<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>UP|Northwest Arkansas</title>
	<description></description>
	<link>http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 02:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<ttl>19</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Siloam Springs</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=51330&view=findpost&p=1109435]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=51330&view=findpost&p=1109435]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah Siloam Springs does often get overlooked in NWA. It's pretty much the only city in the metro that's not on the Hwy71/I-540 corridor.  I don't think Siloam Springs has seen the rapid growth other NWA communities saw in the 90's and early 00's.  But it is growing.  It could be reaching a point where it gains some impetus.  If it wasn't for the Ozark Natl Forest, I'd almost wonder if eventually you'd see some sort of population development along the Hwy 412 corridor between it and Springdale.  Anyway thanks for the info and reminder about Siloam.   <img src='http://www.saveaplanet.org/cdn/img/public/style_emoticons/default/thumbsup.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':thumbsup:' /><br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Mith242</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Siloam Springs</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=51330&view=findpost&p=1109423]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=51330&view=findpost&p=1109423]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Siloam Springs isn't a part of the main corridor that makes up NWA but is part of the metro and the largest city not in the main corridor. It has a population approaching 15,000 and is a major gateway to Arkansas from Oklahoma. The highway 412 entry sees over 22,000 vehicles per day. The city is home to John Brown University- a non-denominational college and several industries including Allen Canning. Siloam Springs saw a growth spurt along with the rest of NWA and has added much new business on the east side of town.<br />
<br />
The major economic force in Siloam Springs these days is the Cherokee Casino just across the Oklahoma border in West Siloam Springs. The casino employs over 700 with a payroll over $7 million per year. It had over 150,000 visitors last year and just recently completed an expansion that increased the complex to over 312,000 sq. ft. This includes a new 8 story, 140 room hotel. Ther has been some concern in town that the casino takes away from the religous image of Siloam Springs even though the casino is legal,a major employer, gives money to the town for services and sponsors a major festival in town. Here's a photo of the new complex.<br />
<img src='http://i194.photobucket.com/albums/z289/zman9810/DSC_0234.jpg' alt='Posted Image' class='bbc_img' /><br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 02:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>zman9810</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Crystal Bridges Museum of American Art</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=12109&view=findpost&p=1109376]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=12109&view=findpost&p=1109376]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='citation'><a class='snapback' rel='citation' href='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=1109341'><img src='http://www.saveaplanet.org/cdn/img/public/style_images/up2010a/snapback.png' alt='View Post' /></a>thewizard16, on 17 March 2010 - 08:14 AM, said:</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>The scale of the museum is supposed to be that of a major metropolitan museum, and the most significant "American Art" museum in the US, so if Alice Walton's vision is fulfilled, it could be more than a regional draw. However, I don't think one museum can completely redefine an area's tourism appeal. I do think that the combination of the Walton Arts Center, Crystal Bridges, Pea Ridge (it is the best preserved Civil War battlefield in the US- most only have a fraction of the original land protected, but almost all of the actual battle field is in the Pea Ridge park), the Razorbacks, the Naturals, and Beaver Lake is pretty appealing if NWA can market it right. It wouldn't hurt if we had a water park or big chain theme park in the area though... (if any of those execs are reading out there  <img src='http://www.saveaplanet.org/cdn/img/public/style_emoticons/default/thumbsup.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':thumbsup:' /> )</div></div><br />
I also forgot to mention the fact that it could draw people who were already traveling to Branson as well.  I've been over to the Buffalo National River area a number of times and end up striking a conversation with someone else there.  Quite a few times they'll tell me where they're from and that they were in Branson but also wanted to check out the scenery of the Arkansas Ozarks while they were in the area.  Branson draws quite a few people and I don't think it would be too much to expect that a number of them could make a side trip over to Crystal Bridges as well.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Mith242</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Crystal Bridges Museum of American Art</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=12109&view=findpost&p=1109341]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=12109&view=findpost&p=1109341]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The scale of the museum is supposed to be that of a major metropolitan museum, and the most significant "American Art" museum in the US, so if Alice Walton's vision is fulfilled, it could be more than a regional draw. However, I don't think one museum can completely redefine an area's tourism appeal. I do think that the combination of the Walton Arts Center, Crystal Bridges, Pea Ridge (it is the best preserved Civil War battlefield in the US- most only have a fraction of the original land protected, but almost all of the actual battle field is in the Pea Ridge park), the Razorbacks, the Naturals, and Beaver Lake is pretty appealing if NWA can market it right. It wouldn't hurt if we had a water park or big chain theme park in the area though... (if any of those execs are reading out there  <img src='http://www.saveaplanet.org/cdn/img/public/style_emoticons/default/thumbsup.