f.imagehost.org/0195/09_05_25_6_from_the_burj.jpg' alt='Posted Image' class='bbc_img' /></a><br />
<br />
<a href='http://f.imagehost.org/view/0994/09_05_25_7_from_the_burj' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'><img src='http://f.imagehost.org/0994/09_05_25_7_from_the_burj.jpg' alt='Posted Image' class='bbc_img' /></a><br />
<br />
I am quite surprised to see how much landscaping is still left to be done. I figured podium zone A (the side facing the lake - with the crane above) would still have lots to do being it is the staging area for the top crane. These pics show all 3 sides have alot left to be done. Great shots though, showing there is some landscaping features coming along.<br />
<br />
 <img src='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/grin.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':D' />  <img src='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/grin.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':D' />  <img src='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/grin.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':D' /><br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 03:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Fury</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Burj Khalifa/Burj Dubai Update</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=28252&view=findpost&p=1069671]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=28252&view=findpost&p=1069671]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi all.<br />
<br />
The crane disassembly proceedure plan is (was) as follows. The revision so far is that the crane at level 99 is the Favco M220D that was on top on the North side that was taken down in Aug '07 and put up on level 99 in Nov '07 instead of an Ogawa.<br />
<br />
The first slide is just to show the 3 tower cranes.<br />
TC #1 at the bottom is the last of the 3 that is up there now.<br />
<br />
<a href='http://f.imagehost.org/view/0359/Magical_Snap_2009_05_22_20_20_001' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'><img src='http://f.imagehost.org/0359/Magical_Snap_2009_05_22_20_20_001.jpg' alt='Posted Image' class='bbc_img' /></a><br />
<br />
<a href='http://f.imagehost.org/view/0839/Magical_Snap_2009_05_22_20_22_003' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'><img src='http://f.imagehost.org/0839/Magical_Snap_2009_05_22_20_22_003.jpg' alt='Posted Image' class='bbc_img' /></a><br />
<br />
<a href='http://f.imagehost.org/view/0243/Magical_Snap_2009_05_22_20_24_004' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'><img src='http://f.imagehost.org/0243/Magical_Snap_2009_05_22_20_24_004.jpg' alt='Posted Image' class='bbc_img' /></a><br />
<br />
<a href='http://f.imagehost.org/view/0142/Magical_Snap_2009_05_22_20_25_005' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'><img src='http://f.imagehost.org/0142/Magical_Snap_2009_05_22_20_25_005.jpg' alt='Posted Image' class='bbc_img' /></a><br />
<br />
<a href='http://f.imagehost.org/view/0537/Magical_Snap_2009_05_22_20_28_006' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'><img src='http://f.imagehost.org/0537/Magical_Snap_2009_05_22_20_28_006.jpg' alt='Posted Image' class='bbc_img' /></a><br />
<br />
 <img src='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/grin.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':D' />  <img src='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/grin.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':D' />  <img src='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/grin.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':D' /><br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 19:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Fury</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>kuwait city</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=48634&view=findpost&p=1062236]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=48634&view=findpost&p=1062236]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw a program on TV a few months about that was about Kuwait City.  It was from the perspective of someone going on a visit there.   It was interesting to see how it had been rebuilt.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 19:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>monsoon</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>kuwait city</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=48634&view=findpost&p=1062199]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=48634&view=findpost&p=1062199]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='citation'><a class='snapback' rel='citation' href='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=1055750'><img src='http://www.saveaplanet.org/cdn/img/public/style_images/up2010a/snapback.png' alt='View Post' /></a>Neo, on Mar 19 2009, 02&#58;54 AM, said:</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>That's a great pano! It is certainly not a city known to many here in the US and that is really unfortunate seeing what a great skyline Kuwait City has.</div></div><br />
 <br />
Exaclty! <img src='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/blush.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':blush:' /> ... it's also weird how people know kuwait from the second gulf war and not by the good and great things it has <img src='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/silly.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':silly:' /> even though that war was in 1990.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>ku-8-ee</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Burj Khalifa/Burj Dubai Update</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=28252&view=findpost&p=1060699]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=28252&view=findpost&p=1060699]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='citation'><a class='snapback' rel='citation' href='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=1060453'><img src='http://www.saveaplanet.org/cdn/img/public/style_images/up2010a/snapback.png' alt='View Post' /></a>monsoon, on Apr 10 2009, 08&#58;34 AM, said:</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>There are several articles written recently that talk about how horrifically bad this project is and for that matter how bad that most of the projects in Dubai are.   It's completely unsustainable, and all of this would not be possible without the assistance of tens of thousands of "invisible people", essentially economic slaves, that live in several awful slave cities about 20-40 miles outside of Dubai.</div></div><br />