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':thumbsup:' /> )<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 13:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>thewizard16</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Osage Creek Performing Arts Center</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=51206&view=findpost&p=1109291]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=51206&view=findpost&p=1109291]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, thanks for the information. I guess that is good news/bad news about there not being a $20 million donation. If there were one financing wouldn't be needed- you could build a very nice venue with that. On the flip side- financing made be hard to come by without a sizable gift of some kind. <br />
<br />
I do have a couple of questions though. I don't mean to be discouraging or negative but have you done marketing studies that show a clear need for a project of this kind and scope in NWA? The population base in NWA seems small for something this size when there are many all-weather venues in the region that are closer to larger metros. The arena that was proposed for Benton County several years ago would have been a likely failure because of the competition from the new arenas within a short driving distance from NWA. When agencies are looking to book acts they look for that large pool of ticket buyers close by to sell to. <br />
<br />
You somewhat addressed my second question but are you looking to have a regular large festival at Osage Creek? Seems like that would go a long ways towards having success. I certainly would like to see the project happen and look foward to hearing more about it.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>zman9810</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Osage Creek Performing Arts Center</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=51206&view=findpost&p=1109271]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=51206&view=findpost&p=1109271]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='citation'><a class='snapback' rel='citation' href='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=1109249'><img src='http://www.saveaplanet.org/cdn/img/public/style_images/up2010a/snapback.png' alt='View Post' /></a>OCPAC, on 16 March 2010 - 11:42 AM, said:</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>Hi Folks; we are so very excited to see the conversations about the Osage Creek Performing Arts Center. I would like to clarify a few things for you all:<br />
<br />
1) There is <strong class='bbc'><span class='bbc_underline'>NO 20 Million dollar</span></strong> "donation" nor was there ever. We are looking at a few different options for financing, mostly in the private sector. Money is always a big issue with any project especially one of this scope and scale, but we are confident of the merits of this project to finalize our funding.<br />
<br />
2) We are surely looking to host a diverse group of events, not only Rock & Roll. We would ideally like to see a variety that includes Classical Music as well as Pop, and performing arts.<br />
<br />
3) We need local support!! This project is so much bigger than any one person or company, our goal is to bring to the forefront all of the culture and art of the region, and give it a global spotlight. We welcome any and all input from interested parties to help us best serve the people of this great region.<br />
<br />
4) In spite of all the musings on our FB Page, there is currently no schedule of events at this time to be announced. We are actively working to oversee our logistacal and tactical planning to ensure that whatever we do is not only a success financially, but to ensure that any events are planned out well so as to minimalize the immediate impact on our communities.<br />
<br />
<br />
Thanks, and stay in touch... Osage Creek Performing Arts Center (OCPAC)</div></div><br />
Thanks for the info and clarification and welcome to the forum.   <img src='http://www.saveaplanet.org/cdn/img/public/style_emoticons/default/grin.png' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':D' /><br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Mith242</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Osage Creek Performing Arts Center</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=51206&view=findpost&p=1109249]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=51206&view=findpost&p=1109249]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Folks; we are so very excited to see the conversations about the Osage Creek Performing Arts Center. I would like to clarify a few things for you all:<br />
<br />
1) There is <strong class='bbc'><span class='bbc_underline'>NO 20 Million dollar</span></strong> "donation" nor was there ever. We are looking at a few different options for financing, mostly in the private sector. Money is always a big issue with any project especially one of this scope and scale, but we are confident of the merits of this project to finalize our funding.<br />
<br />
2) We are surely looking to host a diverse group of events, not only Rock & Roll. We would ideally like to see a variety that includes Classical Music as well as Pop, and performing arts.<br />
<br />
3) We need local support!! This project is so much bigger than any one person or company, our goal is to bring to the forefront all of the culture and art of the region, and give it a global spotlight. We welcome any and all input from interested parties to help us best serve the people of this great region.<br />
<br />
4) In spite of all the musings on our FB Page, there is currently no schedule of events at this time to be announced. We are actively working to oversee our logistacal and tactical planning to ensure that whatever we do is not only a success financially, but to ensure that any events are planned out well so as to minimalize the immediate impact on our communities.<br />
<br />
<br />
Thanks, and stay in touch... Osage Creek Performing Arts Center (OCPAC)<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>OCPAC</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Crystal Bridges Museum of American Art</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=12109&view=findpost&p=1109226]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=12109&view=findpost&p=1109226]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='citation'><a class='snapback' rel='citation' href='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=1109223'><img src='http://www.saveaplanet.org/cdn/img/public/style_images/up2010a/snapback.png' alt='View Post' /></a>aerotive, on 15 March 2010 - 11:54 PM, said:</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>I'm not so sure about increasing tourism, it's not like this area is a big tourist magnet.  How much can one museum do?  Is it supposed to be of the scale and quality of a major metro museum, the sort of museum with real drawing power?  Maybe just regional drawing power?  That said I'm certainly glad it's being built, let's not look a gift horse in the mouth...and I'll certainly visit soon after it's opened.</div></div><br />
I guess that's one of those things we'll just have to see.  I do agree it should at least be a regional draw.  We might need more in the area to help draw people from further away.  Although I can see the combination of Crystal Bridges and the architecture of E Fay Jones in the area being a draw to some outside the region.  There's the Clinton House and other things like Pea Ridge.  Some people call it the best preserved Civil War battle site.  You won't regularly draw lots of people outside the region.  But I think there's enough that will appeal to some to bring them from further way.  It's just going to depend on what appeals to some people.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Mith242</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Fayetteville, Arkansas</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=12512&view=findpost&p=1109224]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=12512&view=findpost&p=1109224]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='citation'><a class='snapback' rel='citation' href='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=1109147'><img src='http://www.saveaplanet.org/cdn/img/public/style_images/up2010a/snapback.png' alt='View Post' /></a>Mith242, on 15 March 2010 - 02:25 PM, said:</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>Hmmm...this applies to more than just Fayetteville.  But not sure where's the best place to post this.  Looks like Walgreens is applying to sell beer and wine at all it's stores in wet counties in the state.  This will of course be an issue with the Fayetteville Police Chief and Sen Sue Madison.  But outside of NWA I wonder if this will even be an issue at all.  Seeing as how beer and some wine is already found in a lot of grocery stores in other wet counties in the state.</div></div><br />
<br />
When's alcohol not an issue with them.  I'm sure they've already issued mewling press releases about protecting college "kids".<br />
<br />
The Springdale liquor monopolist is still trying to prevent Macadoodles from getting their license too.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 04:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>aerotive</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Crystal Bridges Museum of American Art</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=12109&view=findpost&p=1109223]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=12109&view=findpost&p=1109223]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='citation'><a class='snapback' rel='citation' href='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=1109141'><img src='http://www.saveaplanet.org/cdn/img/public/style_images/up2010a/snapback.png' alt='View Post' /></a>Mith242, on 15 March 2010 - 02:10 PM, said:</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>Yeah I'd have to say I'm okay with it also.  I do think the facility itself will help draw enough tourism that it will make up the difference.  I think state officials overall agree as well.  I think the only thing they might have done differently is set it up so that it would be after the fact so a set dollar amount could be set.  The current situation is what other states have set up as well.  Had Arkansas not granted the exemption who's to say they might not have just built it in southwest Missouri instead.  Or for that matter not at all.</div></div><br />
<br />
<br />
I'm not so sure about increasing tourism, it's not like this area is a big tourist magnet.  How much can one museum do?  Is it supposed to be of the scale and quality of a major metro museum, the sort of museum with real drawing power?  Maybe just regional drawing power?  That said I'm certainly glad it's being built, let's not look a gift horse in the mouth...and I'll certainly visit soon after it's opened.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 04:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>aerotive</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Fayetteville, Arkansas</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=12512&view=findpost&p=1109147]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=12512&view=findpost&p=1109147]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmmm...this applies to more than just Fayetteville.  But not sure where's the best place to post this.  Looks like Walgreens is applying to sell beer and wine at all it's stores in wet counties in the state.  This will of course be an issue with the Fayetteville Police Chief and Sen Sue Madison.  But outside of NWA I wonder if this will even be an issue at all.  Seeing as how beer and some wine is already found in a lot of grocery stores in other wet counties in the state.