<br />
while i've been in awe at the speed and grandeur that dubai is being built, i have my concerns as well. i'm just not seeing how this city will be able to sustain all of these projects. i'll be interested to see what the vacancy rates of these projects will be 10 years from now. and of course there is the issue of who is actually building these projects and the conditions which they live and work.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 15:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>satalac</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Burj Khalifa/Burj Dubai Update</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=28252&view=findpost&p=1060453]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=28252&view=findpost&p=1060453]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are several articles written recently that talk about how horrifically bad this project is and for that matter how bad that most of the projects in Dubai are.   It's completely unsustainable, and all of this would not be possible without the assistance of tens of thousands of "invisible people", essentially economic slaves, that live in several awful slave cities about 20-40 miles outside of Dubai.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>monsoon</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Burj Khalifa/Burj Dubai Update</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=28252&view=findpost&p=1060384]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=28252&view=findpost&p=1060384]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here's one. From SSC<br />
<br />
<img src='http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f185/fiddlerblue/3417346133_b1686775e4_b.jpg' alt='Posted Image' class='bbc_img' /><br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 00:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Nashville_maestro</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Cactus skyscraper</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=49364&view=findpost&p=1056640]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=49364&view=findpost&p=1056640]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Middle East and the Asia region is certainly known for pushing the boundaries of architecture and this is no exception:<br />
<br />
[attachment=5642:qatar_ca...craper_4.jpg]<br />
<br />
Interestingly the windows have sunshades that open and close according to the intensity of the Sun.<br />
<br />
You can see more images on the architect's website: <a href='http://www.aesarch.com/main/profile.php' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'>http://www.aesarch.com/main/profile.php</a><br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Neo</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>kuwait city</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=48634&view=findpost&p=1055750]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=48634&view=findpost&p=1055750]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That's a great pano!  It is certainly not a city known to many here in the US and that is really unfortunate seeing what a great skyline Kuwait City has.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Neo</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Burj Khalifa/Burj Dubai Update</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=28252&view=findpost&p=1055749]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=28252&view=findpost&p=1055749]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the continuous updates on this!  This tower is quite the feat of engineering that will likely not be rivaled for some time.  I feel for the city though to have so much development and to have the markets collapse from underneath them all of a sudden.  Hopefully the city can continue to rise through this.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Neo</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Burj Khalifa/Burj Dubai Update</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=28252&view=findpost&p=1055049]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=28252&view=findpost&p=1055049]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi all.<br />
<br />
Here is 3 scans from Adrian Smith's book showing the Concourse level, Ground level, and level 1 podiums. Some of the drawings are cut off as I am using a flat panel scanner on a 600 page book. They are large so click on them to see full size.<br />
<br />
<a href='http://g.imagehost.org/view/0290/8_Podium_Concourse_Level' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'><img src='http://g.imagehost.org/t/0290/8_Podium_Concourse_Level.jpg' alt='Posted Image' class='bbc_img' /></a><br />
<br />
<a href='http://g.imagehost.org/view/0881/9_Podium_Ground_Level' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'><img src='http://g.imagehost.org/t/0881/9_Podium_Ground_Level.jpg' alt='Posted Image' class='bbc_img' /></a><br />
<br />
<a href='http://g.imagehost.org/view/0794/11_Podium_Level_1' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'><img src='http://g.imagehost.org/t/0794/11_Podium_Level_1.jpg' alt='Posted Image' class='bbc_img' /></a><br />
<br />
 <img src='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/grin.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':D' />  <img src='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/grin.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':D' />  <img src='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/grin.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':D' /><br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 19:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Fury</author>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>