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Mith242</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Fayetteville, Arkansas</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=12512&view=findpost&p=1109145]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=12512&view=findpost&p=1109145]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='citation'><a class='snapback' rel='citation' href='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=1109137'><img src='http://www.saveaplanet.org/cdn/img/public/style_images/up2010a/snapback.png' alt='View Post' /></a>zman9810, on 15 March 2010 - 02:56 PM, said:</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>This site is being prepped for construction finally. Crews have being taking down the houses on the property stick by stick for several weeks and now the trees are being logged. Whether actual building construction is coming soon ..who knows? Our daily newspaper has cut back on development news since the big merger and that was a major source for planning news. <br />
<br />
It was called Park Center and had over 100,000 sq. ft of space on around 8 acres when first proposed.</div></div><br />
I had forgotten about this.  Thanks for finding the original post as well.  I was wondering what was going on up there when I was riding my bicycle up to Lake Fayetteville last week.  Although it's not going to align too well with Vantage to the south.  Unless the road is going a lot further east than I think.  But then again there's a number of roads set up like that in Fayetteville.  Although in some ways I'll miss the old entrance to Veteran's Memorial Park.  While it wasn't the most accommodating for vehicles and you often had to stop to let traffic go on the other side.  I liked how it road left the trees up and slowed people down.  In a sense letting people know they were away from 'the city' and entering a more relaxing area.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Mith242</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Crystal Bridges Museum of American Art</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=12109&view=findpost&p=1109141]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=12109&view=findpost&p=1109141]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah I'd have to say I'm okay with it also.  I do think the facility itself will help draw enough tourism that it will make up the difference.  I think state officials overall agree as well.  I think the only thing they might have done differently is set it up so that it would be after the fact so a set dollar amount could be set.  The current situation is what other states have set up as well.  Had Arkansas not granted the exemption who's to say they might not have just built it in southwest Missouri instead.  Or for that matter not at all.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Mith242</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Fayetteville, Arkansas</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=12512&view=findpost&p=1109137]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=12512&view=findpost&p=1109137]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='citation'><a class='snapback' rel='citation' href='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=948226'><img src='http://www.saveaplanet.org/cdn/img/public/style_images/up2010a/snapback.png' alt='View Post' /></a>OnDickson, on 12 March 2008 - 11:49 AM, said:</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>Yep, that is the correct location for this development.  It is a mixed use development with retail at the front near zion road and a 6 story medical office building at the Northwest corner of the development nearest Lake Fayetteville.  The 6 story building will have 15 residential units/condos on the top floors.  The road through this development will be given to the city as a public road and will serve as the new officail entrance to Veteran's Memorial Park (the park on the south side of Lake Fayetteville).  It will align with Vantage drive to the south, and it is believed that there will be a stoplight at this intersection after this development is finished.  The Parks Board approved the new entrance to the Veteran's Park and recommended a change in name from Vantage Drive to Veteran's Memorial Drive to help with visibility for the park as well as to honor our veterans (currently there is no street named 'Veteran's' in Fayetteville)  There are no current active addresses on Vantage Drive, so a name change would not have an adverse economic impact on any businesses or residences.  The City Council must act on the name change for it to become official and it is my understanding it will be sponsored at one of the next meetings.  <br />
<br />
That's all I can recall off the top of my head.  I've got details of the development at my office and will check them later.  It looks like a really nice mixed use development--especially for that area of town.</div></div><br />
This site is being prepped for construction finally. Crews have being taking down the houses on the property stick by stick for several weeks and now the trees are being logged. Whether actual building construction is coming soon ..who knows? Our daily newspaper has cut back on development news since the big merger and that was a major source for planning news. <br />
<br />
It was called Park Center and had over 100,000 sq. ft of space on around 8 acres when first proposed.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>zman9810</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Fayetteville, Arkansas</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=12512&view=findpost&p=1109112]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=12512&view=findpost&p=1109112]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='citation'><a class='snapback' rel='citation' href='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=1108865'><img src='http://www.saveaplanet.org/cdn/img/public/style_images/up2010a/snapback.png' alt='View Post' /></a>Mith242, on 11 March 2010 - 02:14 PM, said:</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>Looks like the situation that started a while back between Fayetteville and Johnson is now basically over.  Fayetteville has been wanting better access to 'Uptown' also known to most as the 'Mall area'.  One thing in particular is better access westward to I-540.  The problem was that the land was in Johnson.  Fayetteville didn't want to spend a lot of money putting in more direct access to I-540 and then let all the tax dollars from development go to Johnson.  But now Johnson has decided to allow 99 acres to de-annex so that it can now be annexed into Fayetteville.  The deal both agreed to was basically Fayetteville would be allowed to annex these 99 acres, which was actually less than the previous amount.  And Fayetteville will still provide water and sewer services to southern Johnson.  Fayetteville was already doing this.  But there had been talk of Fayetteville possibly cutting off services because technically there wasn't any contract in place.  Southern Johnson will also start getting improved water and sewer services as well.  So that Fayetteville can get the 99 acres of what was southwest Johnson.  Looks like Fayetteville will eventually have Van Asche extend all the way westward to I-540.  I believe there's already a section of Van Asche in the land that was Johnson but isn't directly connected to the Van Asche in Fayetteville.  I suppose the city will also look into eventually putting in an interchange on I-540 as well somewhere not too far north of where I-540 and the Fulbright Expressway branch off.  But no idea what that might actually come about.</div></div><br />
In the spirit of compromise I guess this is a good deal although it would have been better to have the entire 422 acres come into Fayetteville. In the long term it would be better for the residents and businesses in that area to be in Fayetteville with all the benefits that would come from that. Johnson as a city would be hard pressed to come up with the money needed to make the municipal services available but will reap the benefits from Fayetteville supplying them. Eventually the central part of Johnson will be a pocket city squeezed in between the more well off Fayetteville and Springdale. It would be better to have a Johnson neighborhood with the actual city government dissolved and city services provided by the larger neighbors.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>zman9810</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Crystal Bridges Museum of American Art</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=12109&view=findpost&p=1109099]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=12109&view=findpost&p=1109099]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='citation'><a class='snapback' rel='citation' href='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=1109093'><img src='http://www.saveaplanet.org/cdn/img/public/style_images/up2010a/snapback.png' alt='View Post' /></a>zman9810, on 14 March 2010 - 11:23 PM, said:</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette had an interesting article about the financial details of this project. I read through this topic and it hasn't been mentioned- it seems Crystal Bridges was granted a special exemption by the state legislature from sales and use taxes that is costing any government entity that depends on those taxes a sorely needed source of revenue. The state legislature approved the measure in 2005 when the state had a surplus, local governments weren't cutting back and the project was estimated to cost much, much less than it is now. Because Act 1865 (sponsored by a Bentonville state representative, of course) didn't require Crystal Bridges to report how much it has spent there is now no way to know exactly how much tax revenue the state and local governments have lost because of the exemption.<br />
<br />
Crystal Bridges is evidently being tight-lipped about how much has been spent on the construction and art collection but required federal reports show that as of 2008 it had spent $66 million on construction and $257 million on art. Considering the museum was supposed to open in 2009 and construction is not remotely close to being completed in 2010 it is safe to say that the construction budget is many times more than $66 million. There have been several announcements of art purchases that could have ran into the $100 million range but without disclosure by Crystal Bridges the true amount will never be known. Going by the outdated 2008 figures the state and local governments could have lost an estimated $17 million in tax revenue- if the true amount spent were known it would obviously be much more.<br />
<br />
The rationale given by Crystal Bridges and supporting government officals is that once it is open that the museum will draw tourism dollars and national recognition that will compensate for the tax exemption. While this is to an extent probable there is no way to know at what cost those benefits will come or when they will come. The money being donated for this museum has came from the success of a corporation that already has cost state and local governments through the aid programs that it's employees use. While no one denies the importance of Wal Mart's presence to the area, it seems arrogant for the individuals to say they want a open-ended tax subsidy and they refuse to disclose how much that it is costing the average taxpayer.</div></div><br />
I'm okay with this. It is very rare for a private individual/group to pour this kind of money into an art museum that will have a massive cultural and (hopefully) economic impact on the area. Considering Bentonville/NWA isn't the one shelling out hundreds of millions on the museum itself and the art and we will reap the boost to tourism, reputation, and cultural activities, $10, 20, or even $50 million in lost tax revenue in the short term is still a huge bargain. Other areas our size would kill for that kind of deal.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>thewizard16</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Crystal Bridges Museum of American Art</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=12109&view=findpost&p=1109093]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=12109&view=findpost&p=1109093]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette had an interesting article about the financial details of this project. I read through this topic and it hasn't been mentioned- it seems Crystal Bridges was granted a special exemption by the state legislature from sales and use taxes that is costing any government entity that depends on those taxes a sorely needed source of revenue. The state legislature approved the measure in 2005 when the state had a surplus, local governments weren't cutting back and the project was estimated to cost much, much less than it is now. Because Act 1865 (sponsored by a Bentonville state representative, of course) didn't require Crystal Bridges to report how much it has spent there is now no way to know exactly how much tax revenue the state and local governments have lost because of the exemption.<br />
<br />
Crystal Bridges is evidently being tight-lipped about how much has been spent on the construction and art collection but required federal reports show that as of 2008 it had spent $66 million on construction and $257 million on art. Considering the museum was supposed to open in 2009 and construction is not remotely close to being completed in 2010 it is safe to say that the construction budget is many times more than $66 million. There have been several announcements of art purchases that could have ran into the $100 million range but without disclosure by Crystal Bridges the true amount will never be known. Going by the outdated 2008 figures the state and local governments could have lost an estimated $17 million in tax revenue- if the true amount spent were known it would obviously be much more.<br />
<br />
The rationale given by Crystal Bridges and supporting government officals is that once it is open that the museum will draw tourism dollars and national recognition that will compensate for the tax exemption. While this is to an extent probable there is no way to know at what cost those benefits will come or when they will come. The money being donated for this museum has came from the success of a corporation that already has cost state and local governments through the aid programs that it's employees use. While no one denies the importance of Wal Mart's presence to the area, it seems arrogant for the individuals to say they want a open-ended tax subsidy and they refuse to disclose how much that it is costing the average taxpayer.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 04:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>zman9810</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Fayetteville, Arkansas</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=12512&view=findpost&p=1108865]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=12512&view=findpost&p=1108865]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like the situation that started a while back between Fayetteville and Johnson is now basically over.  Fayetteville has been wanting better access to 'Uptown' also known to most as the 'Mall area'.  One thing in particular is better access westward to I-540.  The problem was that the land was in Johnson.  Fayetteville didn't want to spend a lot of money putting in more direct access to I-540 and then let all the tax dollars from development go to Johnson.  But now Johnson has decided to allow 99 acres to de-annex so that it can now be annexed into Fayetteville.  The deal both agreed to was basically Fayetteville would be allowed to annex these 99 acres, which was actually less than the previous amount.  And Fayetteville will still provide water and sewer services to southern Johnson.  Fayetteville was already doing this.  But there had been talk of Fayetteville possibly cutting off services because technically there wasn't any contract in place.  Southern Johnson will also start getting improved water and sewer services as well.  So that Fayetteville can get the 99 acres of what was southwest Johnson.  Looks like Fayetteville will eventually have Van Asche extend all the way westward to I-540.  I believe there's already a section of Van Asche in the land that was Johnson but isn't directly connected to the Van Asche in Fayetteville.  I suppose the city will also look into eventually putting in an interchange on I-540 as well somewhere not too far north of where I-540 and the Fulbright Expressway branch off.  But no idea what that might actually come about.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Mith242</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Fayetteville, Arkansas</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=12512&view=findpost&p=1108728]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=12512&view=findpost&p=1108728]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='citation'><a class='snapback' rel='citation' href='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=1108297'><img src='http://www.saveaplanet.org/cdn/img/public/style_images/up2010a/snapback.png' alt='View Post' /></a>zman9810, on 05 March 2010 - 10:33 AM, said:</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>Goodwill may have a perception problem- I think some people may see it as a Salvation Army/ charity type organization when in fact it is simply a non-profit that provides job training and employment for individuals that might otherwise not be able to find them. It doesn't have any religious affiliation and the resale stores are genrerally nice shopping spots. It fits right in with Fayetteville's image as a community that is concerned about the less well-off.<br />
<br />
The Circuit City building would be centrally located for the Fayetteville /Springdale market although the old Malco building would be ideal also. As many vacant buildings as there are right now surely they can find a place they can use.</div></div><br />
They already have a center in Springdale, which is another reason I think it'd make more sense to put it somewhere other than the north end of town. They have a donation center on Wedington that looks pretty nice, built into one of those mini-strip type malls across from the Country Inn and Suites, I just think even outside of perception reasons, it makes more sense to put it on College or actually, the south end of town, but I suppose they have their reasons for wanting it up there.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>thewizard16</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Infill projects in downtown Fayetteville</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=50913&view=findpost&p=1108526]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=50913&view=findpost&p=1108526]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='citation'><a class='snapback' rel='citation' href='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=1107973'><img src='http://www.saveaplanet.org/cdn/img/public/style_images/up2010a/snapback.png' alt='View Post' /></a>zman9810, on 03 March 2010 - 09:58 AM, said:</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>Do you have a price point that you want to meet? <br />
<br />
Yeah, being well received by the neighbors is important in getting it approved by the city. Neighborhood opposition seems to kill a lot of good ideas.</div></div><br />
<br />
Generally I would expect to get around $230-$240 per square foot.  We will see.  This place could be a little more or a little less depending on many factors (mainly how carried away I get with making it cool!)<br />
<br />
Mark<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>mzweig</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Housing market in Fayetteville</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=29710&view=findpost&p=1108525]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=29710&view=findpost&p=1108525]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='citation'><a class='snapback' rel='citation' href='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=1107885'><img src='http://www.saveaplanet.org/cdn/img/public/style_images/up2010a/snapback.png' alt='View Post' /></a>aerotive, on 02 March 2010 - 06:44 PM, said:</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>Does this really work?  If it does there are some incredibly naive buyers out there.</div></div><br />
<br />
We aren't doing it now.  It is really just a PR ploy--tho some with enough cash seemed to like the idea.<br />
<br />
Mark<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>mzweig</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Fayetteville Trail System</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=25005&view=findpost&p=1108453]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=25005&view=findpost&p=1108453]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I forgot to mention this earlier.  Looks like sometime during winter the city has put up a little interpretive sign/plaque about the Butterfield Overland Stage and Mail Route on the Lake Fayetteville Trail extension.  With the warmer weather I've made it back up there to that part of the trail system.  I had forgotten that the Butterfield Trail ran over there.  In fact I think a section of it is actually under water now on the very eastern edge of Lake Fayetteville.  But part of the Lake Fayetteville Trail now uses a part of the old Butterfield Route.  There's also been some interest on the national level of perhaps looking into making the Butterfield Trail an official National trail.  Not sure if that means this could mean there could be other parts added to the trail system.  I imagine some parts of it are now made up of existing roadway.  But it's still interesting to see that part of the Fayetteville Trail System could end up being part of a National Trail.  Although nothing is official yet.  The National Trail Division of the National Park Service, based out of Sante Fe, is doing the preliminary studies on possibly making the Butterfield Route an official National Trail in the next few years.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 20:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Mith242</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Fayetteville Trail System</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=25005&view=findpost&p=1108369]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=25005&view=findpost&p=1108369]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[name='Mith242' date='05 March 2010 - 06:06 PM' timestamp='1267834002' post='1108338']<br />
I admit the Mud Creek Trail extension isn't the ideal situation.  But I guess I'm still not sure it's going to be quite as bad as it seems.  I guess I'm going to have to wait and see the final product.  But overall I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree.   <img src='http://www.saveaplanet.org/cdn/img/public/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':)' />   I have to say I don't feel they are moving too quickly on the trail system.  So far they seem to be averaging 2-3 miles a year.  From my perspective if there's funding there then we should go ahead and use it and work on the trail system.  I suppose there could be some years where funding may be rather limited and not much will be added on.  I just hate to wait and possibly not have the funding there later.  Maybe it's just going to come down to what parts of the trail system do they work on.  I suppose they could work on some sections of the city where there isn't very high densities of people on the roads.  But for me I'd rather see additional trails that actual connect to the trail system.  But I could see if someone say in west Fayetteville wants more access to trails in their part of the city without having to drive to the other side of I-540.  Eventually these other segments of trails could eventually be connected to the main system.  But since I have good access to the main system, I'd rather the city just be able to add more connections off the mail system.  But that's my perspective on it.   <img src='http://www.saveaplanet.org/cdn/img/public/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':)' /><br />
[/quote]<br />
Oh..this is about much more than just the Mud Creek Trail extension. This about how the entire 129 miles of trail are designed and constructed.The Mud Creek extension is just the clearest example of what city policy is on how the trails are planned out. I added a link to the Trail Master Plan (I don't know why they didn't make it a PDF file that can be enlarged for clearer viewing). It shows the trails crossing N. College 2 times, Crossover 3 times, Gregg 2 times and the soon to be widened Rupple Rd 3 times. These are just some of the major roads that will have crossings - the map shows many more. If the present city policy of crossing these roads at grade is followed it will cause huge traffic problems. The money spent on road contruction to ease congestion and smooth traffic flow will be for naught. <br />
<br />
I think you hit upon an important point- the idea that progess on the trail system is measured by how many miles are added and how many connections are made. To me, the priorities should be safety first and then how well the trail system is integrated with the motor vehicle network. It is better to build a trail network that serves all city residents well by making all transportation options better- not throwing up obstacles for each other.<br />
<a href='http://www.accessfayetteville.org/government/parks_and_recreation/trails_and_greenways/trail_master_plan.cfm' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'>Trail Master Plan</a><br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 17:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>zman9810</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Restaurant Development in NW Arkansas</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=18298&view=findpost&p=1108339]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=18298&view=findpost&p=1108339]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='citation'><a class='snapback' rel='citation' href='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=1108327'><img src='http://www.saveaplanet.org/cdn/img/public/style_images/up2010a/snapback.png' alt='View Post' /></a>das450, on 05 March 2010 - 03:44 PM, said:</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>The owner passed away a few weeks ago.</div></div><br />
Thanks for the update.  In other news looks like ROTC grill will be reopening soon from the fire they had.<br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 00:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Mith242</author>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Fayetteville Trail System</title>
		<link><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=25005&view=findpost&p=1108338]]></link>
		<guid><![CDATA[http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=25005&view=findpost&p=1108338]]></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class='citation'><a class='snapback' rel='citation' href='http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/index.php?app=forums&module=forums&section=findpost&pid=1108298'><img src='http://www.saveaplanet.org/cdn/img/public/style_images/up2010a/snapback.png' alt='View Post' /></a>zman9810, on 05 March 2010 - 09:45 AM, said:</p><div class="blockquote"><div class='quote'>The City needs to slow down and build a trail system that doesn't cause more problems than it is worth. By the time 129 miles of trail are built under the present policy the motor vehicle network will have been strangled into massive gridlock. The Sidewalks and Trails Task Force may have good intentions in their view but the fact is that motor vehicles are and will be the primary means of transportation in the city for the long term. Walking and riding bicycles will be primarily a recreational use and putting recreation over safety and a uncongested street network is a mistake. <br />
<br />
By going slow and using the funds that are available to build a safer trail system that doesn't cause congestion on the streets the trails program will gain support and not have calls for it to lose all funding.</div></div><br />
I admit the Mud Creek Trail extension isn't the ideal situation.  But I guess I'm still not sure it's going to be quite as bad as it seems.  I guess I'm going to have to wait and see the final product.  But overall I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree.   <img src='http://www.saveaplanet.org/cdn/img/public/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':)' />   I have to say I don't feel they are moving too quickly on the trail system.  So far they seem to be averaging 2-3 miles a year.  From my perspective if there's funding there then we should go ahead and use it and work on the trail system.  I suppose there could be some years where funding may be rather limited and not much will be added on.  I just hate to wait and possibly not have the funding there later.  Maybe it's just going to come down to what parts of the trail system do they work on.  I suppose they could work on some sections of the city where there isn't very high densities of people on the roads.  But for me I'd rather see additional trails that actual connect to the trail system.  But I could see if someone say in west Fayetteville wants more access to trails in their part of the city without having to drive to the other side of I-540.  Eventually these other segments of trails could eventually be connected to the main system.  But since I have good access to the main system, I'd rather the city just be able to add more connections off the mail system.  But that's my perspective on it.   <img src='http://www.saveaplanet.org/cdn/img/public/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':)' /><br><br><b>View information on projects and add your own in our new Project Database: [<a href="http://www.urbanplanet.org/forums/page/databases/project_db">Link</a>]</b>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 00:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Mith242</author>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>